越南母語者之華語量詞的第二語言習得研究

The Acquisition of Mandarin Classifiers by Vietnamese Learners of Chinese as a Second Language

黎氏芳草(Le Thi Phuong Thao)

指導教授 ： 陳純音

國立臺灣師範大學/文學院/英語學系/碩士(2023年)

https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300214

摘要

本研究主要探討越南成人中文二語學習者如何習得中文分類詞，研究對象為 30 位介於 19 到 34 歲的越南學生，依其中文程度，分成兩組(一組中文程度為中低級(程度為 B1或 B1 以下)，另一組為中高級(程度為 B2 或 B2 以上))。另外，本研究亦招募 15 位中文母語者作為控制組。實驗設計為圖片描述題以及選擇題，藉由此兩種題型觀察受試者對於中文分類詞的口語表達能力和理解能力。此兩題型中皆有關於形狀、生命性、功能、事件、標準、容器、部分及群體等分類詞的題目，共計 16 題。
本研究發現，如下：首先，中文中低程度的越南人在數詞(measure words)方面表現得比數量詞(numeral classifiers)來得好，而中文中高程度的越南人在量詞和數詞分類詞的表現一致。第二，越南人在不同類性的分類詞表現不同。其中對越南人來說容器、功能和形狀的分類詞比部分、群體和事件分類詞更容易習得。 第三，中低程度受試者比中高程度受試者更頻繁地使用「個」來替代更精準的分類詞用法。最後，中低程度的受試者比中高程度受試者更容易被越南母語影響其第二外語中文的表現。總體來說，本研究發現中文程度會大幅影響越南受試者對於中文分類的理解。

關鍵字

中文分類詞 ； 第二外語習得 ； 越南成人 ； 第一語言遷移

並列摘要

The present study examined how Vietnamese adult learners of Chinese acquire Chinese classifiers. Thirty Vietnamese participants, ages 19 to 34, were recruited to participate in this study, and they were further divided into two groups according to their Chinese proficiency level: Low-Intermediate group (B1 and lower levels) and High-Intermediate group (B2 and higher levels). In addition, fifteen Taiwanese native speakers of Chinese were invited to participate in this study as the control group. For the research design, two tasks, Picture Description task and Multiple-Choice task, were designed to examine the participants' comprehension and production of Chinese classifiers. In each task, a set of sixteen numeral classifiers and measure words denoting Shape, Animacy, Function, Event, Standard, Container, Partitive, and Group was selected to test the participants’ performance on various classifiers.
The results of the study revealed the following important findings: first, the Vietnamese adults at the low level of Chinese proficiency performed significantly better on measure words than on numeral classifiers while those at the high level performed equally well on both measure words and numeral classifiers. Second, the Vietnamese participants performed differently on different types of classifiers, in which Container, Function, and Shape classifiers were found to be more easily acquired than Partitive, Group, and Event classifiers. Third, the Low-Intermediate participants employed the general classifier ge as a placeholder by using it substantially more frequently than the High-Intermediate group. Finally, the Low-Intermediate group was also found to be influenced by their mother tongue more than those at the high level of Chinese proficiency. In general, the present findings indicate that Chinese proficiency does have a huge impact on how the Vietnamese adults comprehend and use Chinese classifiers.

並列關鍵字

Chinese classifiers ； second language acquisition ； Vietnamese adults ； L1 transfer

參考文獻

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Al-Khresheh, Mohammad Hamad. 2015. A review study of interlanguage theory. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 4.3:123-131.

Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53.2:285-311.

Alves, Mark J. 1999. What’s so Chinese about Vietnamese?. Proceedings of the ninth annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, ed. by Graham W. Thurgood, 221-242. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.

Alves, Mark J. 2003. Ruc and other Minor Vietic languages: Linguistic strands between Vietnamese and the rest of the Mon-Khmer language family. Proceedings of the seventh annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, ed. by Karen L. Adams et al., 3-19. Tempe, Arizona: Arizona State University.