原住民部落營造與再生策略-以復興鄉溪口台部落為例

Study on the Construction and Regeneration Strategy of Indigenous tribes：A case study of Sikotai tribe in fusin town

宋國用(Kuo-Yung Song)

指導教授 ： 曾漢珍

國立臺北大學/人文學院/民俗藝術研究所/碩士(2011年)

摘要

本研究主要是以原住民部落營造與再生策略為議題，從部落之角度切入，探討部落再生最佳之策略。研究範圍設定在桃園縣復興鄉泰雅族溪口台部落，研究方法大部分採質性研究法，直接與部落、文化工作者、地方政府以及耆老對談，小部份採量化研究以獲得部落真正之認知態度。研究發現溪口台部落的泰雅族人仍是遵循泰雅族gaga之核心價值為部落發展之依歸；由於部落領域之認同，溪口台部落教會之介入，也影響了部落文化的發展，部落人大多認為泰雅族文化與宗教是不相衝突，反而對傳承泰雅族文化有幫助；溪口台部落分上、下兩個部落，本為單一部族之領域，日據時期「集團移住」之後，下溪口台也多了一個部族，雖曾釀成部落對抗，經部落長老之「psbalay ke」化解，從此兩部落就有閒隙，近年經由公部門之統合，以及部落會議機制適時推出，上下部落才有意見交流之機會，真正能統合上下部落意見者是地方首長（鄉長），這是部落領導轉移之現象。
1990年代，在國家政策賦權下推動社區營造，並推出地方「產業文化化•文化產業化」，希望提升地方文化產業之附加價值，經由地方政府推動與鼓勵下，溪口台部落在公部門大量的資源挹注下，部落人展開學習型部落營造，惟仍面臨許多發展困境。
有鑑於此，溪口部落正開始慢慢推動文化園區的營造，研究也發現文化園區受絕大部份部落人支持，只有極少數人認為文化園區無未來性；而文化園區之經營由部落人自己經營為最多人表示；惟公部門、部落營造組織及學術之意見則偏向共同經營之思考。本研究綜合地方政府人員、部落營造組織領導人及學術單位等各種意見之整理，對正規劃中之泰雅族文化園區，經由SWOT潛力分析及擬定策略對策，協助相關單位，善用優勢，避開風險，掌握機會，加強弱點，做為策劃行動之參考。

關鍵字

泰雅族文化（gaga） ； 原住民部落營造 ； 部落再生策略 ； 文化園區 ； 文化觀光 ； 文化再現

並列摘要

This research focuses on the construction and regeneration strategy of indigenous tribes, discussing the best strategy from the standpoint of tribe. Its research scope is confined in the Sikotai tribe in Fusin Town of Taoyuan County, the research approach mostly adopts qualitative method, thereby interviewing the tribes, cultural workers, local government and elderly; while a little bit of quantitative method is also used to acquire the perceiving attitude of the tribe. The study discovers that the Sikotai tribe still follows the core value of Gaga for further development which was also influenced by the identification of tribe territory, involvement of tribe church. Most people of the tribe think that there is no conflict between their culture and religion; in contrast, both are beneficiary to their cultural inheritance. Sikotai tribe is divided into the upper and the lower tribes, it was originally a single tribe, but after the happening of “Group Relocation” during Japanese-Governing period, another tribe appeared at the lower Sikotai area. Both tribes ever competed, though through the coordination negotiation done by elderly Psbalay Ke, the gap between them still existed since then. Over recent years, by the integration of public sector and timely introduction of tribe conferences, the two tribes started to have chance for opinion exchange and communication. The person who can really consolidate the tribes’ opinions is the Town Head; this is the transfer of tribe leadership.
In 1990s, under the authorization of national policy to push community construction, proposing “cultural industry and industrial culture” in order to promote the added value of local cultural industries, fueled by the encouragement of local agencies and abundant resource support of the public sectors, people in tribe started to develop learning operation, however they faced a lot of difficulties.
In order to solve this problem, Sikotai tribe was beginning to gradually push the construction of cultural quarter. The study also discovers that the cultural quarter is supported by most people in the tribe; only minority thinks the quarter will have no future. Most people in tribe suggest the cultural quarter should be operated by aborigines themselves, whereas the public sectors, tribe operation organization and academic ideas are inclined to joint-operation. For the cultural quarter under planning, this study combines various ideas of local agencies, leaders of tribe operation organization and academy institutions, to determine strategy and tactic by means of SWOT analysis, thereby using its advantages, avoiding risks, holding opportunity, reducing weakness, to generate the reference of further implementation.

並列關鍵字

Gaga culture ； Construction of aboriginal tribes ； Regeneration strategy of tribe ； Cultural quarter ； Cultural Tourism ； Culture representation.

參考文獻

舊慣調查會，中央研究院民族學研究所編譯。

江宜樺（1998）《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》，台北：揚智文化。

林光浩（2007）《原住民地區發展生態旅遊之潛力分析-以屏東縣春日鄉

施正峰（2008）〈原住民族與自然資源的共管〉，台灣原住民族研季刊第1卷第1期。

胡克昌（2008）《社區總體營造在原住民部落發展之研究－以寒溪部落發展為例》