透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.152.162
  • 學位論文

公務人員工作類型與休閒態度認知之研究

The study of different worker types of government officials and their preference of leisure life.

指導教授 : 翁興利
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


人的因素決定了一個組織的成敗,因此人力資源便是管理的重心,員工對於工作的態度更是影響他對組織貢獻的程度。工業革命以來,產業結構與生產方式的改變,工作已不再是人們生活的唯一目標,休閒生活也成為生活重要的部份也就此延伸探討不同類型的公務人員對於休閒放假偏好為何? 本研究目的在於探討公務機關的公務人員是否存在著不同的工作者類型,不同的工作者類型在工作的表現上是否存在差異,對於休閒的看法是否有不同,不同的個人變項是否是影響不同工作者類型的因素,以及在不同類型公務機關的公務員對於工作者的類型使否有存在差異。本文以問卷調查法,對蒐集之410份有效問卷,以集群分析、變異數分析、交叉分析來驗證各變項之間的影響與顯著程度。 研究結果發現存在四種類型不同類型的工作者,本研究分別將其命名為「積極工作者」、「正面工作者」、「保健工作者」、「消極工作者」,再將這四種類型對於一些工作表現構面作分析,發現不同的類型在工作表現有明顯的差異存在,不同的工作者類型在休閒的偏好上也存有差異,而個人變項對工作者類型則是有部分會有差異存在。

並列摘要


The success of an organization is determined by its employees. Thus human resource is the core of management. In addition, working attitude of an employee affects the degree of his/her dedication. Since Industrial Revolution, industry structure and production mechanism have changed. Working is no longer the only target; leisure life now plays a key role. Based on the aforementioned reasons, I further analyzed the leisure activity preference for government officials at different positions. The purpose of this study is to determine that whether different worker type exist among government officials. Will these various worker types result in discrepancy in working performance and in perspective of leisure time? Also, do individual difference and/or government position have an effect on the various worker types? My research is based on questionnaire; using 410 effective questionnaire to conduct cluster analysis, variance analysis and tabulated statistics and to verify the correlation among variables. Result shows that there are four kinds of worker, namely aggressive worker, positive worker, hygiene worker and passive work. Then I use these four types of worker to analyze their working performance to get the following conclusions. Obvious working performance differences exist among different types of worker; recreational preference also exists among different types of worker. However individual variation only result part of difference.

參考文獻


薛銘卿,<休閒及休閒活動定義之詮釋:非規範及規範性觀點」,戶外遊憩研究,第5卷第3/4期,頁71-89,民國81年。
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K.G., Hennessey, B.A., & Tighe , E.M. (1994). The work preference Inventory : Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967.
Buelens , M. and Poelmans,S.A.Y.(2004),”Enriching the Spence and Robbins , Typology of workaholism: demographic , motivational and organizational correlates”,Journal of Organizational Change Management , Vol.17 No.5,pp.440-458
Chick, G., and Hood, R. D., (1996)”Working and Recreating with Machines: Outdoor Recreation Choices among Machine Tool Workers in Western Pennsylvania,” Leisure Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 333-354.
Clark, R. A., Nye, F. I., and Gecas, V., (1978)”Husbands’ Work Involvement and Marital Role Performance,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 9-21.

被引用紀錄


曾德民(2009)。臺北市國中生休閒態度與休閒阻礙之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315160429
李美婷(2011)。行政院各部會員工休閒態度與休閒無聊感之相關研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315255913

延伸閱讀