- 學位論文
胡玉縉的目錄學─以《四庫全書總目提要補正》為中心
The bibliography research about Mr. Hu Yu Jin─which is centered around The Correction of The Catalogue Summary of imperial Collection of Four
若您是本文的作者，可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。
摘要
本論文的研究目的在於耙梳、整理胡玉縉的生平記載、官府經歷，及目錄學研究的原因與過程等，同時對於胡玉縉的目錄學研究模式、分析方法做一全面性探討，除整理其在目錄學中的成就與影響外，亦比較胡玉縉的研究方法與余嘉錫、崔富章與李裕民在《四庫全書總目提要》補正、勘誤上不同的看法與分析。至於研究範圍，則是以《四庫全書總目提要補正》為中心，並輔以相關探討胡玉縉生平、經歷與研究成果之專書、論文、期刊論文等做一概括性研究。 本文主要採用文獻分析法和歷史研究法，除研讀《四庫全書總目提要補正》之外，亦蒐集、閱讀胡玉縉相關的生平資料、書札等，同時參閱《江蘇吳縣縣誌》相關資料，從中推敲胡玉縉起心動念對《四庫全書總目提要》進行補正的原因等。 論文內容除證明胡玉縉乃承繼乾嘉學派的治學方法外，更將重點放置在他對《四庫全書總目提要》補正的方法，舉其推論《忠經》、《化書》兩書作者有誤之過程，還有他對四庫館臣於收錄《周禮注疏合解》未能詳閱張采的序言，而誤植張采為作者之例證。此諸多例證皆可說明胡玉縉補正的邏輯推理。另外，胡玉縉對於無法定論的研究，則會完整記載他所獲資料和摘錄文章的出處，並整理其推論，同時留下考證的空間和資料以利後續學者研究，亦可展現胡玉縉治學之無私及嚴謹。 綜觀本篇論文研究結果，可得胡玉縉是以乾嘉學派之法來治學，於目錄學研究上佔有其重要之影響地位，他以詳盡而全面性的考證與辨思，逐一針對其條目與提要來做補正，最後成就了《四庫全書總目提要補正》一書，由此可見其深厚學問。
並列摘要
The purpose of this research paper is to reorganize Hu Yu-Jin's life records, working experience in Chinese Official, and the causes and other processes of his bibliography study. At the same time, I also make a comprehensive discussion about Hu Yu-Jin’s bibliography research patterns and analytical methods. In addition to the integration of his achievements and influence in the bibliography research, more Hu Yu-Jin’s research methods are compared with Yu Jia-Xi’s, Tsuei Fu-Zhang’s and Li Yu-Min’s different views and analysis about “The Catalogue Summary OF Imperial Collection of Four.” As for the range of my study, “The Correction of The Catalogue Summary OF Imperial Collection of Four” is set as the center, supplemented by additional related research of Hu Yu-Jin’s biographies, monographs, and journals. In this paper, literatural analysis and historical research is majorly used. In addition to reading “The Correction of The Catalogue Summary of Imperial Collection of Four”, I also read and collect Hu Yu -Jin’s relevant biographical information, and letters. Besides, I also use “Jiangsu Wuxian County Histroy” as relevant information, trying to figure out the reasons why Hu Yu-in would correct “The Catalogue Summary OF Imperial Collection of Four.” Some clues are found Hu’s research methods were inherited from Qianlong and Jiaqing’s Faction, and I put much more emphasis on the approaches which he used to correct “The Catalogue Summary of Imperial Collection of Four.” Thus, I provide the evidence to describe how Hu Yu-Jin found that the authors of three books were mistakenly recognized as actual writers. What mentioned in my paper was Hu Yu-Jin’s logic of his research. In addition, he would reserve complete records that he couldn’t infer from the materials and leave some space and information for the young scholars to do further research. Above all, he played an important role in “The Research of Imperial Collection of Four”, and did amendments to detailed items and summary. Therefore, a great and influential piece of work was finally completed.
參考文獻
1〈「四庫學」研究的反思〉 楊晉龍 《中國文哲研究集刊》第4期 1994年3月 頁349~394
5〈清代乾嘉揚州學派經學研究的成果與貢獻〉 賴貴三 《漢學研究通訊季刊》第19卷第4期(總第76期) 2000年11月 頁588-595
2《四庫館臣辨偽學研究》 顏宇美 國立臺北大學古典文獻學研究所碩士論文 2011年 楊果霖指導
6《余嘉錫之文獻學研究》 唐嘉蓮 國立臺灣師範大學國文研究所碩士班論文 2012年 陳廖安指導
【參考文獻】