都市更新是現今台北市都市發展的主要重大政策之一,而都市更新制度是如何運作的呢?政府 在都市更新過程中又扮演什麼樣的角色?管制的強弱程度對推動都市更新又有什麼樣的影響?本文 基於管制理論的概念,以民間參與都市更新事業的推動開發「重建」的推動更新方式為探討中心, 探討都市更新法制的變遷可以發現政府從早期的強勢主導者角色轉變為現在的協助性與把關者角色 。而都市更新法制本身所衍生的交易成本,在實施者主導重建過程、地主具有的專業與資訊不足的 情況下,基於各自的利害關係考量,導致都市更新事業的整合緩慢或是放棄開發。 本研究以台北市都市更新事業實際推動的申請程序、就法規面及實際執行面、及個案案例在 「政府」、「實施者」、「住戶」等的互動面向加以檢討分析,以探討民間辦理都市更新在事業推動時, 整合過程中的交易成本、以及後續面臨到的障礙課題,造成民間推動都市更新重建的困境與開發成 效不彰之現況。都市更新相關法規的變遷、都市更新相關行為者在推動都更過程影響力的強弱、都 市更新中心與相關協力組織的出現等,從制度、交易成本、高度專業複雜性和雙方資訊不完全的交 互作用下,以資訊不對稱、管制失靈來解釋現今台北市都市更新政策面臨到的問題,並以管制革新 的角度、進一步提出未來政府輔助民間推動都市更新事業的問題解決與發展趨勢。
Urban renewal now is one of main major policy for Taipei development, but how does the urban renewal institution work? What kind of role does government play in the urban renewal process? And what kind of influences does the regulatory strength make in the promotion of urban renewal? Based on the concept of regulatory theory, this paper focuses on the method of “reconstruction”, promoting the development of private sector engagement in urban renewal. Changing of the urban renewal law can be found that government’s role has changed. Government, as a strong leader from the early, change into the present role of the gatekeeper. The transaction costs derived from the urban renewal law itself, in the situation that implementers took the lead in the reconstruction process, but the landlord had the absence of the professionals and sufficient information. Based on consideration of their interests, leading to the implementers decide to slow down the integration of urban renewal, or give up the cause of development. This research review the application process of practicing to promote Taipei City's urban renewal business, on the surface and actual execution of these regulations, and by case analysing the interaction between the “government” , “perpetrators”, and “inhabitants”. To explore the career private department push for urban renewal, the transaction costs of the integration process, and follow-up to the obstacles, as a result, the reconstruction of private department promoting urban renewal and development have been into an ineffective situation. Institutions about urban renewal are changing ,and urban renewal-related behaviors have influence in the process of promoting urban renewal more or less, so that the urban renewal center and related organizations, the appearance of such third-party. From the institution, transaction costs, and both highly specialized and complex interactions under incomplete information, using information asymmetry, and regulatory failure to interpret the current issues about to the urban renewal policies of Taipei City. From the point of view of regulatory reform, further recommend that government assistance to solve the problem when private department promoting urban renewal and development trends in the future.