透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.35.148
  • 學位論文

醫療行為與過失行為於刑法上關係之研究

The Research of the Relationship in Criminal Law between Medical Treatment and Negligent Act

指導教授 : 甘添貴
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文所進行者係醫療行為與過失行為於刑法上關係之研究,論述之脈絡則從題目著手,依序探討醫療行為之定義暨範圍、醫療過失之意義、除罪化之正反見解、除罪化之可能方式,最後得出結論。 鑒於醫療科技之日新月異,醫療行為之定義不宜過於僵化,本文遂主張以行政院衛生署函釋見解為本,增加概括條款以修改醫療行為之定義。蓋唯有確定醫療行為之範圍後,除罪化之討論才能真正發揮實用,否則將淪為紙上談兵。至於醫療過失之認定方式與一般過失並無本質上差異,惟須參考醫療法之規定以確定行為人具體之醫療義務範圍,方有可能判斷行為人是否有過失。 醫療事故中之過失行為除罪化主要集中在引入比較法上重大過失概念之探討,但本文認為不但打亂我國刑法過失犯之體系架構,背後更重大之理由則是有違反平等原則之疑慮。 任何職業都有其風險存在,若刑法選擇對醫療行為作出讓步,必將失去人民對於法律公正性之信賴。其他職業難保不會群起效法,最終結果是,刑法成為有力團體所操弄之工具,此實非吾人所樂見,故本文結論認為醫療事故中之過失行為不應除罪化。

並列摘要


The research of the relationship in criminal law between medical treatment and negligent act started with defining the notion of medical treat, then the meaning of medical negligence, both the positive and the negative perspectives of the decriminalization subject, every possible ways of decriminalization and the final conclusion. According to the ever-changing medical technology, the definition of medical treatment should not be inflexible. It is necessary to add a general term to the current definition of medical treatment. Without determining it, the discussion of decriminalization would be worthless. There is no essential difference between medical negligence and criminal negligence. Only after consulting the medical law to find out the specific medical obligation scope, it is able to judge whether one has medical negligence or not. The discussion of decriminalization of medical negligence mainly focuses on the introduction of the concept of distinguishing different levels of negligence. However, it not only ruins the current criminal negligence theory in Taiwan but also violates the principle of equality. Every industry has its own risk. If the criminal law makes concessions on medical treatment, people will lose their trust for legal fairness. Perhaps other professions would ask for the same treat, the criminal law becomes the tool for their own interests. Thus, the negligent act in medical malpractice should not be in the decriminalization.

參考文獻


14.陳子平,刑法總論,作者自版,2008年9月二版
2期、第8卷3期、第9卷1期,2000年3月、2000年9月、2001年3月
7.朱柏松、詹森林、張新寶、陳忠五、陳聰富,醫療過失舉證責任之
比較,國立臺灣大學人文社會高等研究院,2008年5月初版
139期,2009年11月1日

被引用紀錄


Kuan, C. K. (2012). 民刑事因果關係於訴訟證明之科學依據研究——以醫療事故案件為核心 [master's thesis, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.01762
吳育庭(2012)。論錯誤醫療行為 ─ 以我國相關司法實務判決為中心〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613493208

延伸閱讀