論連續犯、常業犯規定廢除後之影響及因應－以著作權法為中心

A Research on the Impacts of, and Possible Solutions to, the Abolishment of the Successive Crime and Professional Crime: Focusing on the Copyright Law

胡中瑋(Chung-We Hu)

指導教授 ： 林輝煌教授

共同指導教授 ： 蕭雄淋副教授(Hsiung-Lin Hsiao)

國立臺北大學/法律學院/法律學系/碩士(2010年)

摘要

民國94年2月2日修正通過之中華民國刑法，係我國刑法自民國24年制定公布施行以來修正幅度最大的一次。在本次修正案中，影響司法實務、學界最重大、最紛擾者，莫過於刑法廢除連續犯、常業犯之規定。在刑法領域上，關於廢除連續犯、常業犯規定後應如何適用法律之問題，至今實務、學界見解歧異，尚未形成通說。而相較於刑法實務及學界對於廢除連續犯、常業犯規定後之如何適用法律之問題探討，在著作權法領域，此議題似乎尚未獲得較多的討論與關注。
在著作權法中，刑罰能否實現保護著作權人權益之目的，達成調和社會公共利益，促進國家文化發展之任務，論罪科刑可謂扮演著決定性的角色。因此，本文將探討連續犯、常業犯廢止後，在著作權法刑事案件中應如何適用法律來論罪科刑，並以臺北、臺中和高雄縣市地方法院、臺灣高等法院、智慧財產法院及最高法院違反著作權法之實務見解為中心，觀察我國法院在著作權案件中，對於連續犯、常業犯廢除後應該如何適用法律，進而提出本文看法與建議，期對於相關問題於著作權法學理上未來發展有所裨益。

關鍵字

著作權 ； 連續犯 ； 常業犯

並列摘要

The Feb 2, 2005 amendment of R.O.C. (Taiwan) Criminal Code is the most extensive of all amendments since the Criminal Code was promulgated in 1935.In this amendment, the abolishment of articles regarding successive crime and professional crime affects judicial practices and academic circles in the most substantive and baffling ways.In the area of criminal laws study, issues of applications of laws after the abolishment of the successive crime and professional crime differs among judicial practices and academic circles and no majority opinions has been formed regarding the applications of laws.Compared to discussions among judicial practices and academic circles regarding issues of applications of laws after abolishement of the successive crime and professional crime, these kinds of issues receive little discussion and attention in copyright laws area.
In the copyright law, incrimination and sentencing plays a crucial role in whether the penalty can help realize the purposes of protecting the rights and interests of authors with respect to their works, balancing different interests for the common good of society, and promoting the development of national culture. Therefore, this article is going to discuss how to apply the law when making decision in copyright criminal cases after the abolishment of the successive crime and professional crime. Focusing on reviewing the praxis of Taiwan Taipei, Shihlin, Banciao, Taichung and Kaohsiung District Courts, the Taiwan High Court, the Intellectual Property Court and the Supreme Court, this article will examine how the law is applied by our courts in the copyright cases after the abolishment of the successive crime and professional crime, and try to offer opinions and suggestions, and which hopefully can contribute to the development of related issues in the copyright law theory in the future.

並列關鍵字

Copyright Law ； Successive Crime ； Professional Crime

參考文獻

3、吳景欽，連續犯牽連犯刪除後於刑事程序上之影響，法令月刊，第56卷第6期，2005年6月。

26、陳樸生，略談刑事刑法與行政刑法之關係，法令月刊，第36卷第11期，1985年11月。

40、蔡墩銘，特別刑法之檢討，法令月刊，第35卷第10期，1984年10月。

41、蕭宏宜，保安處分與罪刑法定，法令月刊，第57卷第4期，2006年4月。

12、劉邦繡，連續犯廢除後罪數理論之研究，臺灣臺中地方法院檢察署編印，2005年12月。