透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.189.2.122
  • 學位論文

論土地徵收補償之合理估算-美國加州之經驗

Fair Valuation for Expropriation Compensation-Lessons of California

指導教授 : 林子欽
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


徵收補償為調和公益與私益衝突之最佳手段,然而我國少由價格角度分析徵收補償之意涵。然而,徵收補償價格不僅影響被徵收人,甚至影響其他社會大眾之利益,涉及範圍甚廣。本研究主要目的為釐清土地徵收補償價格之真正意義。我國以公告現值做為徵收補償依據,但公告現值主要功用有二,一是課徵土地增值稅或設定典權時依據,二是用以評定徵收補償金額。稅賦不宜過度課徵,以免加重人民負擔,課稅標準通常傾向略低於市價;徵收補償標準應在合理範圍內接近市價。以同一價值做為兩種目的不同之政策衡量標準是否合適,值得深思。 本研究先藉由探討美國徵收補償相關文獻,檢視我國現行制度下產生之價格問題。接著以最高行政法院相關案例檢視法院處理態度,探討處理方法是否恰當。最後輔以美國加州徵收補償概念與案例,試圖提出台灣徵收補償改進方向。

關鍵字

徵收補償 公告現值

並列摘要


Expropriation compensation is often the last resort to redress the balance of public and private interests when a property is taken. Despite of its significance, the meaning of compensation in eminent domain has rarely been examined from the valuation perspective. The payment of compensation not only affects the condemnees but also the society as a whole. Compensation payment has significant influence on every individuals. This thesis aims to thoroughly analyze the measurement of compensation in eminent domain through a comparative study of Taiwan and California. Taiwan has employed government-declared current land value as the compensation basis. This declared value serves as the benchmark for both purposes of land value taxation and expropriation compensation. A taxation base tends to be kept lower than the market value in the fear of increasing the burden of taxpayers. In contrast, the fair compensation in eminent domain shall be equivalent to the market value. There appears to be an inherent conflict when the same value basis acts for two opposing functions. In addition to a systematic review of relevant literature, this thesis further analyzes the present operation of expropriation compensation in Taiwan through the examination of how the administrative courts have dealt with the compensation appeals. Finally, this thesis has identified a number of directions for future improvement based don the parallel experience in California, U.S.

參考文獻


17.吳秀瑾(2005),依靠與平等:論Kittay愛的勞動,女學學誌,19:157-183。
24.林英彥(2003),不動產估價(十版),台北市:自版。
26.莊國銘(2003),亞里斯多德論鞏固政治共同體的兩大德性:正義與友誼,政治科學論叢,18:191-216。
38.黃宗樂(1991),土地徵收補償上若干問題之研討,台大法學論叢,21(1):67-103。
48.鍾玉美(2005),現行土地徵收補償制度之探討,土地問題研究季刊,4(2):74-80。

被引用紀錄


葉禎祥(2012)。土地徵收目的與地價補償標準之研究—以新修正土地徵收條例第三十條為中心〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201200409
張雅惠(2015)。區段徵收理論與實務探討-以抵價地制度為中心〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00222
劉志清(2009)。政府土地徵收補償之研究-從財產權的觀點〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.02995
江東融(2016)。土地徵收剩餘地個案估價方法之探討〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0009520
謝搖明(2012)。我國土地徵收制度之研究-以徵收之地價補償及其行政救濟為中心〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613505906

延伸閱讀