透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.225.31.159
  • 學位論文

以高斯演化方式預測蛋白質-蛋白質嵌合位置

A Gaussian evolutionary method for predicting protein-protein interaction sites

指導教授 : 楊進木

摘要


研究蛋白質-蛋白質之間的交互作用在分子生物的領域中扮演非常重要的任務,一個可行的策略是先辨認及研究蛋白質-蛋白質交互作用的區域,再根據交互作用區域的特性進行分析,並且了解蛋白質的功能。在這篇論文研究中,我們發展了一個適用於預測蛋白質-蛋白質交互作用區域的函式,結合了原子的疏水性以及蛋白質的二級結構的特性,利用高斯演算法進行最佳化後,在測試評量中有不錯的表現。我們使用了104個蛋白質結構進行最佳化函式的訓練,在訓練的資料中我們成功的預測超過半數以上的蛋白質-蛋白質交互作用區域(65.4%)。此外,我們將訓練之後的最佳化函式測試在50個沒有出現在訓練資料內的蛋白質結構中,我們的函式可以成功的預測其中的46%蛋白質-蛋白質交互作用區域,我們相信在函式中使用的參數對於分析蛋白質-蛋白質之間的交互作用是有幫助的,並且可以應用到不同的方法上來預測蛋白質-蛋白質交互作用區域。此外,我們修改著名的蛋白質-配體嵌合工具”GEMDOCK”成為蛋白質-蛋白質嵌合工具,並且使用內建的蛋白質-配體計分程式來計算蛋白質-蛋白質嵌合的結果。我們測試了50個蛋白質結構,並且發現修改後的”GEMDOCK”在搜尋蛋白質-蛋白質嵌合之空間結構仍然保有相當的水準,可是在計算最佳嵌合結構時,原始的蛋白質-配體計分程式對於辨認蛋白質-蛋白質交互作用的情況仍然不足。未來,我們將會整合蛋白質-蛋白質交互作用區塊之預測到”GEMDOCK”中,並且改進蛋白質-配體計分程式成為蛋白質-蛋白質計分程式,以及發展可以改變蛋白質構形的策略,用以解決”unbound”蛋白質-蛋白質嵌合問題。

並列摘要


Protein-protein interactions play a pivotal role in modern molecular biology. Therefore, identifying the interface between two interacting proteins is a matter of great scientific and practical interest. In this study, we proposed a Gaussian Evolutionary Method (GEM) to optimal atomic and 2nd structure parameters for predicting protein-protein interaction sites. The training set of GEM consist 104 unbound proteins from PDB, and we are able to predict the location of the interface on 65.4%. In addition, we apply trained GEM to testing set of 50 unbound proteins. Our method can predict 98% proteins among whole testing set and have 46% successfully prediction and 42.3% average specificity. A prediction is assumed successful if over half of the predicted continuous interface patch is indeed interface (specificity). The parameters of GEM may be useful for analysis of protein-protein interfaces, and can apply to different methods for interfaces prediction. Furthermore, we have modified famous protein-ligand docking tool “GEMDOCK” for protein-protein docking using original scoring functions. We tested 50 bound protein-protein docking and found that search strategies of GEMDOCK works well in rigid-body protein-protein docking, however, the scoring functions of protein-ligand docking seems poor to identify correct protein-protein binding conformations. In the future, we will combine protein-protein interaction sites prediction into GEMDOCK and improve scoring function of GEMDOCK for protein-protein docking and develop soft-body protein-protein docking strategies for solving unbound-unbound protein docking problems.

參考文獻


[3] Y. Ho, A. Gruhler, A. Heilbut, G. D. Bader, L. Moore, S. L. Adams, A. Millar, P. Taylor, K. Bennett, K. Boutilier, L. Yang, C. Wolting, I. Donaldson, S. Schandorff, J. Shewnarane, M. Vo, J. Taggart, M. Goudreault, B. Muskat, C. Alfarano, D. Dewar, Z. Lin, K. Michalickova, A. R. Willems, H. Sassi, P. A. Nielsen, K. J. Rasmussen, J. R. Andersen, L. E. Johansen, L. H. Hansen, H. Jespersen, A. Podtelejnikov, E. Nielsen, J. Crawford, V. Poulsen, B. D. Sorensen, J. Matthiesen, R. C. Hendrickson, F. Gleeson, T. Pawson, M. F. Moran, D. Durocher, M. Mann, C. W. Hogue, D. Figeys, and M. Tyers, "Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry," Nature, vol. 415, pp. 180-3, 2002.
[5] P. Uetz, L. Giot, G. Cagney, T. A. Mansfield, R. S. Judson, J. R. Knight, D. Lockshon, V. Narayan, M. Srinivasan, P. Pochart, A. Qureshi-Emili, Y. Li, B. Godwin, D. Conover, T. Kalbfleisch, G. Vijayadamodar, M. Yang, M. Johnston, S. Fields, and J. M. Rothberg, "A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae," Nature, vol. 403, pp. 623-7, 2000.
[6] S. Jones and J. M. Thornton, "Principles of protein-protein interactions," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, pp. 13-20, 1996.
[7] S. Jones and J. M. Thornton, "Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis," Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 272, pp. 133-143, 1997.
[8] S. Jones and J. M. Thornton, "Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches," Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 272, pp. 121-132, 1997.

被引用紀錄


李佑峰(2006)。經驗.知識.記憶--一位高中籃球教練的敘說探究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716104062
韋政宏(2010)。臺灣大專跆拳道選手武德認知與行為之相關研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315190989
王貞治(2012)。桃園縣國中乙級籃球代表隊教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315270007
陳奕縢(2013)。游泳教練領導行為對學習滿意度與游泳成效之探討-以僑泰中學為例〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201314042345
吳啟明(2016)。一位優秀足球教練之領導行為〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614043306

延伸閱讀