透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.141.6
  • 學位論文

一個結合TOPSIS與AHP的網路服務信任評估機制

A Web Services Trust Evaluation Mechanism Using TOPSIS and AHP

指導教授 : 羅濟群

摘要


隨著網路服務所提供的功能越來愈多且複雜,其資訊安全的問題也日益受到重視,目前網路服務的安全多集中於傳輸的安全性上,並未考慮到服務內容與安全性以外的問題。有鑑於此,本論文提出之“網路服務信任評估機制(Web Services Trust Evaluation Mechanism, WSTEM)”,選擇適當的網路服務評估準則(Criteria),同時考慮主觀與客觀的安全因子,以使用者的安全要求為基礎,結合理想解類似度偏好順序評估調整法(Modified Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Method, TOPSIS)與層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)於網路服務信任值計算,不同於以往結合TOPSIS與AHP之應用,我們所提出的機制,考慮到使用者的主觀意見,加入使用者回饋與修正。在系統模擬實驗中,本論文模擬一可支援WSTEM之信任網路服務推薦系統(Trusted Web Services Recommendation System),由模擬結果可發現,在惡意服務比例為10%、50%時,應用WSTEM與未應用WSTEM相比,正確推薦達100%,在惡意服務比例高達90%時,推薦錯誤率僅10%,故本機制可有效推薦具安全性的網路服務予使用者。

並列摘要


In recent years, the Web Services (WS) is becoming more complex and popular, and the security issues are also important. However, the WS Security standards only support the WS transaction security in the transmission, do not consider the WS content and other issue, such as reliability and so on. In this thesis, we propose a novel Web Services Trust Evaluation Mechanism (WSTEM) which uses appropriate WS evaluation criteria and considers the security factors in subjective and objective. WSTEM is based on the user’s WS-Security requirement, which uses Modified Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Method (TOPSIS) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to compute the trust value of WS, it is different from other applications also use TOPSIS and AHP. Because it considers user preferences, adds user feedback and trust value revision for trusted WS recommendation. The simulation result shows that WSTEM outforms to the orginal study, by increasing the proportion of insecure service is 10% and 50%, that are recommend correct. When the proportion of insecure service is 90%, the recommend error rate is just 10%. Therefore, WSTEM can recommend secure and trusted services to users.

參考文獻


[19] 畢威寧,「結合AHP與TOPSIS法於供應商績效評估之研究」,科學與工程技術期刊,第一卷第一期,75-83頁,2005年。
[3] S. Cheng, C.W. Chan, G.H. Huang, “Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Supporting Decision of Solid Waste Management,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 37(6), pp. 975–990, 2002.
[4] Metin Dağdeviren, Serkan Yavuz, and Nevzat Kılınç, “Weapon Selection Using the AHP and TOPSIS Methods under Fuzzy Environment,” Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), pp. 8143-8151, 2009.
[5] Schahram Dustdar and Martin Treiber, “A View Based Analysis on Web Service Registries,” Distributed and Parallel Databases, 8(2), pp. 147-171, 2005.
[6] Ching-Lai Hwang, Kwangsun Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey, Springer-Verlag , New York, 1981.

被引用紀錄


陳寶雲(2012)。技藝競賽關鍵成功因素之探討〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613504064
楊華雯(2013)。消費者網路購買產物保險之關鍵因素:分析層級程序法 (AHP)〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613554852
陳秋燕(2016)。以模糊平衡計分卡探討企業績效排名〔碩士論文,國立臺北商業大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0064-0901201715233604

延伸閱讀