由歐盟航空碳排放交易機制之發展論國際航空溫室氣體排放全球市場措施機制之建構

The Construction of A Global Market-based Measure Scheme Addressing Emissions from International Aviation: Inspiration from EU Aviation ETS

戴楷恩(Kai-En Tai)

指導教授 ： 倪貴榮 ； 薛景文

國立交通大學/科技法律學院/科技法律研究所/碩士(2016年)

摘要

2009年2月生效之第2008/101號指令（歐盟航空碳排放交易機制），特色是將所有到達、離開歐盟境內機場的民用航班，其整個航程的二氧化碳排放納入歐盟碳排放交易機制（European Union Emissions Trading Scheme，EU ETS）之碳排放規制範圍，等同於將EU ETS之規制效力延伸至歐盟境外。歐盟並以國際間達成關於減少航空溫室氣體排放之全球措施的協議，作為其撤銷域外適用之條件。此項氣候變化政策是歐盟對於各國在國際規範上消極不作為的回應。然而歐盟航空碳排放交易機制受到國際間強烈的反彈。因國際間的反對聲浪，並考量到國際民用航空組織（ICAO）場域對「全球市場措施機制」（global market-based measure scheme）議題已有所進展，歐盟將第2008/101號指令之規制效力範圍限縮於歐洲經濟區（European Economic Area，EEA）領域內；但倘若2016年ICAO第39屆大會仍未形成關於全球市場措施之國際協議，則歐盟仍可能於2017年1月1日起，將規制效力範圍重新擴展至EEA領域外。
經本論文之分析，歐盟航空碳排放交易機制或無法主張合乎國際法之域外效力以正當化；此外，亦有違反WTO法下GATS之最惠國待遇與國民待遇原則以及GATT 1994之最惠國待遇原則之虞，且可能皆難以依一般例外正當化。是以，經由對第一手資料及研究文獻之分析，本論文將提出全球市場措施機制的建議方案及應建構形式，希望藉由此研究之提出，能夠對目前ICAO下關於全球市場措施機制之進展有所貢獻，以協助建構一和諧、穩定且考量多數國家利益的全球市場措施機制。
本論文並以半結構式深度訪談之質性研究方法，探討分析我國政府及航空器營運者，究以如何之立場與態度面對歐盟航空碳排放交易機制，是否受影響，又如何因應；此外，政府與航空產業又如何在全球機制形塑過程中於國際上扮演適當之角色，以因應日後可能的衝擊。

關鍵字

國際航空 ； 溫室氣體 ； 排放交易機制 ； 市場措施 ； 域外效力

並列摘要

Entering into force in February 2009, the Directive 2008/101/EC aims at regulating carbon dioxide emissions from all flights arriving at or departing from an aerodrome situated in the territory of a Member State. The Directive involves the application of the EU ETS to emissions that are generated outside the geographical scope of the EU, rendering this extraterritorial application contingent to the fact that an international agreement on global measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from aviation has been reached. This climate change policy is the response of the EU to the world-wide omission in the climate regime. However, the EU Aviation ETS had aroused fierce opposition among countries. Considering the wide opposition and the fact that substantive progress had been made by International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) on the issue of the global market-based measure (GMBM) scheme, the EU shrank the regulative scope of the Directive 2008/101/EC to the region of the European Economic Area (EEA). Nonetheless, if no agreement on a GMBM has been concluded during the session of the 39th ICAO Assembly in 2016, it is supposed that the EU Aviation ETS will regain its initial power to regulate emissions from flights taken place outside the EEA.
Through analyzing, this thesis holds that the EU Aviation ETS may not be justified by asserting an extraterritorial effect in line with the international law. Moreover, the EU scheme may be inconsistent not only with both the obligations of the most-favoured nation (MFN) treatment and the national treatment incorporated in the GATS, but also the MFN treatment obligation in the GATT 1994 under the WTO law, and may hardly be justified under the General Exceptions. Therefore, by analyzing primary sources and research literature, the thesis will bring up proposals both on the design features of the GMBM and the proper legal instruments that could be used to establish the global scheme. The findings and proposals of this thesis may contribute to the progress on the issue of the GMBM within ICAO, helping construct a harmonized and stabilized global scheme that takes into account interests of most countries.
By using a qualitative research method under which semi-structured in-depth interviews are conducted, the thesis explores the stances of both the Taiwan government and aircraft operators and their attitudes toward the EU Aviation ETS, the impacts of the EU scheme on them, and their responses. Through the interviews, a study is also conducted to identify appropriate roles the Taiwan government and aircraft operators may play during the process of the development of the global scheme, in order for them to adapt to potential future impacts.

並列關鍵字

international aviation ； greenhouse gas ； emissions trading scheme ； market-based measure ； extraterritorial effect

參考文獻

[1] 施文真，〈國際環境公約下之處理不遵約機制〉，《臺灣國際法季刊》，第3卷第4期，頁7-77，2006年12月。

[47] Tunteng, Verki Michael et al, Legal Analysis on the Inclusion of Civil Aviation in the European Union Emissions Trading System, 17, Centre for Int’l Sustainable Dev. Law, available at http://cisdl.org/public/docs/news/CISDL_EU_ETS_Expansion_Legal_Brief.pdf.

[3] BROWNLIE, IAN, PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (6th ed. 2003).

[4] DOVER, ROBERT & JUSTIN FROSINI, THE EXTRATERRITORIAL EFFECTS OF LEGISLATION AND POLICIES IN THE EU AND US (2012).

[5] HANDL, GÜNTHER et al., BEYOND TERRITORIALITY: TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL AUTHORITY IN AN AGE OF GLOBALIZATION (2012).