透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.143.0.157
  • 學位論文

天台圓教之淨土義與人間淨土之修證實踐

The Tientai perfect teaching teaches pure land righteousness and the world pure land repair the card and the practice

指導教授 : 李瑞全
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


論文名稱:天台圓教之淨土義與人間淨土之修證實踐 校所組別:國立中央大學哲學研究所 畢業時間及提要別:九十九學年度第二學期 博士 研究生:林妙貞 指導教授:李瑞全博士 論文提要內容: 本文主要透過探究天台圓教之淨土觀,除簡別天台圓教之淨土觀與傳統淨土思想於理念、目的與實踐方法上之異同外,進一步探究天台圓教於「淨土」與「究竟涅槃」之關係思想,以及對於「淨土」之「權實」問題之闡釋。其次,藉由說明當代人間淨土之三種認知,從而闡明天台圓教於「人間」與「淨土」之關係,即由淨土經典所引發此方(穢)與彼方(淨)之殊異背離,如何由天台圓教「一念無明法性心即具三千」思想圓融詮解,進而突顯天台圓教於「人間淨土」之實義乃「人間即淨土」。最後,並說明天台圓教之即于人間具體修證觀行(實踐)之「人間性」特質與精神。

並列摘要


The article main penetration inquired into the Tientai perfect teaching teaches the pure land view, teaches the pure land view and the traditional pure land thought except the Jan other Tientai perfect teaching in the idea, the goal and the practice method outside the similarities and differences, further inquired into the Tientai perfect teaching does teach in “the pure land” and “actually the nirvana” the relational thought, as well as regarding “pure land” it “simplified and full teachings” explanation question.Next, third kind of cognitions because of explanation present age world pure land, thus expounded the Tientai perfect teaching teaches in “the world” and “the pure land” the relations, namely initiates this side (filthily) by the pure land classics with other side (only) the far different deviation, “As soon as the heart and bright Buddhist-nature heart namely 3000 law” the thought perfect teaching to melt the annotation solution, then reveals the Tientai perfect teaching to teach in “the world pure land” the reality righteousness is suddenly “the world is the pure land”.Finally, and explained the Tientai perfect teaching teaches namely to repair the card view line specifically in the world (practice) it “the world” the special characteristic and the spirit.

參考文獻


牟宗三,1996,《圓善論》,台北:學生書局,初版。
釋太虛,財團法人印順文教基金會輯,2005,《太虛大師全書》,新竹市:財團法人印順文教基金會,光碟版。
釋印順,財團法人印順文教基金會輯,1999,《印順法師佛學著作集》,新竹市:財團法人印順文教基金會,光碟版。
釋昭慧,1998,《佛教倫理學》,台北市:法界出版社。
釋昭慧,2003,《佛教規範倫理學》,台北市:法界出版社。

延伸閱讀