論羈押期間之限制

By takes into custody limit the period

施玉春(Shih Yuchun)

指導教授 ： 柯耀程

國立中正大學/法學院/法律學系/碩士(2012年)

摘要

人權，是普世的價值，是根植於人類的道德觀；尊重司法，加強司法機關之權責，以保障人民之權利，乃現代法治國家之目標。然而，國家為實施刑罰權，在發見真實的過程中，很容易逾越人權保障的界線，產生衝突。

羈押是對人身自由最嚴厲且衝擊最大的強制處分，洵羈押制度為犯罪偵查的手段之一，屬於國家刑權權之一環。刑罰權之行使，起自偵查、追訴、審判及刑的執行，此一連串的刑事司法程序，限制或剝奪人身自由之強制措施，乃為最常運用的刑事訴究手段。

國家是為保障人民的權利而設，如何在維護人民權利、法律制序之安定下，透過公平的司法程序，貫徹憲法之平等精神，保護及尊重人民尊嚴與權利，暨防止誤判，俾以發現真實，成為刑事訴訟的重要課題。由於羈押剝奪人身自由，長期以來受到關注。以我國近代司法上兩起著名的刑事案件，陸正案及蘇建和案為例，啟發吾人的深思：為何一件刑事案件歷經二十多年的審理，仍無法確定判決？是警檢證據調查不足，抑或是法院審理的怠惰延宕？為何羈押期間可以長達二十多年，甚至淪為無限期羈押？究竟是法律面的問題，或是制度運作面司法人員的問題？許多的疑問有待解開。

基於對人權保障之關懷，開啟吾人對現行法有關「羈押期間之限制」的關切。故本論文，首先將從人權保障為出發，探討其與刑事發見真實之衝突；次之，以羈押之程序作用，論述羈押期間之限制的問題；再次之，2010年4月23日立法院三讀通過刑事妥速審法，包括限縮審判中刑事案件被告羈押期限、及檢察官上訴權，將探討刑事妥速審法之施行後，對現行羈押期限規定之衝擊；末者，對現行羈押實務運作進行檢討，以作為未來相關法律修法之建議。

關鍵字：羈押、人權保障、發見真實、強制處分、羈押期間、羈押期間限制、刑事妥速審判法、妥速審

關鍵字

刑事妥速審法 ； 羈押期間限制 ； 羈押期間 ； 強制處分 ； 發見真實 ； 人權保障 ； 羈押 ； 妥速審

並列摘要

Human rights, are the Pu world value, is rooted in humanity's moral outlook; The respect judicature, power and responsibility of the enhancement judicial organ, safeguards right of the people's, is goal of the modern country under the rule of law. However, the country for the implementation penalty power, in sends sees in the real process, very easy to overstep the human rights safeguard the demarcation line, has the conflict.

Takes into custody is severest to the personal freedom also attacks the biggest compulsion punishment, truly takes into custody the system one of for crime detection methods, belongs to of a link country punishment power power. Line of the penalty power causes, to get up from the detection, investigates, the trial and the punishment execution, this a succession of criminal activity judicial process, the limit or deprives of precautionary measure the personal freedom, is sues for most often the utilization criminal activity investigates the method.

The country is for safeguards people's right to suppose, how in defends the people's right, stability of under the legal system foreword, penetrates the fair judicial process, equality of spirit the implementation constitution, protects and respects the people's dignity and the right, up to prevents the miscarriage of justice, enables discovers really, becomes the criminal prosecution the important topic. Because takes into custody deprives the personal freedom, since long ago receives the attention. Take our country modern times judicature in two famous criminal cases, Liu Chen case and Su Chien huo and the document as examples, inspires our thinking deeply: Why does a criminal case have been through repeatedly more than 20 years trying, still was unable to determine the decision? Is the police examines the evidence investigation insufficiency, or is court trying lazy delays? Why takes into custody the period may long amount to for more than 20 years, even degenerates into unlimited time takes into custody? Actually is the legal surface question, perhaps system operation surface judicature personnel's question? Many question pendings unties.

Based on to concern the human rights safeguard, opens us related “takes into custody limit the period” to the lex lata the concern. Therefore the present paper, for will embark first from the human rights safeguard, discusses it to send with the criminal activity sees the real conflict; The next best, takes into custody the procedure function, the elaboration takes into custody limit the period question; Again is next, in April 23，2010 3rd reads examines the consideration to pass the criminal proper trial law, including limits shrinks in the trial the criminal case defendant to take into custody the deadline, and the public prosecutor appeal right, after will discuss the criminal activity properly fast to examine execution the law, to present will take into custody impact the deadline stipulation; End, to present takes into custody the practice operation to carry on the self-criticism, by will be connected the law as the future to repair suggestion the law.

Key words:
Takes into custody, The human rights safeguard, Sends sees real, The compulsion punishment, Takes into custody the period, Takes into custody the period limit, Criminal proper trial law, Fast examines

並列關鍵字

Takes into custody the period limit ； Takes into custody the period ； The compulsion punishment ； Sends sees real ； The human rights safeguard ； Takes into custody ； Criminal proper trial law ； Fast examines

參考文獻

28. 陳志龍，檢察官之偵查與檢察制度，法務部編印，1998年3月。

15. 臺灣人權促進會網站http：//www.tahr.org.tw

9. 大法官釋字第530號解釋文。

11. 大法官釋字第523號解釋。

12. 大法官釋字第525號解釋理由書。