毒品犯、暴力犯及竊盜犯智力與情緒商數之比較研究-以法務部矯正署嘉義監獄為例

林慶福(LIN CING FU)

指導教授 ： 楊士隆

國立中正大學/教育學院/犯罪防治學系/碩士(2012年)

摘要

摘要

本研究主要目的在暸解不同背景毒品犯、暴力犯及竊盜犯在智力與情緒商數上之差異情形；分析不同犯罪類型之智力與情緒商數的差異情形；探究毒品犯、暴力犯及竊盜犯之智力與情緒商數的直接關係；檢定毒品犯、暴力犯及竊盜犯智力與情緒商數結構方程模式之適配情形。
為達成上述目的，本研究採用問卷調查法，編製「情緒商數調查問卷」進行調查，以在法務部矯正署嘉義監獄服刑的毒品犯、暴力犯及竊盜犯為研究對象，抽取毒品犯、暴力犯及竊盜犯共1120位受刑人。回收996份有效問卷，回收率為88.93％；搜集的資料以描述統計分析、多變量分析與結構方程模式等統計方法進行分析與處理。獲得結論如下：
一、不同排行、年齡、教育程度、家庭每月總收入的受刑人，在智力上的得分皆有顯著差異，顯示個人、學校與家庭環境因素會影響受刑人的智力。
二、不同宗教信仰的受刑人，在智力上的得分沒有顯著差異。
三、不同宗教信仰與家庭每月總收入的受刑人，在情緒商數上的得分有顯著差異，顯示個人信仰與家庭環境會影響受刑人的情緒商數。
四、不同排行、年齡、教育程度的受刑人，在情緒商數上的得分沒有顯著差異。
五、毒品犯、暴力犯與竊盜犯受刑人在智力與情緒商數的得分皆達顯
著差異：
（一）毒品犯、暴力犯與竊盜犯受刑人在智力上的得分有顯著的差異，智力量表的平均得分最高為「毒品犯」，其次為「暴力犯」，平均得分最低為「竊盜犯」。
（二）毒品犯、暴力犯與竊盜犯受刑人在「整體情緒商數」量表上的得分有顯著差異，平均得分最高為「毒品犯」，其次為「竊盜犯」，平均得分最低為「暴力犯」。
六、毒品犯、暴力犯與竊盜犯受刑人的智力與情緒商數之間，具有正
向的直接影響關係。
七、毒品犯、暴力犯和竊盜犯的智力與情緒商數的結構方程模式之適
配性檢定獲得支持，表示受刑人之智力對於情緒商數具有預測作
用。
最後，依據上述研究結論，提出相關建議，以提供教育輔導機關及未來研究之參考。

關鍵字

毒品犯 ； 暴力犯 ； 竊盜犯 ； 智力 ； 情緒商數

並列摘要

Abstract

The main purposes of this research are to understand the current situations of drug offenders, violent offenders and theft offenders, to analyze the differences among drug offenders, violent offenders and theft offenders in personal variables. Furthermore, it explores the relationships among drug offenders, violent offenders and theft offenders' emotional quotient. Finally, it assesses the proper fit of the structural equation model among these groups intelligence and emotional quotient.
To achieve the purposes, this research adopts a questionnaire survey. “The investigative questionnaire of relationships among drug offenders, violent offenders and theft offenders' emotional quotient”, is the main tool in use. The samples were 1,120 criminals selected from Chiayi Prison, Agency of Corrections, Ministry of Justice, and 996 of the distributed copies were returned as valid. The return rate was 88.93%.
A series of statistical methods such as descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance, and structural equation model, are conducted to analyze the data collected. The conclusions of this research are as follows:
1.The different rank, age, educational level and total monthly family
income of drug offenders, violent offenders and theft offenders'
intelligence was significant differences. Environment factors of
personal, school and family that may affect the intelligence of the
inmates.
2.The different religious beliefs of drug offenders, violent offenders and
theft offenders' intelligence was not significant differences.
3.The different religious beliefs and total monthly family income of drug offenders, violent offenders and theft offenders' emotional quotient were significant differences. Personal beliefs and family environment will affect the emotional quotient of the inmates.
4.The different rank, age and educational level of drug offenders, violent offenders and theft offenders' emotional quotient was not significant differences.
5. Score of different inmates in the intelligence and emotional quotient are significant differences:
(1) Different types of crimes the inmates there are significant
differences in score on the intelligence scale, the highest average score for " drug offenders ", followed by violent offenders , the lowest average score is theft offenders.
(2) The inmates of different types of crime on the scale of the overall emotional quotient score was a significant difference, the highest average score for" drug offenders ", followed by " theft offenders”, the lowest average score for "violent offenders".
6. Drug offenders, violent offenders and theft offenders' intelligence results were emotional quotient have significant impact and direct effects.
7. The drug offenders, violent offenders and theft offenders' intelligence and emotional quotient structure side adaptation of the test process model for support. Indicate that intelligence of inmates forecasts for
emotional quotient.
Based on research findings, relevant recommendations, to provide education and counseling agencies and research future reference.

並列關鍵字

drug offenders ； violent offenders ； theft offenders ； intelligence ； emotional quotient

參考文獻

王淑俐 (1995) 。青少年情緒的問題、研究與對策。台北： 合記。

李娟娟（2006）。婚姻中性暴力及其他暴力受害女性自尊、情緒與創傷後反應之研究。未出版碩士，樹德科技大學人類性學研究所，高雄縣。

周震歐（1973）。犯罪心理學。自印。

周震歐（1993）。犯罪心理學。台北。大通。

許春金（1996）。犯罪學。台北：三民。