Analysts can convey information to investors through stock recommendations, target price forecasts, and earnings forecasts in research reports. This study uses reports released by analysts on listed companies from 2007 to 2020 as samples and aims to explore whether investors' reactions to analysts' reports revisions have strengthened or weakened when the market is in an ambiguous situation, and further distinguish the level of ambiguity for comparison. The empirical results show that ambiguity reduces the impact of analysts' stock recommendations on investors when the samples are not distinguished. However, when further distinguishing between high and low levels of ambiguity, there is no evidence that ambiguity causes a change in the impact of analysts' forecasts on investors in the low ambiguity sample, but in the high ambiguity sample, ambiguity weakens the impact of analysts' stock recommendations and earnings forecasts on investors, and ambiguity enhances the impact of target prices on investors.