台灣許多問題都不在法律而在執行,導致自民國64年以來,國土規劃管制體系不足及土地使用管制成效不彰,為解決沉苛的問題,2015年立法院通過「海洋管理法」、「濕地保育法」與「國土計畫法」等三法案的國土三法,是我國國土規劃最上法,全國土地重新畫設,攸關國土永續發展及土地使用秩序,過去《區域計畫法》雖明定可以控管都市計畫土地,但實質上,並未真正嘗試去指導都市計畫,《國土計畫法》已補強這個問題,讓國土保育與經濟發展雙贏,彰顯土地永續經營的價值,本研究就《國土計畫法》國土功能分區的「農業發展地區」類別中,探討檢視為國家糧食安全、農地有效益的利用,管制農地作農業使用等相關措施,並研擬建議,加強農地整體開發,為未來產業發展儲備用地時,也能預留優良農地,保障農業發展,變更目標使用,運用創新科技,落實完善的土地利用規劃與管制政策,以對國土計畫後續的變革提供建議方向。
Many issues we felt so difficult to work in Taiwan is not because of making laws. Executing law was the key point. That consequence had resulted in national spatial planning system were insufficient and land use control were ineffective since 1975. In order to solve those problem, legislature of government legislated ” Coastal Zone Management Act”, “Wetland Conservation Act” and “Spatial Planning Act” in 2015. These acts are in National Spatial Planning up position. All national land was redesigned and replanned that was related to land sustainable development and regular utilization. In the past, Regional Planning Act could clearly control the urban land, but in fact, it never tried to guide urban planning. Spatial Planning Act has solved the problem and reinforced effect. It made a win-win situation on land conservation and economic development. Also, it demonstrated the value of sustainable management. This study focused on “Agricultural Development Area” which was classified in Spatial Planning Act. It discussed some direction, including security of state grain, effective use of agricultural land, and how to control agricultural land for agricultural use. The recommendations formulated at last. First, agricultural land strengthened overall development. Agricultural land reserved state grain for the future development, also reserved good farmland. Second, agriculture development would be ensured and innovative technology would be adopted. That would completely implement land planning and policies. The results of this study provided suggestions and directions for the follow-up transform of the national spatial plan.