透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.114.38
  • 學位論文

南菜園古蹟失火與社區拼裝:火的物質性與社會關係轉向

Assemblage of South Vegetable-Garden Historic on Wildfire and Community:The Materiality of Fire Divert Social Relations

指導教授 : 王驥懋

摘要


本研究透過「前南菜園日式宿舍古蹟失火」現象,考察失火後行動者與非人 行動者拼裝,來探究火的物質性,是如何影響整個 assemblage 動態拼裝的過程。 本研究透過參與式觀察追蹤行動者與訪談 11 位事件的行動者,我指出臺北市象 徵資本迴路有兩種,一種是文化局由上到下治理模式,一種是都發局與更新處由 下到上治理模式。此外,火的物質性如何在日常生活給人意想不到的驚喜 (surprise),物質性造成偶然性事件又如何打開政治空間、影響行動者與專家技 術的進入,以及資本迴路轉變,改變整個 assemblage 的拼裝,說明火的能動性與 行動者拼裝過程。本文的研究發現如下:首先,我討論了火擁有自己的屬性,而 非組成元素屬性的總和、進而產生人無法預期的偶然性事件。接著,發生無法預 期的失火意外,但因無法了解火的其他特性,從而推派整起事件代言人使物質性 回歸到日常生活的樣貌。繼而,我討論火的「能動性(agency)」是如何改變「整 起事件的走向」。此外,能動性在不同 assemblage 有不同的差異,並非像物質性 只有唯一本質,所以要打開 assemblage 看到物能動性作用。我指出失火後打開整 個古蹟修復政治空間,讓 assemblage 從領域化與物質性屬性轉為去領域化與表達 性屬性,加入更多行動者,這些行動者透過協商過程,得出古蹟修復樣貌與再利 用皆可以接受的答案,並因行動者的動員,將古蹟資本迴路從文化局主導模式轉 為都發局模式,使古蹟以「社區化」方向修復。此外,失火導致修復技術的差異, 失火需要專家技術的進入,又改變整個 assemblage 的屬性,轉為物質性與領域化 的,專家技術的進入,來說明 assemblage 在何時會因關鍵行動者加入或脫離而邁 向另一個階段(stage)。同時,技術與 assemblage 之間行動者緊密相連,導致建 築技術執行產生差異。在都市日常生活 assemblage 維持同一屬性,當有行動者或 非人行動者進入或脫離後,assemblage 如屬性轉換,既是走向另一個階段(stage)。

關鍵字

物質性 能動性 拼裝 文化資產 資本迴路

並列摘要


This study explores the materiality of fire and how it affects the dynamic assemblage process with the use of assemblage through the phenomenon of "fire in the Japanese-style Dormitory of the Former South Vegetable Garden" and the assemblage of actors and non-actors after the fire. There are two kinds of symbolic Capital Circuit in Taipei, one is the top-down governance mode of the Cultural Bureau, the other is the bottom-up governance mode of the Capital Bureau and the renewal Department. The fire, which not the sum of the attributes of its constituent elements, has its own attributes, and therefore produces unexpected contingencies. Then, unexpected fire accidents occur, but because of the inability to understand the other characteristics of fire, push the whole event spokesperson to bring the materiality back to the appearance of daily life. Agency differs in different assemblage. It is not as if materiality has only one essence, so we should enter the assemblage to see the motion effect of objects. The fire opened up the political space for the restoration of the whole monument. The assemblage changes from the territorialization and material properties to the deterritorialization and expressive properties with the introduction of more actors. The Capital Circuit of historic sites was changed from the dominant mode of cultural bureau to the mode of urban development Bureau, so the historic sites were restored in the direction of "community". Misfires lead to differences in repair techniques. Fire needs the entry of expert technology, change the attribute of whole Assemblage again, convert materiality and territorialization. Assemblage sets up a stage at which key actors join or depart. At the same time, the connection between the technology and actors in assemblage leads to the divergence in the implementation of architectural technologies. The same attribute of assemblage is maintained in urban daily life. After the actor or the non-actor enter or leave the assemblage. When the attribute of assemblage transformation, it is the next stage.

參考文獻


Bloor, D.、艾彥譯 (2001)。知識與社會意象。北京:東方。
Harvey, D.(2007)。巴黎, 現代性之都。:Qun xue chu ban you xian gong si。 Jacobs, J.、吳鄭重(2007)。偉大城市的誕生與衰亡: 美國都市街道生活的啟發。
台北: 聯經出版事業股份有限公司。
Landry, C. (2014)。《創意平台:臺北,邁向城市 3 0 中文版》。
文建會 (1999)。 文化政策白匹書。

延伸閱讀