台灣機械產業競爭力與結構變化之分析

A Study of Competitiveness and Structural Change in Taiwan’s Machinery Industry

曾柏翰(Po-Han Tseng)

指導教授 ： 洪振義

朝陽科技大學/管理學院/財務金融系/碩士(2011年)

摘要

本研究以競爭力指標，首先運用顯示性比較利益指數及貿易專業化指數瞭解產業之間的競爭力強弱，以產業內貿易指數來探討產業之間的貿易型態及分工程度，再以產業關聯的要因分解來說明台灣的機械與運輸部門的成長因素為何。
根據實證結果顯示，台灣的精密機械產業最具競爭力，中國是一般機械較有優勢，東亞各國的電氣機械與運送機械為其強項。由競爭力指標的變化得知台灣機械產品的出口有其優勢，所以由成長要因模型的計算得知，台灣的機械部門與運輸工具部門最主要是出口效果與國內最終需要效果的變化，而投入技術的減低，對機械產業的發展有不利的影響，值得我們改進。
面對中國與東亞各國的低階標準化產品及高階精密產品的壓力，台灣
應創造適合機械產業發展的環境，並努力提升產品的品質和技術的研發，才能在競爭激烈的國際貿易中取得一席之地。

關鍵字

產業關聯分析 ； 顯示性比較利益指數 ； 產業內貿易指數 ； 貿易專業化指數

並列摘要

In this study, we use the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) index and Trade Specialization Index to understand the intra-industry’s Competitive advantage, Investigate intra-industry’s Trade patterns and international co-production by using the Index of Intra-industry Trade. That explains Taiwan''s machinery and Traffic department''s growth factor by input-output analysis.

Our empirical results show that Taiwan’s precision machinery of industry had the most competitive strength, China’s general machinery of industry had competitive strength, the electrical machinery and transportation machinery of industry had competitive strength on countries of East Asian. According to growth factor by input-output analysis, Taiwan’s machinery and Traffic department''s changed by export effect and Domestic demands , we needs to Increase Into technology otherwise that will be not good for industry’s developing.

To face low-level standardization products and high-level precision products of China and countries of East Asian, Taiwan Government should creates better Environment of machinery and upgrades

並列關鍵字

Input-output analysis ； Trade Specialization Index ； Revealed Comparative Advantage index (RCA) ； Index of Intra-industry Trade

參考文獻

1. Akamatsu (1962) ,“A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries ”,The Developing Economics ,Vol.1,pp.3-25.

2. Balassa (1966),“Tariff Reductions and Trade in Manufactures among Industrial Countries”, American Economics Review, Vol.56, No.3, pp.466-473.

3. Bowen H. P. (1983), “On the Theoretical Interpretation of Indices of Trade Intensity and Revealed Comparative Advantage”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol.119, pp.464-472.

4. Bowen H. P. (1985), “On Measuring Comparative Advantage: A Reply and Extention ”,Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 121, pp.351-354.

6. Engelbrecht H.J.(1992),“Australia’s Industrial R&D Experniture and Foreign Trade”,Applied Economic, Vol.24, pp.545-556.