高職餐飲管理科學生學習風格之研究：就讀公私立學校學生之比較

Students’ Preferred Learning Styles: A Study of The Vocational High School Students Majoring in Food and Beverage Management

張雅芳(Ya-Fang Chang)

指導教授 ： 何昶鴛

朝陽科技大學/管理學院/休閒事業管理系/碩士(2013年)

摘要

由於每年就讀高職餐飲管理科學生人數眾多（已超過6萬人），復因班別複雜（設有普通班、輪調式建教班以及實用技能班），加上公私立學校的學生入學門檻的差異性（反映其國中階段的學習成就），探討其學習情況具有重要的意義。而瞭解學生的學習風格(Learning style)則是瞭解學生的學習情況的方式之一。本研究的研究目的在探討公私立高職餐飲管理科學生學習風格分佈情形，並比較就讀不同班別之學生之學習風格，以及其就讀後其學習風格改變的情形。

本研究以南投縣一所私立(簡稱A校)與台中市一所公立(簡稱B校)高職餐飲管理科為研究個案，以兩校98學年度入學之學生做為研究對象，選取A校學生學號為雙號者，並且100學年度仍就學者，以及B校100學年度全部就學學生作為研究樣本。本研究以問卷作為研究工具，主要內容為Kolb(1999) 第三版學習風格量表；其中A校進行縱貫性的研究分析（Longitudinal study），前後2次調查的時間相距2年。

本研究的主要研究結果如下：

1.AB兩校學生的學習風格分佈情況，皆以擴散型學習風格最多、調適型次之、聚斂型與同化型最少；但二校學生在四種學習風格型態的分佈比例並不相同。

2.雖然AB二校學生的學習風格皆以擴散型與調適型佔絕大多數，但同所學校就讀不同班別的學生其學習風格分佈情況不同；A校普通班以擴散型近六成，實用技能班以擴散型佔五成，但輪調班則是調適型近五成；B校普通班以擴散型與調適型分佈接近，實用技能班則是擴散型佔五成。將二校就讀普通班學生加以比較，其學習風格型態的分佈情況不同；但實用技能班學生則是相似。

3.A校學生有42%在就讀二年後改變其學習風格；顯示學習風格雖具有穩定性，但也會因學習環境與後天培養而有所改變。

本研究根據研究結果提出後續研究建議，並提出高職餐飲管理系科在教學方式與課程設計之建議，作為教師教學與輔導學生之參考。

關鍵字

高職餐飲管理科學生 ； 學習風格

並列摘要

Due to a large number of students (over 60,000 per year) majoring in Food and Beverage Management (FBM) in the vocational high schools, the investigation into their learning conditions cannot be overemphasized while the complication of programs and the diversity of the entrance criteria of public and private schools (standing for students’ learning achievements at junior-high-school stage) are taken into consideration. To explore students’ learning styles is one of the ways to gain a better understanding of students’ learning. The objectives of this study include: (1) Identifying the distribution of dominant learning styles displayed by the FBM vocational high school students between the public and private schools; (2) Identifying differences in learning preferences enrolled in the different programs of the students; (3) Examining the changes of the preferred learning styles before-and-after enrollment.

This study takes a private school (labeled School A) in Nantou County and a public school (labeled School B) in Taichung City as the study cases. The subjects were the FBM students who were enrolled in August, 2010 and still registered in August, 2012 in both schools. Besides, in School A, the sample was selected from the students with even student ID number and the sample in School B comprised all the FBM students. The study employed survey research methods for data collection. The survey included a standardized Learning Style Inventory (LSI) and questions related to the individual characteristics. Especially in School A, A longitudinal study was conducted in School A to collect data over two-year period.

The main results of this study are as following:

1. The research results indicated that most of the students fell into- Kolb’s Diverger category, the lesser were labeled Accommodators, and there were small groups of Assimilators and Convergers.

2. At the same school, the distribution of students’ learning styles in different programs is quite different. Comparing the students of regular programs in the two schools, the distribution of students’ learning styles is different. However, that in the practical skill programs was similar.

3. Forty-two percent of the sample enrolled the 12th grade in School A changed their learning styles after two-year studying. It shows that learning styles have been nurtured by the learning environment though they may be natured.

Finally, from a practical standpoint, several managerial implications are proposed for teaching methods and curriculum design. Institutions offering and developing programs should be prepared to address learning style issues.

Key words: Learning style, Food and Beverage Management students

並列關鍵字

Food and Beverage Management students ； Learning style

參考文獻

王衍(2005)。國小英語教師學習與教學風格之研究。台中教育大學學報：人文藝術類，19(2)，71-88。

王雅玲(2009)。高職餐飲管理科學生校外實習成效之影響因素探討。

王雅玲、何昶鴛(2010，5月)。高職餐飲管理科學生學習風格之探討。

胡夢蕾、李怡君(2004)。人格特質、學習型態與學習表現關係之研究-以台灣餐旅教育學生為例。觀光研究學報，10，1-22。

張晉昌、黃學堂(2008)。高職學生不同學習風格對數位學習成效影響之研究。技術及職業教育學報，2(1)，37-57。