透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.252.37
  • 學位論文

大學生家庭型態及社經地位對營養知識、營養態度及飲食行為相關之研究-以南開科技大學為例

A Study of Family Types, Social Position, Nutrition Knowledge, Attitudes, and Dietary Practices: An Example of Nan Kai University of Technology

指導教授 : 陳宗玄
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在瞭解大學生的營養知識、態度及飲食行為之現況,並探討不同家庭社經背景的大學生在養知識、態度及飲食行為知差異情形,最後探討三者間的交互關係。本研究共計發放問卷700份,回收有效問卷回收數為577,有效問卷回收率達82.6%。所得資料以描述性統計獨立樣本t 檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關分析後,研究結果為:一、營養知識、營養態度及飲食行為呈正向中上程度得分。二、「民生學院」的學生在營養態度整體及各分構面上明顯優於其他學院的學生;家庭型態為核心家庭(雙親)的學生在營養態度之「飲食價值觀」構面上明顯優於單親家庭的學生;住宿自家的學生在營養態度之「進食與健康」構面上明顯優於校外租屋的學生;大四學生在「均衡飲食行為」及「注意標示與包裝」飲食行為分構面上明顯優於大一學生,而大一學生在「情緒性進食行為」分構面上則明顯優於大四學生;住宿情形為自家的學生在飲食行為之「均衡飲食行為」及「情緒性進食行為」構面上明顯優於住學校宿舍及校外租屋的學生。三、大學生營養知識、態度與飲食行為之關係呈正向相關性。

並列摘要


This study aimed to examine University student’s proper nutritional knowledge, attitude and dietary practice, their demographic statistic differences, the affecting factors and interaction among the three attributes. Quota sampling method was used to distribute 700 copies of self-edited questionnaires,and with 577 effective data or 82.6% response rate. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistical analysis, t-test analysis, One-way Anova, Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient analysis. The results were:1. University students overall dietary attitude showed positive attitude on nutritional knowledge, nutritional attitude and dietary practice. The College of Human Ecology universities were better than other College’s student on nutritional attitude;The nuclear family’s student were better than single parent on “dietary values”;Live their own’s student were better than Renting on“eating and health”; University of fourth graders were better than Freshman on“balanced diet”&“labeling and packaging”;Freshman were better than fourth graders on“Emotional Eating behavior”;Live their own’s student were better than Renting and School dormitory on “balanced diet”&“Emotional Eating behavior”. The result of University student’s nutritional knowledge, attitude and dietary practice showed significant relation.

參考文獻


行政院衛生署(2005)。臺灣地區2010年衛生指標白皮書。臺北市:行政院衛生署。
何智靖、賴香如、姚友雅(2009)。某技術學院學生飲食行為與其學校飲食政策和環境認知關係之研究。學校衛生,55,67-86。
李蘭、曾倩玲、陳光和、蕭淑真(1994)。台北縣正常發展之幼兒的問題飲食行為。中華民國學校衛生學會雜誌,13,95-104。
杭極敏、楊小淇、洪華君、陳立梅、徐彩莉、林薇(2009)。我國各級學校營養教育及飲食環境探討及建議(四):大專院校。臺灣營養學會雜誌,34(3),76-84。
張允中、林燕卿(2006)。單親家長對青春期子女“性”溝通之探討,中華輔導學報,20,175-200。

被引用紀錄


林進士(2015)。不同家庭型態教育支出影響因素之研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2502201617125260

延伸閱讀