- 學位論文
應用模糊多準則決策建構PCB工具評選模式
APPLYING FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR MODELING PCB TOOLS SELECTION
摘要
台灣電子產業現今在全球佔有著極重要的地位，選擇一個適合的PCB（Printed Circuit Board；印刷電路板）工具對企業來說是一件非常重要的事情。企業在面對挑選適合的PCB設計工具時，須要考慮許多的因素，方能作出正確的決策。 本研究探討面對PCB工具評選議題，應用模糊多準則決策方法（FMCDM），作為供應商評選之方法。參考國內外供應商評選模式之文獻探討與專家訪談，建構一評準則與架構，協助決策者在面對PCB工具評選問題時，能夠客觀且有效率的進行決策。 研究結果顯示 一、透過文獻搜集與專家訪談，整理出三大準則，軟體供應商、軟體功能、軟體技術；十四項次準則。1.價格、2.財務健全、3.軟體商規模、4.技術支援能力、5.研發創新能力、6.操作難易度、7.軟體功能、8.客製化容易度、9.符合內部製程要求、10.零件庫轉換、11.支援輸出入其他工具的格式、12.軟體執行效率、13.客戶指定使用的工具、14.公板來源使用該工具。 二、透過FMCDM分析方法，「軟體供應商」準則中，「技術支援能力」、「研發創新能力」為評選時最重要的次準則；「軟體功能」準則中，「操作難易度」、「軟體靈活性」為評選時最重要的次準則；「軟體技術」準則中，「軟體執行效率」為評選時最重要的次準則。而傳統大眾認為的「價格」在「軟體供應商」準則中被評為最不重要的因素。 三、經由專家評選後，S1、S2、S3、S4及S5這五套PCB設計工具中，以S1為最優先考量之軟體。
並列摘要
Taiwan's Electronics Industry has taken a leading place, select a good PCB tool is very important in a company. There are a lot of criteria need to think when company adapt to PCB Tool. They must think a lot relative criteria and make the right decision. The purpose of this study are facing PCB tool evaluation question, Applying FMCDM for survey software provider. Based on the literature and consulting experts to building the survey criteria and modeling, we hope that can provide an objectively and efficiently method for the decision maker when they facing PCB tool evaluation question. The result of this study was mentioned below: 1. By investigating current documentation and consulting experts, three main Criteria are “Software Provider”, “Software Function”, “Software Technology”; Fourteen Sub-Criteria are 1.”Price”, 2. “Finance Robustness”, 3.” Scale of Software Vendor”, 4.” Technology Support Capability”, 5.”R&D Innovation Capability”, 6.”Software Agility”, 7. “Operating Difficulty”, 8.”Customized Agility”, 9.”Meet internal manufacture requests”, 10.”Component Translate”, 11.”Support Import Other Tool’s Format”, 12.” Software Efficiency”, 13.“Request form Customer”, 14.”Same Format with Public Board” 2. This study has received the result after Using Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision analysis, “Technology Support Capability” and "R&D Innovation Capability" is most important sub-criteria in main criteria “Software Provider”. “Software Agility” and “Operating Difficulty” is most important sub-criteria in main criteria “Software Function”. “Software Efficiency” is most important sub-criteria in main criteria “Software Technology”. Traditional people think “Price” is the most important criteria but in this study, “Price” is the least important factor in main criteria “Software Provider”. 3. This study has received a result after a professional critical selection for PCB tools S1、S2、S3、S4、S5, S1 is the priority consideration.