透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.14.126.74
  • 學位論文

食安風暴事件後危機處理與消費者再購買意願關係之研究

A Study on the Relationship between Crisis Management and Consumers’ RepurchaseIntention after a Food Safety Incident

指導教授 : 李宗愷

摘要


食安風暴造成消費者的恐慌,如何重拾消費者對產品的信心,為廠商應於食安問題發生當下主動提供確實資訊給消費者,降低消費者之不確定性與風險,並透過退費等銷售手段,提升自身整體營運績效,同時與顧客重新建立關係。本研究採用SPSS的統計分析方法進行敘述性統計分析、單因子變異數分析、信效度分析、因素分析,分析不同族群的消費者在食安風暴所重視的因素,探討廠商在危機處理優劣是否與購買意願有顯著差異。本研究採實驗設計,模擬情境一為發生食安事件後,廠商加強包裝標示並出示政府的食品檢驗書;模擬情境二為發生食安事件後,廠商不做任何處理;模擬情境三為發生食安事件後,廠商對消費者做後續處理。本研究對象為一般民眾。根據分析的結果如下:結果發現情境2購買意願最低。境1及情境2有顯著差異,情境2及情境1跟3有顯著差異,情境3及情境2有顯著差異。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study is to understand how a manufacturer should regain consumer confidence and have customers re-purchase their products after a food safety incident. In this study, the SPSS statistical analysis method is used for a descriptive statistical analysis, reliability and validity analysis and single-factor variance analysis to analyze whether a manufacturer’s different crisis management methods will cause a significant difference in consumers’ repurchase intention. An experimental design is carried out in this study. In Scenario 1 the manufacturer enhances the package labeling and shows the Government's food inspection certificate after a food safety incident. In Scenario 2 the manufacturer does not do any thing after a food safety incident. In Scenario 3 the manufacturer launches a product promotion after a food safety incident. The objects of this study are the general public. The results are as follows: 1.Consumers in Scenario 2 have the lowest purchase intention. 2.There is a significant difference between the results in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. 3.There is a significant difference between the results in Scenario 2 and Scenarios 1 and 3. 4.There is a significant difference between the results in Scenario 3 and Scenario 2.

參考文獻


一、中文部分
王又鵬(1993),促銷活動對消費者購買行為影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所。
公平交易委員會(2015),《認識公平交易法》,增訂十六版。台北:公平交易委員會,104年7月。
丘昌泰。(2010)。危機預防與風險管理。研究論壇月刊,第77期,第11頁。
李志妤、石宏偉、張永平(2015),食品安全兒童食品廣告垃圾食品。新聞研究導刊。

延伸閱讀