目的:瞭解大學生的健康促進生活型態之現況並探討其社會人口學變項、自覺健康狀況與健康促進生活型態的關係。 方法:以結構式問卷進行,包括個人基本資料、自覺健康狀況量表(SF-36)及健康促進生活型態量表(HPLPII)。研究對象為台中某大學一年級學生,取得有效問卷1278份。以SPSS 12.0統計套裝軟體進行資料分析。 結果:健康促進生活型態總量表得分範圍在52至208分,平均得分為127.01。各量表之得分高低為「人際支持」、「靈性成長」、「壓力處置」、「營養」、「健康責任」和「運動」。自覺健康狀況(SF-36)和健康促進生活型態呈顯著正相關。在健康促進生活型態中,男生的運動得分高於女生,女生在人際支持高於男生;健康學院的學生,除靈性成長外其他皆有較優的表現。經逐步迴歸分析發現:自覺健康狀況量表中的活力狀況、整體健康狀況、心理健康、因身體健康所引起的角色限制四個項目及學院別、個人病史、家族病史及宗教信仰等八個變項,可解釋健康促進生活型態總分所有變異量的29.9%。 結論:健康促進生活型態中營養、健康責任及運動,這三項行為執行最不理想,值得學校衛生單位注意及加強。影響健康促進生活型態的執行度,依序為活力狀況、整體健康狀況與心理健康。
Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to explore the health promoting lifestyles and the related variables among university students. Methods: A structural questionnaire was used for data collection which containing demography sheet, the scale of health promoting lifestyles (HPLPΠ), and the SF36 of self-perceived health status. Results: The score of health promoting lifestyles is general low, range from 52 to 208, among the sub-scales the lowest is ‘exercise’, followed by ‘health responsibility’, ‘nutrition’, ‘stress management’, ‘self-actualization’, and the highest is ‘interpersonal support’. Within the ‘exercise’, female students received an even lower score than male, and in the ‘interpersonal support’, male students received a lower score than females. The findings also indicated that these students who study in health related major received a better score than others in ‘health responsibility’, ‘stress management’, ‘interpersonal support’, ‘nutrition’ and ‘exercise’. According to the stepwise multiple regression analysis, the Vitality, General Health, Mental Health, Role Physical, studying major, Personal history of disease, Family history of disease, and Religion were the significant predictors to students’ health promotion lifestyle with 29.9% variability to HPLP Π. Conclusions: According to the finding of this study, it is clear that the students’ health promotion lifestyle needs more attention, especially with exercise, health responsibility and nutrition.