透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.206.73
  • 學位論文

文化創意產業之著作權研究-以公共文化財產之改作為中心

A Study on Copyright Infringement of Cultural and Creative Industries - Focus on Re-create Public Domain

指導教授 : 顏名宏 吳尚儒
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


文化創意產業為國家重點發展產業,文化改作相關議題由於牽涉創作者與著作權以及國家利益頗鉅,因此相關討論一直不斷。由於文化創意產業兼具文化、法律及創作者,以公共文化財產為改作之行為將會對著作權法律體系有所衝突。再者如「思想與表達二分」的爭議及「禁止不當變更權」之限制以及合理使用與製版權的問題等等都是文化創意產業與著作權法相關的問題。針對上述問題,本研究將以下方式整理歸納: 1. 理解詮釋學的意義,運用創作與法律兩門人文科學可以共通的語言,作為討論的基礎。 2. 文化產業與產業文化的區分與概述,簡述文化創意產業之結構。 3. 改作涉及文化創意產業之情形與探討,以了解文化創意產業所面臨的問題。 4. 探討文化創意產業所牽涉到的著作權法的財產權問題,運用個案分析,瞭解創作的觀點,再以詮釋學對創作及著作權之間的問題作探討,接近問題之核心。 另根據研究的發現與結論,提出對於國內著作權法之相關單位及後續研究者之建議。

並列摘要


Cultural and creative industries is the key development industry in Taiwan. The issue about Cultural re-creation is a huge problem of cultural creators and copyright. The problem is affect the national interests, and therefore related discussions have been constantly. As cultural and creative Include “Cultural”, “Law” and “Creators”. Using public domain to re-create will Infringe the copyright law. Furthermore, such as the issue on “Idea Expression Dichotomy” and the restriction on “Right of Integrity”, also the fair use on right of copy in public domain. Those problem are the copyright law issue on cultural and creative industries. To solve these problem, This study summarizes the theory as follows: 1. Understanding the significance of hermeneutics. And using hermeneutics as a basis for discussion between creativity and law. 2. Overview cultural Industries and the distinction with industry culture, outlined the structure of cultural and creative industries. 3. Discussing about re-create involve cultural and creative industries, in order to understand the problems faced. 4. Investigating the implications of cultural and creative industries to the property rights of copyright law, using case study to understand the view of creation. And then using hermeneutics as Investigation on issues between the creative work and copyright, in order to close to the core of the problem. Finally, according to the findings and conclusions of the study, make the recommendations to the relevant units of the domestic copyright law and future research suggestions.

參考文獻


18. Richard E. Palmer(帕瑪)(1992)。詮釋學。(嚴平,譯者)。台北:桂冠。
45. 馮震宇(2007)。國際智慧財產權公約及國際發展趨勢。台北:經濟部智慧財產局。
47. 楊海平(2007)。著作權法制與實務論文集︰衍伸著作之保護。台北:經濟部智慧財產局。
56. 賴文智(2007)。著作權一點通。台北:經濟部智慧財產局。
59. 謝銘洋(2001)。著作權案例彙編(五)-美術著作篇。台北:經濟部智慧財產局。

延伸閱讀