透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.19.29.89
  • 期刊

再探公民:反思高中《公民與社會》新課綱之訂定

Civic Education Revisited: Reflecting on the Making of New Course Outline for High School "Civics and Society"

摘要


本文強調高中《公民與社會》學科從(95)暫綱到(99)新課綱,均以養成未來公民資質為課程目標,並未嘗用社會科學概論來全盤取代公民教育。但同時認為,新的公民養成必須通過相關的社會科學知識的學習進行,而不是回到傳統文化與德育品格教育途徑。作者採取「參與客觀化」的立場,客觀化自身參與經驗,並「返身」檢視擔任「課綱小組」召集人任內的經歷與問題。本文視「課綱」為非獨立、非中立文本,為具有強制性與排他性之教育規範,其制訂乃「鑲嵌」在複雜的社會關係(包括權力、利益、甚至某些特殊關係)之中。本文陳述課綱之訂定,乃是一連串的社會與政治行動結果,受到政府本位主義、社會壓力團體、遊說、以及其他利益的介入等。本文同時陳述「課綱小組」的組成以及運作,並舉重大爭議為例加以說明。最後,本文列舉此次《公民與社會》課綱所呈現的部分特色,特別是對於人權教育的看重。

並列摘要


The article emphasizes that the goal of the ”Civics and Society” course at high school level, evolving from the (95) C.O. (Curriculum Outline) to the new (99) C.O., has been to cultivate future citizenship. It has not attempted to replace citizenship teaching completely with social science topics. And at the same time, the new C.O. made it clear that citizenship education will go through the learning of selected and relevant social science topics, not going back to traditionalistic culture or moral teaching. The author adopts a ”participant objectivation” approach and to objectify his own experiences, reflecting on his work and issues he faced while serving as the convener of the curriculum committee. This article does not view C.O. as pure neutral texts independent of power and interests. In fact, C.O. is treated as an official document that is endowed with normative, coercive and exclusive privileges in high school education. And the drafting of C.O. is embedded in complicated social relations. The article describes that the contents of C.O. is accomplished through a series of social and political actions. The process is also affected by government, intra-government, particularistic interests and lobbying pressures from social groups. The article describes the composition and operation of the curriculum committee with illustrations of serious intra-committee debates. In the end, the article highlights some of the new elements and features of the new C.O., especially on its implications for human rights education.

被引用紀錄


白雅慧(2020)。高中公民與社會指考試題特性與教科書關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST202000166
江志勇(2015)。體驗學習取向法治教育課程實踐之行動研究—以國中生法院參訪及模擬法庭為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204705
李江(2021)。教師對十二年國教高中公民與社會科之課程認知與實施態度〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101644
邱裕勝(2021)。十二年國民基本教育社會領域課程綱要研修歷程之民主意涵檢視分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100807
林東霆(2020)。從高中服儀抗爭運動(2010-2016)抗爭者看法治教育對學生法治意識影響之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000257

延伸閱讀