BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction is one of the indicators for quality of healthcare, it provides important reference in a continuous quality improvement (CQI) program. The aims of this study were to report patients’ documented evaluation of the endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) they received, to investigate the factors that may confound the level of their satisfaction, and to explore the feasibility of using these data in a CQI for ESS. METHOD: Eighty-three patients with chronic sinusitis underwent ESS enrolled into this study. Patients completed a validated Patient Satisfaction Survey at 1 Month after surgery. Patients’ demographic data and process elements were obtained from the medical records retrospectively. Multi-level ordinal logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine what process variables and patient characteristics were associated with the level of patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Overall, 72% of patients were more than satisfied with the service. Both education level and disease severity were significantly related to the satisfaction level (p<0.01). Type of anesthesia, additional septal operation, type of intranasal packing and the frequency of post-operative sinuscopy were also closely related to patients’ satisfaction with ESS. CONCLUSION: The study provided pilot patient satisfaction information on ESS for both physicians and patients. With proper adjustment, the satisfaction data proved to be useful in a CQI program for ESS.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction is one of the indicators for quality of healthcare, it provides important reference in a continuous quality improvement (CQI) program. The aims of this study were to report patients’ documented evaluation of the endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) they received, to investigate the factors that may confound the level of their satisfaction, and to explore the feasibility of using these data in a CQI for ESS. METHOD: Eighty-three patients with chronic sinusitis underwent ESS enrolled into this study. Patients completed a validated Patient Satisfaction Survey at 1 Month after surgery. Patients’ demographic data and process elements were obtained from the medical records retrospectively. Multi-level ordinal logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine what process variables and patient characteristics were associated with the level of patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Overall, 72% of patients were more than satisfied with the service. Both education level and disease severity were significantly related to the satisfaction level (p<0.01). Type of anesthesia, additional septal operation, type of intranasal packing and the frequency of post-operative sinuscopy were also closely related to patients’ satisfaction with ESS. CONCLUSION: The study provided pilot patient satisfaction information on ESS for both physicians and patients. With proper adjustment, the satisfaction data proved to be useful in a CQI program for ESS.