透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.134.77.195
  • 期刊

王夫之《詩經》學新探

A New Study of Wang Fuzhi's Learning of Shijing

摘要


王夫之的《詩經》學著作有:《詩經稗疏》四卷、《詩經攷異》一卷、〈韻辨〉與《詩廣傳》五卷,透過本文的研究,發現了一個事實,王夫之治《詩經》學,其間展現的研究方法與進路並非調合,而是趨向兩個端點。質實言之,《詩經稗疏》、《詩經攷異》、〈叶韻辨〉所表現的是純然的漢學研究方法,但是《詩廣傳》卻凸顯出了宋學派所喜的「義理之新」。於是我們在此推定:王夫之《詩經》學所採用的研究方式為「漢宋並治」!王夫之本身或許是漢學、宋學兼採,兩種能力兼備,但是其《詩經》學著作所表現出的治學方式卻是往兩種進路各自發展。所謂的「漢宋並治」並非調合,而是分別並存;「漢宋並治」也非對立,而是互不相涉。我們可以由「漢宋並治」的觀點解釋王夫之在清朝的影響層面與地位升降,希望能為經學史的研究提供一個新的思考向度。

並列摘要


Wang Fuzhi's study of Shiji includes four works, the Shijingbeishu (4 juans), the Shijingkaoyi (1 juan), the Xieyunbian, and the Shiguangzhuan (5 juans). Through a new study of Wang Fuzhi's learning of Shying, this article discovers the fact that Wang's learning of Shying reveals not a syncretism but rather a trend of bifurcation in the methods used in Wang's work. That is to say the works of Shijingbeishu, Shijingkaoyi and Xieyunbian reveal an employment of pure Sinological research method and approach. However, Wang's Shiguangzhuan reveals the ”philosophical new approach” which the school of Song Learning prefers. Therefore, we can infer that Wang Fuzhi's study of Shying employs two different research methods. This is an approach of double employment of both the sinological method and the philosophical method. Wang Fuzhi employed both the sinological and the philosophical methods in his study and had these two different kinds of abilities. However, his works on Shying reveals separate employment of these two methods. Therefore the above-mentioned method of double employment is not a syncretism of the two methods but rather a kind of separate employment in different works. Double employment of these two methods does not result in conflict as these methods simply have no mutual connection in Wang's employment in his study of Shying. From such a perspective of double employment, we can explain Wang's influence and the rise and fall of his status in the Qing dynasty. We hope to provide a new dimension in the study of the history of the learning of Confucian classics.

參考文獻


船山全書編輯委員會編校(1996)。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。
船山全書編輯委員會編校(1996)。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。
朱熹(1974)。詩集傳。台北:藝文印書館。
船山全書編輯委員會編校(1996)。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。
船山全書編輯委員會編校(1996)。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。

被引用紀錄


彭莉婷(2015)。宋代經筵講義探析 ──以廖剛《詩經講義》與袁燮《絜齋毛詩經筵講義》為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00667
李佳明(2008)。梁益《詩傳旁通》研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2008.00594
江昭蓉(2008)。顧棟高《詩經》著述研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2008.00358
郭芳如(2013)。從鬼神觀論朱熹哲學及其宗教向度〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.02581
郭怡君(2015)。當代《詩經》數位化研究〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M9843705

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量