透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.14.6.194
  • 期刊

身心障礙資優生優弱勢分析結果之探究

A Research through Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis Results of Gifted Students with Disabilities

摘要


本研究對象爲國小一至六年級亞斯伯格症資優生、高功能自閉症資優生、注意力缺陷過動症資優生與學習障礙資優生,共計九名。採多元評量與多資料來源進行優弱勢分析,包括標準化測驗量表檢核、半結構式訪談和文件分析等策略,藉以了解身心障礙資優生優勢潛能與弱勢困難,做爲未來介入服務之依據。綜合本研究主要發現如下:一、本研究個案在魏氏兒童智力量表(第四版)之全量表或組合量表智商至少爲120。全量表智商以亞斯伯格症資優生最高,學障資優生最低;處理速度共同偏低。二、本研究個案在陶倫斯創造思考測驗全量表得分皆偏低,分測驗以精密力表現較佳。三、本研究個案在學生自評之多元智能量表表現歧異,有高估或低估現象。四、本研究個案在家長評定之行爲與情緒量表顯見人際關係分量表爲共同弱勢。五、本研究個案在校多數科目表現優等;家長對個案的弱勢覺知較優勢明確。六、本研究從語文理解、知覺推理、創造思考、多元智能、情緒管理、人際互動與學習動機七個向度綜合評析個案優弱勢。本研究個案共同優勢爲詞彙與常識豐富、喜好閱讀、記憶力佳、圖形設計與推理良好;共同弱勢爲處理速度慢、書寫不佳、創意技巧不足、遇困難易放棄、不善人際互動與情緒管理待加強。

並列摘要


This research was to investigate and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of gifted students with disabilities. There were nine subjects from 1st to 6th grade elementary school students, including gifted students with AS, HFA, ADHD, and LD. Data collected through standardized tests, questionnaire, check with non-standardized interview, and document analysis of multiple strategies in order to understand the strengths of gifted students with disabilities and disadvantaged potential difficulties. The main findings were outlined below:1. This research applied the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.) to all subjects, and all students scored low on Processing Speed Index as a result.2. All students' Torrance Creativity Test full scores were low.3. There were over or underestimate the abilities according to the self-assessment of multiple intelligence scale performance differences.4. The results of all students’ Behavior and Emotional Assessment by parents, were different, but the interpersonal subscales were common weak.5. Parents were more aware of the weakness than the strength of all students' academic subjects in school performance superior.6. This research consolidated material of seven aspects from various sources and multiple scale assessments covering. By using this information, the researcher were able to effectively analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the subjects. The different types of gifted students with disabilities advantage of strengths and weaknesses have similarities and differences. The strengths were rich of vocabulary and common sense, love to read, good memory, graphic design, and reasoning. The weaknesses were processing speed, poor writing, lacking of creative skills, easy to give up, and poor social interaction and emotional management.

參考文獻


吳昆壽(1999)。資優殘障學生教育現況與問題調查研究。特殊教育與復健學報。7,1-32。
吳昆壽(2001)。資優障礙學生家庭生態系統研究。資優教育研究。1(1),85-110。
吳武典(1986)。重視資優的殘障者之教育。特殊教育季刊。21,1。
吳武典、張正芬、盧台華、邱紹春(2004)。文蘭適應行為量表指導手冊。臺北市:心理。
吳武典(2007)。多元智能量表乙式指導手冊。臺北市:心理。

被引用紀錄


邱羽逢、邱昱東(2023)。身心障礙資優大學生與身心障礙同儕關係之探討學生事務與輔導62(1),35-50。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.202306_62(1).0005
陳宥妤(2021)。雙重特殊需求學生個案研究-以國小聽覺障礙資優生為例資優教育季刊(155),13-23。https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.202104_(155).13-24
陳勇祥(2018)。輕度自閉症資優學生失敗經驗的情感調節及復原歷程之研究特殊教育研究學刊43(3),29-55。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201811_43(3).0002
梁斐瑜(2016)。一位星星王子的音樂特殊才能發展歷程:同儕師徒學習模式特殊教育研究學刊41(2),89-115。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201607.4102004
鄒小蘭、盧台華(2015)。身心障礙資優學生支援服務系統建構之行動研究特殊教育研究學刊40(2),1-29。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201507.4002001

延伸閱讀