質性評價高中資優生數學解題思路之探討──以SOLO與修訂版Bloom分類法為工具

本研究目的在於以可觀察學習成果結構（Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome, SOLO）分類法與修訂版Bloom分類法為評價工具，分析高中數學資優生之解題表現，探討其解題思路的結構層次與樣貌。本研究採用個案研究法與顯性特徵分析法之研究設計，立意選取六位高中數學資優學生，收集六位個案學生在數學競賽培訓課程的解題實作測驗資料，參照兩種分類法之理論架構，分別整合成用以分析學生解題表現的評價規準，探討其解題思路在兩種分類法的結構層次及其發展途徑之樣貌。研究結果有：（1）六位個案學生之整體數學解題表現的評價結果，在SOLO方面，均已達到擴展抽象結構層次；在Bloom修訂版方面，其知識向度均已達到後設認知層次，而認知歷程向度亦皆達到創造層次。（2）六位個案學生之數學解題表現，都出現個數不一之U-M-R迴圈或路徑的解題思路；同時，研究發現六位個案學生的解題表現在SOLO之結構層次愈高，其所展現的Bloom之知識與認知歷程層次也愈好。在學生評量應用的蘊涵上，其意義揭示透過SOLO與修訂版Bloom分類法之質性評價，可以讓高中數學資優生的數學解題思路變得更加可觀察。

關鍵字

可觀察之學習成果結構；數學解題表現；數學解題思路

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to use the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy and the revised Bloom taxonomy as evaluation tools to analyze the problem-solving performance of high school gifted students in the mathematical contest tests and to explore the structural levels of their problem-solving strategies and mental paths. The research design adopted the case study and explicit feature analysis method, by deliberately selecting six high school mathematics gifted students with collecting their problem-solving manuscripts of six contest tests in the mathematics competition training course. The study refered to the theoretical framework of the two taxonomies to respectively integrate into evaluation criteria for analyzing the problem-solving performance of the six students and explored the manifestations of the structural levels and the developmental paths. The research results showed that: (1) The overall evaluation of these six case students' mathematics problem-solving performances had reached the "extended abstract structure level" in terms of SOLO; in the revised version of Bloom, their knowledge dimensions have reached the "metacognitive knowledge" level, and their cognitive process dimensions have also reached the "create" level. (2) There were several U-M-R loops appearing in the six case students' mathematics problem-solving mental paths. Meanwhile, it also showed that the higher the structure level of SOLO taxonomy, the better the level of the knowledge and cognitive process dimension of the revised version of Bloom in the case students' problem-solving performances.

並列關鍵字

structure of the observed learning outcome ； mathematical problem-solving performance ； mathematical problem-solving mental path

參考文獻

江奇婉、劉祥通(2010)。以追趕問題為例探討資優個案的解題表現。資優教育季刊，116，18－24。〔Chiang, Chi-Wan, & Liu, Shiang-Tung (2010). Analysis of problem solving performance for a gifted case: Examples from the type of running and cathcing up of speed problems. Gifted Education Quarterly, 116,18-24. 〕 http://dx.doi.org/10.6218%2fGEQ.201009_(116).0004

張景媛(1994)。數學文字題概念分析及學生建構數學概念的研究。教育心理學報，27，175－200。〔Chang, Ching-Yuan(1994). The analysis of misconceptions of mathematics word-problem and the way of students’ constructing mathematics concept. Bulletin of Educatinal Psychology, 27, 175-200.〕 https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.19940601.7

劉致演、秦爾聰(2018)。探討兩位國中教師發展數學臆測探究教學實務。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，11(1)，57－ 89 。〔 Liu, Chih-Yen, & Chin, Erh-Tsung (2018). An investigation into two junior high school teachers’ teaching practice in developing mathematics conjecturing-inquiry teaching. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 11(1), 57-89. 〕https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492018041101003

劉哲源、劉祥通(2008)。國一資優生對因倍數問題的解題分析。資優教育研究，8(1)，47－66。〔Liu, Che-Yuan, &Liu,Shiang-Tung (2008). Analyses of problem solving performance of factor and multiple problems of gifted seventh grade students. Journal of Gifted Education, 8(1), 47-66.〕 http://dx.doi.org/10.7089%2fJGE.200806.0047

蔡子雲、劉祥通(2007)。資優生在想什麽？──速率篇。資優教育研究，7(1)，29 － 47 。〔 Cai, Zih-Yun, & Liu,Shiang-Tung (2007). How are gifted students think about “Speed”. Journal of Gifted Education, 7(1), 29-47. 〕https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200706.0029

主題瀏覽