透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.137.181.66
  • 期刊

論兩岸文字標準化之“字體”與“筆順”評析-由古文字觀點來探討

Typeface and Stroke Order Narration the Two Sides across the Taiwan Strait Writing standardization-Discusses by the Ancient Writing Viewpoint

摘要


海峽兩岸雖然政權分立,但對於標準字與標準筆順的研訂,皆著力甚深,分別頒定了標準字與標準筆順以施於民。去除簡體字與繁體字差異,卻發現兩岸存在著同字異形與同字筆順有別的兩大矛盾,孰是孰非,實應有一判斷的準則。而文字是一脈相承,經歷長時間歷史演化的產物,它有著承襲與改變之處,因此古文字形當可作爲判斷兩岸標準字是非的依據。在訂定標準字的同時,若能兼顧古今字形的演變,必可使得古今文字之間的聯係更爲緊密,以稍紓許慎「古文由此絕矣」之憾。

關鍵字

海峽兩岸 漢字 國字 標準字 通用字 筆順 古文字

並列摘要


Although two sides across the Taiwan Strait political power separation, but grinds regarding standard character and the standard stroke order subscribes, all tries really deeply, proclaimed separately has decided the standard character and the standard stroke order executes in the people. Elimination simplified character and traditional character difference, actually the discovery two sides across the Taiwan Strait exist with the character abnormity with two big contradictions which is able to discriminate with the character stroke order, which is right and which is wrong?solid should have a judgment criterion. However the writing is inherits, experiences the product which the long time history evolves, it has carries on place of with the change, therefore when the classical Chinese literature glyph may take the judgment two sides across the Taiwan Strait standard character right and wrong the basis. While schedules the standard character, if can give dual attention to the ancient and modern glyph the evolution, must be possible to cause between the ancient and modern writing the relation to be closer, by relieves Xu Shen slightly: ”the classical Chinese literature to terminate from this” the regret.

參考文獻


漢許慎撰、清段玉裁注(1998)。新添古音說文解字注。臺北:洪葉文化事業有限公司。
王開揚著(2004)。漢字現代化研究。濟南:齊魯書社出版社。
高明(1980)。古文字類編。北京:中華書局。
教育部國語推行委員會編輯(1996)。常用國字標準字體筆順手冊。臺北:教育部。
傅永和著(2000)。字形的規範。北京:語文出版社。

延伸閱讀