家庭暴力案件危險分級管理試辦方案及其成效之介紹

The Introduction for Experimental Project of the Risk Stratification of Domestic Violence Cases and Its Effectiveness in Taiwan

林明傑(Min-Chieh Lin) ； 鄭瑞隆(Jui-Lung Cheng) ； 蔡宗晃(Tsung-Huang Tsai) ； 張秀鴛(Xiu-Yuan Chang) ； 李文輝(Wen-Hui Lee)

《亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊》 1卷1期 (2005/12) Pp. 215-244

https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO.200512.0008

摘要

我國家庭暴力防治法自1998年通過至今，實務上發現法官甚少裁定轉介審前鑑定而致使加害人甚少有危險評估及接受處遇計畫，使家暴法未能落實加害人之輔導治療，而被害人也未能有依據危險評估之嚴密安全計畫。本試辦方案就目前家暴法從報案、施測致命危險量表(DA)及受暴嚴重度量表(CTS)、改新式簡易鑑定、法官依據簡易鑑定之危險分級裁定保護令之輔導治療、警察及社工員依據危險分級作危險管理、及後續之保護令輔導治療人員之訓練與實施等提出一完整之改善建議，並於2005年在嘉義縣市、基隆市、及宜蘭縣試辦之。
實施後發現本方案有以下之優點：能促進各體系之溝通、大幅提高法官之裁定加害人處遇計畫並加速保護令之核發、及警察對於家暴案件之兩造查訪有清楚之方向及做法、社工員對於中高之危險分級之被害人會給予較多之關懷與查訪、及參與輔導之加害人亦較能有機會在輔導治療中學習再犯預防及自我控制之觀念。而本方案也發現確實有聲請保護令之異常個案，如有濫用（如被害者有惡意）或誤用（被害者有精神異常等）保護令之虞者，其約各佔4.8%及1.1%。

並列摘要

Taiwan passed Domestic Violence Prevention Law in 1998. However, it was found that the judges rarely transferred the abusers for pre-sentence assessment, and it caused that rare abuser sentenced to clinical treatment in protection order, which jeopardized the original purpose of this law to prevent re-abuse in the future. This experimental project tried to re-organize the whole procedure. It included the following elements: police officer assisted the victim to fill risk assessment scale while report the case, new telephone-contact brief assessment by clinician, clinicians wrote the report and treatment suggestion for judge, the judge sentenced the treatment by referring the brief assessment report, supervising contacts of various density made by the police officer and social workers, supervisor trained enough treatment practitioners for providing treatment, and network meeting opened every two months.
The advantages of this project were found as the following: better communication among related workers, more abusers sentenced to treatment by judges, more supervising contacts were made by police officers and social workers, more abusers participated treatment to learn relapse prevention and self control. The project also found abnormal domestic abuse reporting cases, such as 4.8% of victims maliciously abused this law and 1.1% of victims had serious mental illness to make the faulty report.