透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.236.174
  • 期刊

從哲學範疇詮釋中國哲學的方法論思維及其系統架構的局限

The Interpretation of the Chinese Philosophy's Methodology Thinking and Its Limits of System Framework from Philosophy Category

摘要


本論文從哲學範疇與研究方法論的聯結關係與論證價值為研究起點,進而試圖分析中國哲學範疇的分類與單一性、相對性、系統性範疇體系的架構,並由此進路探討從範疇詮釋中國哲學的方法論思維的系統。其中,從單一性範疇詮釋中國哲學的價值根源,從相對性範疇詮釋中國哲學的理論架構,從系統性範疇詮釋中國哲學的實踐應用。最後,論證以範疇為研究中心的方法論系統架構可能的優勢與局限。 因此,透過本文的研究,希望能夠從範疇中思考中國哲學詮釋方法論建構的可能性,以及從範疇的研究與詮釋分類中,分析各種範疇在詮釋系統中其架構的局限,進而彰顯中國哲學的特質及其殊勝的思想價值。

並列摘要


This article begins from the correlation and argument merit between philosophy category and research methodology, then, tries to analyze the classification and the wholly, relative and systematize philosophy category of Chinese philosophy. By this approach, it explores the system of Chinese philosophy's methodological thinking by category interpretation, including explaining the Chinese philosophy's root of value by wholly category interpretation, explaining the Chinese philosophy's theoretical framework by relative category interpretation, and explaining the Chinese philosophy's practice and application by systematize category interpretation. Finally, it demonstrates the superiority and limitation of category-centrism methodological system framework. Therefore, through this research, it not only rethinks the possibility of constructing the interpretative methodology of Chinese philosophy by category, but also analyzes the categories' limitation of framework in interpretive system. At last, it reveals the characteristics and excellent thinking merits of Chinese philosophy.

參考文獻


嚴復譯、王中江著(1997)。嚴復。台北:東大圖書公司。
(2002)。禪宗公案體相用思想之研究。台北:學生書局。
亞里士多德。範疇篇
郎昆如著(1996)。西洋哲學史。台北:正中書局。
亞里斯士德原著、余紀元譯(2003)。工具論。北京:中國人民出版社。

被引用紀錄


金玟(2010)。程頤的形上學與工夫論〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.00750

延伸閱讀