工程與法律教學研究之科際整合：以臺大小巨蛋判決為例

Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching on Engineering and Law

林明鏘(Ming-Chiang Lin)

《臺大法學論叢》 38卷3期 (2009/09) Pp. 109-171

https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2009.38.03.03

摘要

工程與法律隨著工程紛爭之增加，彼此問有極大的機會互相對話與溝通，因此，不論對於法學教育，或是對於司法實務判決，此種不斷整合與對話，變成迫切而且有其重要性，而目前國內法學文獻均在法律紛爭的架構觀點下去整合工程實務與法學理論。
本論文亦以法律規範架構之分析為出發點，即以國內法與國際法之種種規範分析歸類紛爭之類型，論辯紛爭所衍生之法律關係及法律爭訟程序，最後則以臺大小巨蛋之工程紛爭判決為例，反覆印證，工程紛爭中，法律人與工程師之重大歧見，並進一步去探究其彼此見解分歧之主要原因，並提出本論文之建議，希望工程與法律之科際整合，能夠真正有效實踐，而非各說各話式的各自表述而已。

關鍵字

科技整合 ； 工程與法律 ； 臺大小巨蛋判決 ； 契約要項 ； 顯失公平 ； 擬制變更 ； 誠信原則 ； 兩階段法律關係

並列摘要

As disputes in Engineering and Law are growing, the two fields have immense opportunity to mutually integrate and dialogue with each other. Therefore, no matter to legal education or judicial decisions, this kind of ongoing integration and dialogue becomes critical and important. Currently, Taiwan's academia integrates engineering practices and legal theories from the framework and perspective of legal disputes.
This article begins with analysis of legal framework, including categorizing disputes from various regulations among our law and international law, legal relation and litigation process of the disputes. Our conclusion ends with the analysis of a construction dispute on National Taiwan University’s Sports Center. Careful argument renders the main reason why legal profession and engineers differs on some major controversies. With the hope that Engineering and Law can effectively integrate with each other, the author propose his suggestion that the two should not interpret disputes by their own definition or from their unidirectional point of view.

並列關鍵字

interdisciplinary integration ； engineering and law ； decision of National Taiwan University's Sports Center ； contract purview ； obviously unfair ； constructive alteration ； principle of good faith ； two-stage leg

參考文獻

孔繁琦(2007)。論工程契約對於不可抗力致工程本體毀損滅失之風險分配原則。律師雜誌。330，9-21。

王文宇、謝定亞主持人()。

王伯儉(2004)。工程糾紛與索賠實務。台北:元照。

王雪娟、古嘉諄編、陳希佳編、陳秋華編(2007)。工程法律實務研析（三）。台北:元照。

古嘉諄編、陳希佳編、顏玉明編(2006)。工程法律實務研析（二）。台北:元照。