債權人代位行使債務人請求權所生實體法效果歸屬

在台灣，多數學說與實務見解認為債權人行使代位權的法律效果應歸屬於「債務人」，多數學者並認為債權人代位受領標的物後，代位權人不得以「其對被代位人的債權」與「被代位人對其請求返還的債權」主張抵銷，少數學者則認為代位權人得主張抵銷；在大陸，司法解釋認為由「債權人」直接受償；在日本，學說上一般認為債權人行使代位權的法律效果應歸屬於「債務人」，但債權人得否主張抵銷，學說實務見解不一。本文則認為債權人行使代位權的法律效果應歸屬於「債務人」，債權人亦不得主張抵銷。

關鍵字

代位；代位權；債權人代位權；代位受領；優先權；優先受償；抵銷

並列摘要

Most Taiwanese scholars and courts consider that the legal effect of the creditor's subrogation right shall belong to the obligor. In addition, a majority of Taiwanese scholars consider that after the creditor exercises his subrogation right and receives the third obligor's presentations, the creditor shall not claim for offset. On the other hand, a minority of Taiwanese scholars consider that the creditor may claim for offset. The judicial interpretation in Mainland China considers that the legal effect of the creditor's subrogation right belongs to the creditor. Most Japanese scholars consider that the legal effect of the creditor's subrogation right shall belong to the obligor. But the views of the scholars and courts that whether the creditor may claim for offset or not are different. This thesis considers that the legal effect of the creditor's subrogation right shall belong to the obligor and the creditor shall not claim for offset.

並列關鍵字

subrogation ； subrogation right ； creditor's subrogation right obligee's subrogation right ； exercise the subrogation right and receive the presentation ； preferential right of payment ； lien ； offset setoff