優秀選手進入國訓中心前之訓練場所滿意度分析

Satisfaction analysis of training places for excellent players before entering the national training center

吳冠霖 ； 陳金海 ； 廖敏竣

《長榮運動休閒學刊》 14期 (2020/06) Pp. 9-17

摘要

本研究目的在調查分析我國優秀選手進入國訓中心前之訓練場所滿意度情形。本研究採用問卷調查法，以國家運動訓練中心優秀選手為研究對象，研究工具為參與訓練滿意度問卷，內容包含：基本資料、滿意度量表。所得各項資料以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、雪費爾事後比較等統計方法進行分析。結果發現：一、我國優秀選手進入國訓中心前之訓練場所滿意度以教練領導最高，訓練方式最低；個別題項最高前3名為：教練人格品行、教練訓練方式、每天訓練時間，最後3名為：器材品質、比賽成績、技術表現。二、我國優秀選手進入國訓中心前之訓練場所滿意度差異比較：不同項目在訓練方式、訓練表現、教練領導等構面達到顯著差異（各組別沒有特別差異）；不同公私立在訓練表現構面達到顯著差異（私立顯著高於公立）；不同性別在訓練方式、訓練表現、教練領導等構面都無顯著差異。

關鍵字

教練 ； 訓練 ； 器材品質

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate and analyze the satisfaction of our excellent players before they entered the training center. The research adopt the survey techniques, taking the excellent players of national sports training center as the research object, and the research tool is the questionnaire of training satisfaction. Content include: basic data, satisfaction questionnaire. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t test, one-way ANOVA, Scheff's method. The results show that: 1. Before entering the national training center, the training places of our excellent players have the highest satisfaction with the coaches' leadership and the lowest satisfaction with the training methods; The results show that: 1. Before entering the national training center, the training places of our excellent players have the highest satisfaction with the coaches' leadership and the lowest satisfaction with the training methods. For individual items, the top 3 items are: coach's personality, coach's training method, and daily training time, and the last 3 items are: equipment quality, competition results, and technical performance. 2. Comparison of the differences in satisfaction of the training places of our excellence players before they entered the national training center: there were significant differences in training methods, training performance, coach leadership and other aspects among different items (no special differences among different groups); There were significant differences in training performance between public and private (private was significantly higher than public) . There was no significant difference in training style, training performance, coaching and leadership between different genders.

並列關鍵字

coach ； training ； equipment quality

參考文獻

吳孟峰（2006）。臺北市國小桌球校隊訓練滿意度之研究。未出版碩士論文，臺北市立體育學院，臺北市。

李建平（2002）。大專網球優秀選手對教練領導行為與訓練滿意度之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

邱政鋒（2011）。曲棍球選手運動內在動機與訓練滿意度之相關研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，10（1），68-76。

張滄彬（2003）。桃園地區國中田徑代表隊教練領導行為與選手滿意度之調查研究。未出版碩士論文，臺北市立體育學院，臺北市。

許宜佳（2002）。國家運動選手訓練中心選手訓練滿意度之研究。未出版碩士論文，臺灣體育學院，臺中市。