參考文獻
Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U. S. 63, 67(1972); Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 309(1980); Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 185(1981).
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S.＿, 132 S.Ct. 1289, 1291-1292(2012).
Meyer, Stuart,Patel, Rajiv(2011).Eighteen Months Later: How Bilski Has Impacted Process Patents.PLI/Pat.1063(483),494.
Menell, Peter S.(2011).Forty Years of Wondering in the Wildness and No Closer to the Promised Land: Bilski' s Superficial Textualism and the Missed Opportunity to Return Patent Law to Its Technology Mooring.Stan. L. Rev..63(1289),1304-1307.
李森堙(2012)。Bilski 案判決後的美國方法發明專利標的適格性認定。科技法律透析。24(2)，2-7。
被引用紀錄
陳宗賢（2016）。以專利制度保護生物製藥之研究〔碩士論文，國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614052132