參考文獻
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE [GPO], LEAHY-SMITH AMERICA INVENTS ACT(2011), http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-112publ29/pdf/PLAW-112publ29.pdf (last visited Oct. 16, 2013).
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE [USPTO], USPTO White Paper - Automated Business Methods - Section III Class 705, http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/methods/afmdpm/class705.jsp(last visited Oct. 16, 2013).
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-129, § 18, 125 Stat. 284, 329-331(2012).
Patent Quality Improvement Act of 2013, S. 866, 113th Cong. § 2 (2013), http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th/senate-bill/866(last visited Oct. 17, 2013).
Jennifer Martinez and Brendan Sasso, Google, Facebook, Wal-Mart, Macy`s call on Congress to Combat patent trolls, The Hill Technology Blog (July 30, 2013, 08:33 p.m.), http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/314565-facebook-google-wal-mart-macys-call-on-congress-to-combat-patent-trolls (last visited Oct. 16, 2013).
延伸閱讀
- 吳仁傑（2020）。美國專利複審程序之研究-以多方複審程序為中心〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202002317
- 何祥任（2020）。美國專利侵權訴訟中專利無效程序與多方複審制度之比較研究〔碩士論文，國立政治大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202001416
- Yang, Y. H. (2017). 美國專利多方複審程序立案決定之預測 [master's thesis, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201702913
- 連雅玲（2002）。有關美國專利再審查程序之新法案。理律法律雜誌（中文），2002(1)，21-22。https://doi.org/10.29491/LLB.200201.0021
- 李素華（2020）。從美國立法例檢討我國之專利爭訟制度：以侵權訴訟、舉發撤銷與更正之交錯為中心。臺大法學論叢，49(2)，477-558。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.202006_49(2).0002