論被告迅速審判的權利－刑事妥速審判法重點評釋

Right to Speedy Trial of the accused-The Main Interpretation on Proper and Speedy Trial of Criminal Justice Act

邱嘉祥(Chiu-Chia Hsiang)

《國防管理學術暨實務研討會》 第十八屆 (2010/06) Pp. 755-779

https://doi.org/10.29497/GFGL.201006.0755

摘要

台灣司法制度弊病橫生，審判遲延及積案問題亟待解決。司法院為解決這項難題，首先於98年8月6日以迅雷不急掩耳的速度對外公布「刑事妥速審判法草案」，同年10月15日召開第133次院會，通過微調版的草案，並函送立法院審議，並於99年4月23日三讀通過，立法之迅速，令人愕然。看似乎在台灣司法史出現一道曙光，積案問題終可獲得解決，然審究其條文內容，多為行政命令及訓示規定，涉及法律效果條文僅是少數，且礙難適用。本文就迅速審判為出發點，以美國相關立法例為借鏡，就我國「刑事妥速審判法」作評釋，最後提出幾點建議作為參考。

關鍵字

妥速審判 ； 迅速審判 ； 速審權 ； 重罪羈押 ； 無罪推定原則

並列摘要

Taiwan's judicial system defects dangers, trial delays and the backlog problem to be solved. Judicial Yuan to solve this problem, first in 98 years on August 6 Thunder no hurry to announce the speed of their ears, ”the draft of Proper and Speedy trial of Criminal Justice Act”, held on October 15 the same year the first 133 homes will be, by fine-tuning version the draft and sent it the Legislative Yuan, and in 99 years on April 23 the third reading. The legislative is so fast that make us very stunned. Taiwan's judicial history, appeared to occur in a dawn, the backlog problem finally be resolved, however the content of the trial study of its provisions, mostly for administrative orders and instructions provided, the legal effects of provisions related to only a few, and we find it difficult to apply. In this paper, a speedy trial as a starting point, the relevant legislation of the United States to draw on ”Proper and Speedy trial of Criminal Justice Act” as an interpretation , and finally some suggestions for reference.

並列關鍵字

Proper and Speedy trial ； speedy trial ； speedy trial rights ； felony detention ； presumption of innocence