本研究旨在探討針對高中生所發展之細懸浮微粒(PM_(2.5))防治動畫教育介入課程,對於高中生之PM_(2.5)防治知識、環境敏感度、PM_(2.5)防治態度、PM_(2.5)防治自我效能及PM_(2.5)防治行為意圖之影響,並瞭解該課程之介入成效。研究採準實驗設計,以臺北市某所國立高中之學生為研究對象,實驗組人數為106名,對照組人數為114名,共計220名學生,其中僅針對實驗組進行PM_(2.5)防治動畫教育介入。本研究之結果如下:一、介入前,研究對象之PM_(2.5)防治知識、環境敏感度、PM_(2.5)防治態度、PM_(2.5)防治自我效能與PM_(2.5)防治行為意圖,皆有中上程度之表現。二、介入後,實驗組在PM_(2.5)防治知識、環境敏感度、PM_(2.5)防治態度、PM_(2.5)防治自我效能與PM_(2.5)防治行為意圖上皆有顯著提升,且顯著高於對照組。三、介入前與介入後,PM_(2.5)防治行為意圖與PM_(2.5)防治知識、環境敏感度、PM_(2.5)防治態度及PM_(2.5)防治自我效能間,皆達顯著正相關。四、介入後,PM_(2.5)防治態度及PM_(2.5)防治自我效能可解釋PM_(2.5)防治行為意圖之預測力為84.6%,其中又以PM_(2.5)防治自我效能最具影響力。
The purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of the educational intervention with PM_(2.5) prevention animation course developed for high school students. PM_(2.5) prevention knowledge, environmental sensitivity, PM_(2.5) prevention attitude, PM_(2.5) prevention self-efficacy and PM_(2.5) prevention behavior intention were investigated before and after the educational intervention. The quasi-experimental design was adopted. Participants were students enrolled in a public high school in Taipei. A total of 220 students participated in this study where the experimental group (106 students) intervened with PM_(2.5) prevention animation education and the control group (114 students) did not have any intervention. The results of this study were as follows: 1. The participants had moderate to upper level of the PM_(2.5) prevention knowledge, environmental sensitivity, PM_(2.5) prevention attitude, PM_(2.5) prevention self-efficacy and PM_(2.5) prevention behavior intention in pre-test. 2. After intervention, the experimental group had significant improvement in PM_(2.5) prevention knowledge, environmental sensitivity, PM_(2.5) prevention attitude, PM_(2.5) prevention self-efficacy and PM_(2.5) prevention behavior intention. The experimental group had better scores in all above mentioned items than the control group. 3. PM_(2.5) prevention behavior intention were positively correlated with PM_(2.5) prevention knowledge, environmental sensitivity, PM_(2.5) prevention attitude and PM_(2.5) prevention self-efficacy in both pre-test and post-test. 4. PM_(2.5) prevention attitude and PM_(2.5) prevention self-efficacy explained 84.6% of the variation of PM_(2.5) prevention behavior intention after intervention, where self-efficacy was the most powerful predicting parameter.