- 期刊
Prosecuting Indirect Perpetrators of Crimes against Humanity in Eastern Germany
東德對違反人道的間接犯罪者之審判
並列摘要
This article examines the practices and experiences of administering transitional justice in postwar eastern Germany after 1945, focusing on the adjudication of informers as indirect perpetrators of crimes against humanity. Allied occupation law allowed for the prosecution of informers retroactively in the German courts through legislation specifically enacted for the purpose of prosecuting crimes against humanity. This paper examines implementation of the law and the prosecution of informers in the Soviet occupation zone, under the auspices of the Soviet military government administration, and later in the nascent German Democratic Republic of Germany. This paper also addresses the theoretical and practical problems associated with the implementation of the law and the lessons to be drawn from this historically significant attempt to call individuals to account for their crimes against humanity after they had occurred through the use of retroactive legislation.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 盧映潔（2005）。犯罪被害人保護在德國法中的發展－以犯罪被害人在刑事訴訟程序中的地位以及“犯罪人與被害人均衡協商暨再復原”制度爲探討中心。臺大法學論叢，34(3)，165-276。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2005.34.03.03
- 陳明忠（1991）。德國統一後的動亂真相─統一於資本主義的東德現況。海峽評論，(6)，76-80。https://doi.org/10.29925/SRM.199106.0020
- Bargen, J. V., & 江嘉琪 (2015). 德國行政訴訟上法官調解制度－傳統訴訟程序之外的另一種選擇. 中正大學法學集刊, (46), 1-25+27-54. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=17287618-201501-201507150002-201507150002-1-25+27-54
- 林永謀（1995）。德國陪審、參審採行之理念上觀察。法令月刊，46(1)，3-7。https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.199501_46(1).0001
- 陳婉箐（2017）。《大審判家》電影賞析－德國轉型正義 面對歷史傷痕。在野法潮，(33)，108-109。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20200220001-201704-202007150015-202007150015-108-109