Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Nikitas A. Assimakopoulos  1 and Aggeliki D. Theodosi1

1Department of Informatics University of Piraeus Karaoli & Dimitriou 80, 185 34 Piraeus, Greece


 

Received: September 8, 2002
Accepted: March 3, 2003
Publication Date: June 1, 2003

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2003.6.2.04  


ABSTRACT


In this paper we investigate essential properties of virtual enterprises and the consequent modeling requirements. Apart from that, we define agent’s autonomy. As agents in AI (Artificial Intelligence), virtual enterprises are treated as autonomous entities. Requirements are derived from two types of virtual enterprises, a repetitive and a one-of-a-kind production or service enterprise. A virtual enterprise model should represent properties which include the dynamics of decision-making, the negotiations among participants for the definition of autonomy, authority, beliefs and responsibilities, the mapping of organizational entities to decisional roles, the ability to identify and analyze a variety of conflict types and the existence of conflict resolution paths. These properties have to be analyzed by matching enterprise-engineering tools. An ontological theory is also needed to systematize the concepts that must be supported by the protocol languages for parallel distributed planning, scheduling and control algorithms in the virtual enterprise. We are presenting an approach to this problem using systemic methodologies such as TSI (Total Systems Intervention), SAST (Strategic Assumption Surfacing & Testing), SSM (Soft Systems Methodology), and PSM (Problem Structuring Methodology) in order to decompose the enterprise to autonomous entities - and trace possible problems - and solve participants disagreements in an edifying, for the enterprise, way. A useful trial example to implement and comprehend the above methodologies is that of the virtual team of an enterprise, which offers management services to hospitals and health centers in Greece.


Keywords: Systems Approach, SAST, SSM, PSM, TSI, Virtual Enterprise, Enterprise Modeling


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Bernus, P. and Nemes, L., “A Framework to Define a Generic Enterprise Reference Architecture and methodology,” ComputerIntegrated Manuf. Systems, Vol. 9, pp. 179-91 (1996).
  2. [2] Erman, L.D., Hayes-Roth, F., Lesser, V. R. and Raj Reddy, D., “The Hearsay-II Speech-Understanding System: Integrating Knowledge to Resolve Uncertainty,” Computing Surveys, Vol. 12, pp. 213-55 (1980).
  3. [3] Minsky, M. L., “The Society of Mind,” Voyager Company (1996).
  4. [4] Winograd, T., “Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design,” Addison-Wesley (1990).
  5. [5] Balasubramanian, S.; Maturana, F. P. and Norrie, D. H., “Multi-Agent Planning and Co-Ordination for Distributed Concurrent Engineering,” International Journal of Coop. Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 153-79 (1997).
  6. [6] Schmidt, K. and Simone, C., “Co-Ordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW Systems Design,” J. CSCW, Vol. 5, pp. 155-200 (1996).
  7. [7] Deen, S. M., “Co-Operation Issues in Holonic Manufacturing Systems,” IFIP Tr. B (Appl. in Techn.), B-14, pp. 401-12 (1993).
  8. [8] Tamura, S.; Luh, P. B.; Oblak, J. M. and Watanabe, S., “A Planning and Scheduling Architecture for Holonic Manufacturing Systems,” Proc. 1st World Congr. on Intell. Manuf. Processes and Sys., Vol. 2, pp. 790-801 (1995).
  9. [9] Mathews, J., “Foundations of Intelligent Manufacturing Systems: The Holonic Viewpoint,” Comp. Integ. Manuf. Syst. Vol. 8, pp. 237-43 (1995).
  10. [10] Lawson, J. W., “A Quick Look at Matrix Organization from the Perspective of the Practicing Manager,” Engineering Management International, Vol. 4, pp. 61- 70 (1986).
  11. [11] Wall, W. C., Jr., “Integrated Management in Matrix Organization,” IEEE Trans. on Eng. Mgmt, Vol. 31, pp. 30-6 (1984).
  12. [12] Malone, T. W.; Crowston, K.; Jintae Lee and Pentland, B., “Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes,” Proc. 2nd Worksh. on Enabling Technologies Infrastructure for Collab. Enterp. pp. 72-82 (1993).
  13. [13] Bernus, P.; Bertok, P. and Nemes, L., “Modeling Dynamic Management Features of Virtual Enterprises” (1998).
  14. [14] Flood, R. and Jackson, M., Creative Problem Solving, Wiley, England (1991).
  15. [15] Doumeingts, G., Fenie, P. and Chen, D., “GIM (Grai Integrated Methodology): a Methodology to Specify and to Design Advanced Manufacturing Systems,” Proc. ILCE '94. Integr. Logistics and Conc. Engineering, pp. 271-80 (1994).
  16. [16] Panayotopoulos, A. and Assimakopoulos N., “Problem Structuring in a Hospital,” European J. of Operational Research, Vol. 29, pp. 135-143 (1987).
  17. [17] Assimakopoulos, N., “Structured Total Systems Intervention Systemic MultiMethodology of Valuable Systems and Meta Systems (STIMEVIS),” Human Systems Management, Vol. 19, pp. 61-69 (2000).
  18. [18] Vernadat, F.B., “Business Process and Enterprise Activity Modeling: CIMOSA Contribution to a General Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology (GERAM),” ICARCV '94. Vol. 1, pp. 378-82 (1994).
  19. [19] Vernadat, F., Drira, K. and Azema, P., “An Integrated Description Technique for Distributed Co-Operative Applications,” CESA'96 IMACS. Comp. Eng. in Sys. Applications, pp. 608-12 (1996).
  20. [20] Kotorov, R. P., “Virtual Organization: Conceptual Analysis of the Limits of its Decentralization,” Program in Institutional Theory and History Bowling Green State University.
  21. [21] O’Leary, D., Kuokka, D. and Plant, R. “Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Organizations,” Communications of the ACM. Vol. 40, pp. 52-59 (1997).
  22. [22] Janiwski, T., Lugo, G.G. and Zheng, H., “Composing Enterprise Models: the extrended and the Virtual Enterprise,” The United Nations University, International Institute for Software Technology, Report No. 131, Feb. (1999).
  23. [23] Preston S. M., “Virtual Organization as a Process: Integrating Cognitive and Social Structure Across Time and Space”.
  24. [24] Stamps, J., Lipnack, J., Virtual Teams, John Wiley & Sons (1997).
  25. [25] Sims, O., “Enabling the Virtual Enterprise -The Internet and Object Technology are Providing the Infrastructure” (1996).
  26. [26] XC-317 Cisco IOS Switching Services Configuration Guide “Configuring Token Ring LAN Emulation for Multi-Protocol over ATM,” www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/ td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/swit ch_c/xcprt8/xcdmpotr.pdf
  27. [27] “LAN Emulation and Multi-Protocol Over ATM, ” White Paper, http://www.cabletron. com/white-papers/atm/lan-emulation.html
  28. [28] Williams, T. J., “The Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture,” Computers in Industry, Vol. 24, pp. 141-58 (1994).
  29. [29] Assimakopoulos, N., “Systemic Project Management Process for Information Systems,” Information and Decision Technologies, Vol. 19, pp. 349-364 (1994).
  30. [30] Churchman, C., “The Design of Inquiring Systems,” Basic Books, NY, U.S.A. (1971).
  31. [31] Checkland, P., “From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990’s,” J. of the O.R. Society, Vol. 36, 757-767 (1985).