文本適讀性分級架構之建立研究

The Development of a Text Leveling Framework

陳茹玲(Ju-Ling Chen) ； 蔡鑫廷(Shin-Ting Tsai) ； 宋曜廷(Yao-Ting Sung) ； 李宜憲(Yi-Shian Lee)

《教育科學研究期刊》 60卷1期 (2015/03) Pp. 1-32

https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).01

摘要

本研究首先整合閱讀理論與傳統文本分級研究，建立一「文本適讀性分級架構」，此架構包含印刷、語言與文學、體裁、內容及多樣性等五大構面，以及其下的十七類準則及五十八個適讀性指標。接著以層級分析法探討25位閱讀領域的研究與教學專家對架構中各構面、準則與適讀性指標之於文本適讀性重要性的認知。結果顯示：「內容」為影響文章理解最重要的構面，其次依序為「語言與文學」、「體裁」、「多樣性」與「印刷」構面。整體權重值最高的前五個適讀性指標為「真實性」、觀點「一致性」、「觀點數」、概念「深度」及「大眾文化」；最低為「文本尺寸」。本研究建立的「文本適讀性分級架構」，包含影響理解的各個重要構面，並可以客觀量化適讀性指標的重要性，提供更周延的文本分級。

關鍵字

層級分析法 ； 適讀性 ； 適讀性分級架構 ； 適讀性指標

並列摘要

In this study, reading theories and traditional text leveling systems were integrated and a text leveling framework comprising five aspects (i.e., print features, language and literary features, text structure, content, and diversity), 17 criteria, and 58 indicators was developed. Subsequently, 25 experts in the reading research and reading education fields were invited to assess the importance of these aspects, criteria, and indicators to text leveling. Data were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process. The results show that content was the most critical aspect influencing text comprehensibility, followed by language and literary features, text structure, diversity, and print features. Overall, the five indicators in this framework with the highest global weight were truthfulness, consistency of perspective, number of perspectives, depth of concepts, and popular culture. Text length exhibited the lowest global weight. The text leveling framework established in this study includes all the major dimensions affecting comprehension and, through objectively quantifying the importance of leveling indicators, provides highly comprehensive text leveling.

並列關鍵字

analytic hierarchy process ； leveling ； leveling framework ； leveling indicator

參考文獻

1.宋曜廷、陳茹玲、李宜憲、查日龢、曾厚強、林維駿…張國恩（2013）。中文文本可讀性探討：指標選取、模型建立與效度驗證。中華心理學刊，55（1），75-106。【Sung, Y.-T., Chen, J.-L., Lee, Y.-S., Cha, J.-H., Tseng, H.-C., Lin, W.-C., …Chang, K.-E. (2013). Investigating Chinese text readability: Linguistic features, modeling, and validation. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 75-106. 】doi:10.6129/CJP.20120621

4.Brandão, A. C., & Oakhill, J. (2005). How do you know this answer? Children's use of text data and general knowledge in story comprehension. Reading and Writing, 18, 687-713.

5.Bruce, B. C., Rubin, A., & Starr, K. S. (1981). Why readability formulas fail. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-24(1), 50-52. doi:10.1109/TPC.1981.6447826

8.Cook, L., & Mayer, R. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 448-456.

10.Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450-466.