This study intends to explore differences between the ”Chinese School” and western scholars of International Relations toward ”China Rising”. First of all, this study quotes the research approaches of the ”Chinese School”, neorealism, neoliberalism, and social constructivism, traces the established status and main viewpoints of the ”Chinese School”, and also analyzes connotation of each International Relations theories. Secondly, ”China Rising” and ”Peaceful Development” are different to China and the world. When China's comprehensive national strength is continually promoted, joined most of international organizations and accepted the rules of the international regimes, the serious problem of China is to make her national identity more flexible. That is, in order to obtain the trust of the other countries, China may use ”soft power” to modify her ”image”. Furthermore, the ”Chinese School” is not a mature school, especially the controversies in methodology, and needs to be integrated. In these differences, ”All-under-heaven System” is the most special point among International Relations theories. In East Asia, China wants to take advantage of this thought to build a ”Benevolent Rule” order instead of ”Force Rule” one. This study provides plural perspectives when we inquire ”China Rising”, and find out applicability and limitations of International Relations theories.