企業信用風險與結構型模型之預測誤差探討：管理品質觀點

Corporate Credit Risk and Structural Credit Models:Management Quality Perspectives

王秩鴻(Jhih-Hong Wang)

指導教授 ： 廖咸興

國立臺灣大學/管理學院/財務金融學研究所/碩士(2011年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.10294

摘要

根據2000年到2008年的資料，本研究從管理品質角度探討企業信用風險與結構型模型之預測誤差。我們發現管理品質確實對信用風險的評估有著顯著影響，與管理品質相關的三個因子對於評等機構與結構型模型的評等差異有18.25%到25.26%的解釋能力。此外，本研究發現管理品質效果與兩者差異為正相關，代表因管理品質提升所造成的資產波動性增加的效果大於因管理品質提升而降低代理成本的效果。

關鍵字

信用風險 ； 結構型模型 ； 代理問題 ； 管理品質 ； 資產波動

並列摘要

This work investigates the effects of management quality issues embedded in structural form credit models on firm’s credit risk evaluation using American firm data from 2000 to 2008. The findings of this research show that management quality significantly relates to the deviations in the credit risk evaluation of structural form models from agency ratings. This study finds three factors explaining 18.25% to 25.26% of the deviation and should be incorporated into credit risk modeling. Additionally, the effects of management quality positively relate to the deviation and confirm that the effects of the increase in asset volatility dominate those of the decrease in agency cost due to improvement in management quality.

並列關鍵字

Credit risk ； Structural form credit models ； Agency problems ； Management quality ； Asset volatility

參考文獻

Ang, J.S., Cole, R.A., Lin, J.W., “Agency costs and ownership structure.” Journal of Finance 55 (2000), 81-106.

Berger, A.N., Bonaccorsi di Patti, E., “Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry.” Journal of Banking and Finance 30 (2006), 1065-1102.

Bertrand, M., Schoar., A., “Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (2003), 1169–1208.

Bhandari, L.C., “Debt/equity ratio and expected common stock returns: Empirical evidence.” Journal of Finance 43 (1988), 507-528.

Black, F., Scholes, M., “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy 81 (1973), 637-654.