本研究以個案研討方式針對致揚科技目前的管理制度、跨國企業可能面臨之危機以及各種協調方式,討論於實務上採取的解決方案,和比較在應用理論基礎下所提出的方法是否能加以改善結果,同時也討論兩者在個案中之適用程度。研究發現在公司內部所存在的問題不太可能只依賴特定一種型態的協調方式做處理與解決,如針對技術層面將以中央集權的方式管理、管理公司員工的向心力則採用社會化方式作協調,最後在公司制式化的制度方面就以正式化方式做處理,加上就現階段臺灣各個企業的性質與國際化程度以及國內對於國際化政策之實行,公司內部的協調將無法如同早期企業之單純,因此在針對不同議題與面向時將採用不同的方式配合的彈性原則,藉以整合出最恰當的方式做應用;當然,得到這樣的結論之基礎是建立在以個案的方式討論公司的發展過程所面臨到的問題,表示不一定完全適用於其他產業或公司,因此使用時需要做適當的調整與修正。
The purpose of this research is to study the application of managerial regulations, the crises that multinational corporations would face, and coordination mechanisms to Prosol Corporation. We also compare the practical solutions with theoretical based methods to see which one is better. The findings show that we should use different ways to solve different problems, such as centralization for the technical ones, socialization for the coherence, and normalization for the rules. Besides, external environment is not as simple as before. That is why flexibility is also needed. However, the conclusion we get is based on this case. Therefore, adjustment has to be made when applying to other cases.