簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張儀同
Chang, Yi-Tung
論文名稱: 深度偽造政治廣告之外表吸引力、性別與公共政策類型對候選人評價、形象及投票意願影響:以台灣年輕選民為例
The Effect of Physical Attractiveness, Gender, and Political Views on Candidate Evaluations, Candidate Images, and Voters' Willingness to Vote on Deepfake Political Advertising: From the Perspective of Young Voters in Taiwan
指導教授: 林慧斐
Lin, Hui-Fei
王銀國
Wang, Yin-Kuo
口試委員: 陳聖智
Chen, Sheng-Chih
賴守誠
Lai, Shou-Cheng
王銀國
Wang, Yin-Kuo
林慧斐
Lin, Hui-Fei
口試日期: 2021/12/16
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 大眾傳播研究所
Graduate Institute of Mass Communication
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 150
中文關鍵詞: 深度偽造候選人政治廣告外表吸引力性別公共政策類型廣告可信度候選人評價候選人形象投票意願選舉
英文關鍵詞: Deepfake, Candidate, Political advertising, Physical Attractiveness, Gender, Political Views, Advertising credibility, Candidate evaluations, Candidate images, Voters' willingness to Vote, Election
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200002
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:123下載:33
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來社群媒體崛起,政治人物在選舉與行銷時,使用政治廣告影片在社群平台上宣傳時常可見,本研究試圖透過新興技術深度偽造(Deepfake)製作候選人政治廣告影片,並且模擬在臉書上發布的效果,結合期望違背理論,研究以 2 外表吸引力(外表吸引力高 vs. 外表吸引力低)x2性別(男性vs. 女性)x2公共政策類型(經濟發展 vs. 社會公平)之三因子組間實驗設計,探討三個自變項間在候選人之政治廣告影片對於年輕選民的候選人評價、候選人形象及投票意願的影響,以及廣告可信度在自變項與依變項之間的中介效果。

    本研究結果證實:(1)「外表吸引力高」的候選人,相較於「外表吸引力低」的候選人,更容易引發較正面的候選人評價、較佳的候選人形象以及較高的投票意願、(2)「女性」的候選人相較於「男性」的候選人,更容易引發較佳的候選人形象以及較高的投票意願、(3)提出「經濟發展」相關政策,相較於提出「社會公平」相關政策,更容以引發較佳的候選人形象、(4)在提出「經濟發展」相關政策時,外表吸引力較「高」之候選人會比外表吸引力較「低」的候選人,更容易引發較佳的候選人形象、較高的投票意願、(5)廣告可信度在外表吸引力、性別、公共政策類型與候選人評價、候選人形象與投票意願間無中介效果影響。

    With the rapid development of social media, politicians often post their political advertising videos on Facebook or Instagram to promote themselves when they are preparing for the election. Therefore, this research intends to use the expectancy violations theory as a basis, and make simulation with Deepfake to design a 3-factor between-subject experiment composed of Physical Attractiveness (high vs. low), Gender (Male vs. Female), and Political Views (economic development vs. social justice). The experiment aims to examine whether the variables could affect candidate evaluations, candidate images, and voters’ willingness to vote. It also tests the mediation effect advertising credibility has on the relationship between three independent variables and three dependent variables.

    The results of this research show that: (1) compared to candidates with low physical attractiveness, those with high physical attractiveness tend to receive positive comments, better candidate images, and higher voters’ willingness to vote; (2) compared to the male, female has a better candidate images and inspires higher voters’ willingness to vote; (3) compared to the social justice, policies related to economic development leads to a better candidate images; (4) when the candidate proposed policies about economic development, those with higher physical attractiveness leads to better candidate images and higher voters’ willingness to vote, compared to those with low physical attractiveness. (5) advertising credibility shows no mediation effect between 3 independent variables (Physical Attractiveness, Gender, and Political Views) and 3 dependent variables(Candidate evaluations, Candidate images, and Voters’ willingness to vote).

    謝誌 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 表目錄 x 圖目錄 xii 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景、動機與目的 1 第二節、研究問題 7 第貳章 文獻回顧 8 第一節、深度偽造技術發展沿革 8 一、深度偽造技術發展與現況 8 二、目前檢測深度偽造影像方式 13 三、深度偽造的相關研究 16 第二節、外表吸引力 18 ㄧ、外表吸引力定義及相關研究 18 二、外表吸引力在政治上之體現 22 第三節、性別 23 一、性別、性別刻板印象及相關研究 23 二、性別基模理論 25 三、小結 26 第四節、公共政策類型 27 一、公共政策類型及相關研究 27 二、小結 30 第五節、候選人評價、候選人形象相關研究 31 一、候選人評價 31 二、候選人形象 32 第六節、投票意願相關研究 35 第七節、期望違背理論 36 第八節、廣告可信度 38 第九節、假設推導 40 一、外表吸引力與候選人評價、候選人形象及投票意願關係 40 二、性別與候選人評價、候選人形象及投票意願關係 42 三、公共政策類型與候選人評價、形象及投票意願關係 43 四、外表吸引力與性別的交互關係 44 五、外表吸引力與公共政策類型的交互關係 45 六、性別與公共政策類型的交互關係 46 七、外表吸引力、性別與公共政策類型的交互關係 47 八、廣告可信度之中介效果 48 第參章 實驗方法 49 第一節、研究背景、動機與目的 49 第二節、實驗設計與刺激物 50 一、實驗設計 50 二、自變項的定義與操弄 51 (一)外表吸引力(外表吸引力高 vs. 外表吸引力低) 51 (二)性別(男 vs. 女) 52 (三)公共政策類型(經濟發展 vs. 社會公平) 52 第三節、前測:政治人物知名度測試及自變項操弄檢定 53 ㄧ、自變項測量問項 53 (一)政治人物知名度 53 (二)面貌聯想 53 (三)性別:男與女 54 (四)外表吸引力:外表吸引力高與外表吸引力低 54 二、前測一:政治人物知名度 55 三、前測二:面貌聯想與自變項操弄檢定(外表吸引力、性別) 56 第四節、依變項與中介變項衡量 59 ㄧ、候選人評價 59 二、候選人形象 59 三、投票意願 60 四、中介變項 60 第五節、主實驗刺激物呈現、實驗程序 61 ㄧ、主實驗刺激物呈現 61 二、實驗程序 62 第肆章 研究結果 63 第一節、樣本結構與敘述統計 63 第二節、信度分析 65 第三節、正式實驗之操弄檢定 66 一、外表吸引力操弄檢定結果 66 二、性別操弄檢定結果 67 三、公共政策類型操弄檢定結果 67 第四節、研究假設之驗證 68 一、外表吸引力對候選人評價、候選人形象與投票意願之影響 70 (一)外表吸引力對候選人評價之影響 70 (二)外表吸引力對候選人形象之影響 70 (三)外表吸引力對投票意願之影響 71 二、性別對候選人評價、候選人形象與投票意願之影響 71 (一)性別對候選人評價之影響 71 (二)性別對候選人形象之影響 71 (三)性別對投票意願之影響 72 三、公共政策類型對候選人評價、候選人形象與投票意願之影響 72 (一)公共政策類型對候選人評價之影響 72 (二)公共政策類型對候選人形象之影響 72 (三)公共政策類型對投票意願之影響 73 四、外表吸引力與性別對候選人評價、候選人形象與投票意願之影響 73 (一)外表吸引力與性別對候選人評價之交互效果 73 (二)外表吸引力與性別對候選人形象之交互效果 73 (三)外表吸引力與性別對投票意願之交互效果 74 五、外表吸引力與公共政策類型對候選人評價、候選人形象與投票意願之影響 74 (一)外表吸引力與公共政策類型對候選人評價之交互效果 74 (二)外表吸引力與公共政策類型對候選人形象之交互效果 74 (三)外表吸引力與公共政策類型對投票意願之交互效果 75 六、性別與公共政策類型對候選人評價、候選人形象與投票意願之影響 75 (一)性別與公共政策類型對候選人評價之交互效果 75 (二)性別與公共政策類型對候選人形象之交互效果 76 (三)性別與公共政策類型對投票意願之交互效果 76 七、外表吸引力、性別與公共政策類型對候選人評價、候選人形象與投票意願之影響 76 (一)外表吸引力、性別與公共政策類型對候選人評價之交互效果 76 (二)外表吸引力、性別與公共政策類型對候選人形象之交互效果 77 (三)外表吸引力、性別與公共政策類型對投票意願之交互效果 77 八、中介效果 77 (一)外表吸引力、性別、公共政策類型對候選人評價的影響 78 (二)外表吸引力、性別、公共政策類型對候選人形象的影響 82 (三)外表吸引力、性別、公共政策類型對投票意願的影響 85 第五節、研究假設檢定結果 89 第伍章 結論與建議 92 第一節、研究結果討論 92 一、「外表吸引力高」的候選人相較於「外表吸引力低」的候選人,更容易引發較正面的候選人評價、較佳的候選人形象以及較高的投票意願 93 二、「女性」的候選人相較於「男性」的候選人,更容易引發較佳的候選人形象與較高的投票意願 94 三、相較於提出「社會公平」相關政策,提出「經濟發展」相關政策之候選人會引發較佳的候選人形象 96 四、不論「高外表吸引力」或是「低外表吸引力」,搭配「男性」或是「女性」,對候選人評價、候選人形象與投票意願皆不會產生直接影響 97 五、在提出「經濟發展」相關政策時,外表吸引力較「高」之候選人會比外表吸引力較「低」的候選人,更容易引發較佳的候選人形象、較高的投票意願 98 六、不論「男性」或是「女性」,搭配「經濟發展」或是「社會公平」政策,對候選人評價、候選人形象以及投票意願皆不會產生直接影響 99 七、「外表吸引力」、「性別」以及「公共政策類型」對於候選人評價、候選人形象以及投票意願的交互作用影響 100 八、廣告可信度在「高反差」與「候選人評價」、「高反差」與候選人形象以及「高反差」與「投票意願」三者皆無中介效果 101 第二節、學術貢獻與實務建議 102 一、學術貢獻 102 二、實務建議 103 第三節、研究限制、未來研究方向與建議 104 一、實驗進行過程之限制 104 二、深度偽造技術之限制 104 三、素人候選人之限制 105 四、公共政策類型呈現之限制 105 五、未來研究方向與建議 105 (一)公共政策類型操弄之建議 106 (二)圖像與文字操弄之建議 106 參考文獻 107 中文文獻 107 英文文獻 117 附錄一、前測一問卷 139 附錄二、前測二問卷 140 附錄三、主實驗問卷 146

    中文文獻
    Dr. Lo(2020年7月17日)。吸引力的心理學知識。Lo's Psychology心理學科普平台。https://lospsychology.com/
    Dye, T. R.(2010)。公共政策新論〔羅清俊、陳志瑋譯〕。韋伯。(原著出版年:1998)
    V太太(2020年03月30日)。你的情慾不是你的情慾:當「未經同意散布私密影像」成為一種龐大產業。聯合新聞網。https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/120732/4454085
    文潔琳、蕭閔云(2021年07月16日)。打擊「照騙」?挪威立法規定網紅、廠商修圖需註明,「外貌焦慮」能就此打破嗎?數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/63905/retouch
    王宏仁(2018年07月01日)。【假新聞產業化的威脅越來越嚴重】事實查核浪潮開始崛起。iThome新聞。https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/124044
    王涵、廖國鋒、何兆華(2019)。廣告訴求與廣告可信度對廣告效果之影響—以綠色服飾為例。紡織綜合研究期刊,29(2),41 – 53。http://dx.doi.org/10.6439/TTRJ
    王嵩音(2010)。台灣選民媒介使用對於候選人形象與評價之影響:傳統媒介vs.新媒介。傳播與管理研究,10(1),3-35。http://dx.doi.org/10.6430/CMR
    王鼎銘(2003)。政策認同下的投票效用與選擇:空間投票理論在不同選舉制度間的比較。選舉研究,10(1),171-206。http://dx.doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2003.10.01.171-206
    丘昌泰(2008)。公共政策:基礎篇。巨流出版。
    台灣事實查核中心(2020年09月03日)【精細的合成畫面】 國外事實查核組織揭穿「拜登睡覺」的假影片。台灣事實查核中心。https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/articles/4410
    石子軒(2012)。選民對總統候選人之屬性偏好研究-以聯合分析法為例〔未出版之碩士學位論文〕。國立成功大學國際企業研究所。http://dx.doi.org/10.6844/NCKU.2012.00009
    李予綱(2010)。選民對候選人刻板印象對選舉結果的影響(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC98-2410-H110-012-MY2)。高雄市:國立中山大學政治經濟學系。
    李予綱(2014)。娃娃臉效應對政治候選人的評價及選舉結果之影響(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC101-2410-H110-030-MY3)。高雄市:國立中山大學政治經濟學系。
    李立峯(2020)。後真相時代的社會運動、媒體,和資訊政治:香港反修例運動的經驗。中華傳播學刊,37,3-41。http://dx.doi.org/10.6195/CJCR
    李承達、駱明慶(2008)。美貌對候選人得票率的影響-以2004年立委選舉為例。經濟論文叢刊,36(1),67-113。http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/172635812020060037001
    李秉芳(2018年10月06日)。日本媒體調查「關西機場」事件,指台灣面臨「假新聞危機」。The News Lens 關鍵評論。https://www.thenewslens.com/article/105576
    李美枝(1984)。女性心理學。臺北市:大洋出版社。
    李郁青(1996)。媒介議題設定效果的第二面向-候選人形象設定效果研究〔未出版之碩士學位論文〕。國立政治大學新聞研究所。
    李奕慧、張晉芬(2007)。“女人的家事”、“男人的家事”:家事分工性別化的持續與解釋。人文及社會科學集刊,19(2),203-229。http://dx.doi.org/10.6350/JSSP.200706.0203
    李祥銘(2009)。以品牌權益的觀點探討負面攻擊廣告對候選人之影響。廣告學研究,33,105-138。
    李筱雯(2019年05月31日)。假新聞全新進化:挑戰民主的「深度偽造」科技。鳴人堂。https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/12705/3845391
    李慧貞、潘愷、謝佳容(2017)。性別主流化課程訓練對護理系學生性別刻板印象與角色態度影響效果之研究。中華心理衛生學刊,30(4),359-384。http://dx.doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201712_30(4).0002
    李錦河(1999)。「選民需求指標」選舉預測模式應用於「多人參選當選多席次」之選舉研究—以1988年台南市安南區市議員選舉為例。選舉研究,6(1),31-66。http://dx.doi.org/10.6612/tjes.1999.06.01.31-66
    李錦河、溫敏杰、陳盈太(2010)。「品牌知名度」理念應用於選舉預測之探討-以台灣選舉民意調查資料爲例。選舉研究,17(1),1-19。http://dx.doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2010.17.01.01-19
    余和謙(2019)。人工智慧之治理-以深度偽造為例,科技法律透析,31(8),52-72。http://dx.doi.org/10.7062/STLR
    杜慧娟(2010)。兒童英語教材性別角色刻板印象之內容分析〔未出版之碩士學位論文〕。國立台北護理學院。
    弄假成真:深入「深偽技術」的世界及其對品牌的影響(2020年10月)。Appier部落格。https://www.appier.com/zh-hant/blog/perception-as-reality-inside-the-world-of-deepfake-and-what-it-means-to-brands/
    巫永平、鄭博宇(2014)。由競選廣告檢視選民之認知特性。公共事務評論,15(1),1-20。
    何金銘(2000)。第十三屆縣市長選舉候選人勝選因素分析(行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC 87-2414-H-110-004)。高雄市:國立中山大學中山學術研究中心。
    吳定(2017)。公共政策。五南圖書出版。
    吳紹瑜(2020年9月13日)。【深度造假】台灣女網紅臉部遭駭客移植A片 登上全球情色網站。蘋果日報。https://tw.appledaily.com/home/
    吳謹安(2019年07月31日)。為何人們喜歡傳假新聞?假新聞的傳播與心理學。沃草Watchout。https://uc.watchout.tw/read/aZPEQD3OJygTduKrb96S
    林玗靜、戴敏育、汪志堅、陳建彰(2017)。植基於文字探勘的立委候選人選舉政見相似度分析。載於王勝石(主持人),開放資料〔研討會〕。2017年台灣網際網路研討會暨資訊學門成果發表會,台中市,台灣。
    林岱緯、林品華、羅良慧、林明宜、王怡惠、羅濟威、莊裕澤(2020)。2019我國百大社會課題調查研究-重要度與政策回應期待解析。臺北市:財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
    林政谷(2014)。候選人形象、外貌特質與投票行為之研究:以北區大學生眼動儀實驗為例〔未出版之博士學位論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所。
    林照真(2020)。假新聞類型與媒體聚合:以 2018 年臺灣選舉為例。新聞學研究,142,111-153。http://dx.doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202001_(142).0003
    林燕卿、駱俊宏(2003)。性別刻板印象對男性護理人員的影響。臺灣性學學刊,9(2),95-105。http://dx.doi.org/10.6784/FJS.200309.0095
    林瓊珠(2008)。議題、候選人評價、黨派意識-2006年台北市長選舉投票行爲研究。臺灣民主季刊,5(2),59-87。http://dx.doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.200806.0059
    林瓊珠(2016)。書評:When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections〔性別何時才有意義?美國選舉中的女性 候選人和性別刻板印象〕by Kathleen A. Dolan〔凱薩琳•多藍〕(Oxford University Press, 2014, Hardback, 264 pp., ISBN 9780199968275)。臺灣民主季刊,13(2),183-188。
    金溥聰(1997)。報紙的形象設定效果研究:以民國八十三年台北市市長選舉為例。新聞學研究,55,203-223。http://dx.doi.org/10.30386/MCR.199707_(55).0012
    周軒逸、江彥廷(2020)。負面競選廣告設計之效果:議題/形象訴求、醜化對手之照片或漫畫與色調運用。傳播與社會學刊,51,141-198。
    周樹華、單舟、Maxwell, L. C.與Kim, Y.(2017)。政壇無小節:政治糗聞在總統選舉報道中的角色分析。傳播與社會學刊,42,255-303。
    周樹華、閻岩(2015)。媒體可信度研究:起源,發展,機會和挑戰。傳播與社會學刊,33 ,255-297。
    姜林清(2003)。台灣選民的議題投票行為-空間理論的探析。〔未出版之碩士學位論文〕。國立中山大學政治學研究所。
    俞振華、蔡佳泓(2011)。社會公平與經濟發展:台灣民眾的政策意向之初探。社會科學論叢,5(2),135-172。http://dx.doi.org/10.30401/RSS.201110_5(2).0006
    胡佛、游盈隆(1983)。選民的投票取向:結構與類型的分析。政治學報,11,225-178。
    高慧馨(2020年03月20日)。Deepfake-深度造假報導(上)。AI法律評論網。https://www.aili.com.tw/message2_detail/60.htm#
    徐瑞壕(2020年07月03日)。「FaceApp的資安疑慮」之專家回應。台灣科技媒體中心。https://smctw.tw/6781/
    莊文忠、林瓊珠、鄭夙芬、張鐙文(2018)。婦女保障名額制度與選舉競爭對女性參政的影響:以 2000 年至 2010 年縣市議員選舉為例。台灣政治學刊,22(2),1- 46。http://dx.doi.org/10.6683/TPSR.201812_22(2).0001
    許志仲、莊易修(2020年03月24日)。孰真孰假誰能分辨?談AI偽造影像帶來的危機。新興科技媒體中心。https://smctw.tw/3352/
    許禎元(2014)。候選人形象、外貌特質與投票行為之研究:以北區大學生眼動儀實驗為例。〔未出版之博士學位論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所。
    許嘉恬(2020年08月23日)。台灣女性參政在亞洲名列前茅,但立委的性平觀念與知識仍落後。The News Lens 關鍵評論。https://www.thenewslens.com/article/139504
    陳方隅(2019年4月12日)。台灣「接收境外假資訊」嚴重程度被專家評為世界第一+V-Dem資料庫簡介。菜市場政治學。https://whogovernstw.org/2019/04/12/whogovernstw9/?fbclid=IwAR2v0IX7IgYHW9ZmSToxzDf5kGqT9VMJC6mv84VkUCvYd9P4pcd9k_8tsOQ
    陳世敏(1992)。候選人形象與選民投票行為。新聞學研究,46,149-168。http://dx.doi.org/10.30386/MCR.199209_(46).0010
    陳虹瑾、陳昌遠、蔣宜婷(2021年05月06日)。臉被偷走之後:無法可管的數位性暴力?台灣Deepfake事件獨家調查。鏡週刊。https://www.mirrormedia.mg/projects/deepfaketaiwan/index.html#chapter6
    陳建丞(2005)應徵者外表吸引力對面試官評量之影響-以面試官訓練為干擾變數。人力資源管理學報,5(4),55-66。http://dx.doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.2005.0504.02
    陳信助(2000)。總統候選人形象研究:以兩千年總統大選候選人連戰、宋楚瑜、陳水扁為例〔未出版之碩士學位論文〕。淡江大學傳播學系。
    陳義彥、黃麗秋(1992)。選舉行為與政治發展。臺北市:黎明文化。
    陳銘薰、李祥銘(2009)。競選廣告可信度對候選人品牌權益及選民投票意願之影響-以正負面競選廣告爲例。商管科技季刊,10(1),29-69。http://dx.doi.org/10.30083/CMQ.200903.0002
    陳瑩雪(2021年12月02日)。嚴懲小玉+林秉樞們 政院加速性私密影像罪、Deepfake犯罪修法。上報。https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?SerialNo=131458
    孫武文(1997)。選舉與政治認知:傳播媒體對民主政治的影響。新聞學研究,54,189-209。
    孫蒨如、楊守城(2006)。外表吸引力對自我評價的影響──自我層面的調節作用。教育與心理研究,29(3),571-597。
    張春興(1991)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。
    張卿卿(1999)。女性候選人在選舉中的優劣勢-以八十六年台北縣縣長候選人周荃為例。選舉研究,6(1),111-141。http://dx.doi.org/10.6612/tjes.1999.06.01.111-141
    張傳賢(2012)。政黨認同、負面資訊的競爭與選民投票抉擇:2010 年五都選舉的實證研究。選舉研究,19(2),37-70。http://dx.doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2012.19.02.37-70
    張競之、王又鵬、曾忠蕙(2016)。銷售人員外表吸引力與說服策略以及消費者人格特質對衝動性購買服飾傾向的影響。創新與管理,12(2),1-28。
    盛治仁(2000)。總統選舉預測探討-以情感溫度計預測未表態選民的應用。選舉研究,7(2),75-107。http://dx.doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2000.07.02.75-107
    單驥(1987)。用經濟學的邊際觀念-談競選的熱門政見。經濟前瞻,5,138。http://dx.doi.org/10.30071/EOB.198701.0026
    勞動部(2019)。性別勞動統計分析。http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/woman/108/108woanalyze01.pdf
    傅明穎(1998)。北市選民的候選人評價與投票決定。台灣政治學刊,3,195-243。http://dx.doi.org/10.6683/TPSR.199812_(3).0004
    黃秀端(2005)。候選人形象、候選人情感溫度計、與總統選民投票行為。臺灣民主季刊,2(4),1-30。http://dx.doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.200512.0001
    黃欣怡(2009)。電視購物代言人廣告效果之研究〔未出版之碩士學位論文〕。國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所。
    聖誕節:英國電視台Channel 4製作「深度仿冒」女王致辭(2020年12月)。BBC News 中文。https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/uk-55435659
    鈕則勳(2005)。政治廣告:理論與實務。揚智文化。
    楊孟麗(2003)。投票意願與經濟不景氣:台灣的情形。選舉研究,10(2),159-191。http://dx.doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2003.10.02.159-191
    楊智傑(2020年02月27日)。被假新聞耽誤的黑科技:Deepfake!在影音行銷時代,大玩「變臉商機」的優勢。未來商務。https://fc.bnext.com.tw/
    楊婉瑩(2008)。書評:Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates〔評論Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates,Kathleen A. Dolan 著〕。臺灣民主季刊,4,253-259。http://dx.doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.200812.0253
    楊婉瑩、林珮婷(2010)。她們為什麼投給馬英九?探討2008年總統大選的性別差距。選舉研究,17(1),91-128。http://dx.doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2010.17.01.91-128
    蒙志成、龔俊嘉(2018)。台灣選民投票行為的認知心理因素:以功能性腦造影實驗設計探索「候選人相貌」對投票抉擇的影響(科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告,MOST 103-2420-H-006-003-MY3)。台南市:國立成功大學政治學系。
    廖達琪、李承訓、陳柏宇(2013)。選舉制度與立法者競選政見及立法表現:臺灣立法院第六屆及第七屆區域立委之比較。選舉研究,20(1),73-119。http://dx.doi.org/ 10.6612/tjes.2013.20.01.73-119
    鄭自隆(1992)。選舉文宣策略:廣告、傳播與政治行銷。遠流出版社。
    鄭自隆(1995)。競選廣告:理論、策略、硏究案例。正中書局。
    鄭夙芬(2014)。候選人因素與投票抉擇-以2012年臺灣總統選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊,11(1),103-151。
    鄭夙芬、陳陸輝、劉嘉薇(2005)。2004年總統選舉中的候選人因素。臺灣民主季刊,2(2),31-70。http://dx.doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.200506.0031
    劉辰宜(2015)。候選人外表吸引力與性別及正負面競選廣告類型對廣告態度之影響—以年輕選民為例〔未出版之碩士學位論文〕。天主教輔仁大學企業管理學系。
    劉念夏(2007)。候選人評價的選舉效應-以2004年總統選舉為例。選舉評論,2,1-37。http://dx.doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.200506.0031
    劉芮菁(2021年02月02日)。台灣團隊研究辨識Deep Fake影片 深偽技術的正邪之戰開打。台灣事實查核中心。https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/
    劉致昕(2019年04月23日)。深入全球假新聞之都,看「境外網軍」是如何煉成的?報導者The Reporter。https://www.twreporter.org/a/cyberwarfare-units-disinformation-fake-news-north-macedonia
    潘國華(1998)。總統候選人形象研究:以一九九六年總統直選為例〔未出版之碩士學位論文〕。國立政治大學新聞研究所。
    潘翰聲(2012)。綠黨跨越門檻的最後一階2012 選舉結果探討與2016 路線展望。生態臺灣,35,73-80。http://dx.doi.org/10.29820/TAE.201204.0012
    蔡佳泓、俞振華(2011)。地方政府如何回應民意? 以2006-2007 年為例。台灣政治學刊,15(1),73-136。http://dx.doi.org/10.6683/TPSR.201106.15(1).73-136
    蔡佳靜(2006)。廣告模特兒外表吸引力的迷思?-不同男性產品之探討。廣告學研究,25,107-129。http://dx.doi.org/10.30412/TJAPR.200601_(25).0005
    蔡佳靜、劉建志(2015)。服務補救人員的外表吸引力重要嗎?-蠻橫顧客不當行為類型與服務補救策略之影響。管理與系統,22(4),381-406。
    蔡雲卿、王嵩音(2020)。差異收穫模式與交叉壓力的結合:以2018年嘉義縣市長選舉為例。新聞學研究,143,113-165。http://dx.doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202004_(143).0003
    謝復生、牛銘實、林慧萍(1995)。民國八十三年省市長選舉中之議題投票:理性抉擇理論之分析。選舉研究,2(1),77-92。
    蕭至惠、陳冠仰、陳令芷(2020)。訊息可信度、廣告迴避、網頁適配程度與廣告效果之研究。行銷科學學報,16(1),55-80。http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/181666012020041601003
    蕭怡靖(2016)。議題重要性的測量與應用(科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告,MOST104-2410-H032-028)。新北市:淡江大學公共行政學系。
    蕭怡靖(2017)。競選期間選民對候選人評價的變化: 以 2012 年台灣總統選舉為例。選舉研究,24(2),1-38。http://dx.doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2017.24.02.01-38
    蕭閔云(2020年01月07日)。韓國瑜拍電影了?新創用Deepfake惡搞候選人,這是神創作還是惡趣味?。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/
    聯合行銷研究股份有限公司(2019)。108 年個人家戶數位機會調查報告(國家發展委員會委託之專題研究成果報告,AE010017)。臺北市:國家發展委員會。
    簡恆宇(2018年12月18日)。境外勢力干預選舉經典案例》美國國會報告:俄羅斯「社群網戰」全方位助選川普、Instagram成最主要工具。風傳媒。https://www.storm.mg/article/724737?page=1
    羅世宏(2018)。關於「假新聞」的批判思考:老問題、新挑戰與可能的多重解方。資訊社會研究,35,51-85。http://dx.doi.org/10.29843/JCCIS.201807_(35).0003
    蘇蘅(2019)。傳播研究方法新論。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
    嚴祥鸞(2011)。性別主流化:女性在地方的政治參與。政治與政策,1(2),47-64。

    英文文獻
    de-Oliveira, M., Almeida, C., & Mainardes, E. (2021). Politics and social media: an analysis of factors anteceding voting intention. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00301-7
    Aalberg, T., & Jenssen, A. T. (2017). Gender stereotyping of political candidates. Nordicom Review, 28(1), 17-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0198
    Afifi, W. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (2000). The impact of violations on uncertainty and the consequences for attractiveness. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 203–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00756.x
    Ahearne, M., Gruen, T., & Jarvis, C. (1999). If looks could sell: Moderation and mediation of the attractiveness effect on salesperson performance. Inter-national Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(4), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(99)00014-2
    Ajder, H., Patrini, G., Cavalli, F., & Cullen, L. (2019). The state of deepfakes: landscape, threats, and impact. Sensity.
    Alexander, D., & Andersen, K. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 527-545. https://doi.org/10.2307/448946
    Almendros, C., Aramayona, B., García-Sánchez, R., López, J. S., Martín, M. J., Martínez, J. M., & Soria-Oliver, M. (2019). Are sexist attitudes and gender stereotypes linked? A critical feminist approach with a spanish sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02410
    Amerini, I., Bimbo, A. D., Caldelli, R., & Galteri, L. (2019). Deepfake video detection through optical flow based cnn [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) Workshops, Seoul, South Korea. https://doi.org/0.1109/ICCVW.2019.00152
    Amerini, I., & Caldelli, R. (2020). Exploiting prediction error inconsistencies through LSTM-based classifiers to detect deepfake videos [Paper presentation]. 2020 ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security, Cyberspace. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369412.3395070
    Argo, J., Dahl, D., & Morales, A. (2018). Positive consumer contagion: Responses to attractive others in a retail context. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 690-701. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.690
    Ashish, B. K. K., Bokde, N. D., Geem, Z. W., Hashmi, M. F., Keskar, A. G., & Yoon, J. H. (2020). An exploratory analysis on visual counterfeits using conv-lstm hybrid architecture. IEEE Access, 8, 101293-101308. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998330
    Atkin, J. L., & Beltramini, R. F. (2007). Exploring the perceived believability of DTC advertising in the US. Journal of Marketing Communications, 13(3), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260701250695
    Atkinson, M., Enos, R., & Hill, S. (2009). Candidate faces and election outcomes: Is the face–vote correlation Caused by candidate selection. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4(3), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00008062
    Beckers, T., Klein, M., & Rosar, U. (2007). The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia state election of 2005. European Journal of Political Research, 47(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00720.x
    Bae, S. W., Wright, L. B., & Taylor, R. D. (2001). Print advertising context effects: The influence of media credibility on advertisement credibility. Journal of Promotion Management, 6(1-2), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1300/J057v06n01_08
    Baesler, E. J., Burgoon, J. K., Newton, D. A., & Walther, J. B. (1989). Nonverbal expectancy violations and conversational involvement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13(2), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990793
    Bailenson, J., Garland, P., Iyengar, S., & Yee, Nick. (2006). Transformed facial similarity as a political cue: A preliminary Investigation. Political Psychology, 27(3), 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00505.x
    Baireddy, S., Bartusiak, E., Delp, E. J., Hao, H., Montserrat, D. M., Shao, R., …Yarlagadda, S. K. (2020). Deepfakes detection with automatic face weighting [Paper presentation]. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Seattle, United States. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00342
    Banducci, S., Karp, J., Rallings, C., & Thrasher, M. (2008). Ballot photographs as cues in low-Information elections. Political Psychology, 29(6), 903-917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00672.x
    Barari, S., Lucas, C., & Munger, K. (2021). Political deepfake videos misinform the public, but no more than other fake media. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/cdfh3
    Bastian, J., Evans, A. M., & van Beest, I. (2020). Facial appearance and electoral success of male Italian politicians: Are trustworthy-looking candidates more successful in corrupt regions? Social Psychology, 52(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000427
    Brann, M., & Himes, K. L. (2010). Perceived credibility of male versus female television newscasters. Communication Research Reports, 27(3), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824091003737869
    Beltramini, R. F. (1988). Perceived believability of warning label information presented in cigarette advertising. Journal of Advertising, 17(2), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1988.10673110
    Beltramini, R. F., & Evans, K. R. (1985). Perceived believability of research results information in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 14(3), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1985.10672953
    Beltramini, R. F., & Sirsi, A. K. (1992). Physician information acquisition and believability. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 12(4), 52-59.
    Beltramini, R. F., & Stafford, E. R. (1993). Comprehension and perceived believability of seals of approval information in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 22(3), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1993.10673407
    Beltramini, R. F., Evans, K. R., & Stan, S. (2000). Believability and comprehension of nutrition information in advertising. American Marketing Association, 11, 53-61.
    Benson, P. L., Karabenick, S. A., & Lerner, R. M. (1976). Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(5), 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(76)90073-1
    Berggren, N., Jordahl, H., & Poutvaara, P. (2010). The looks of a winner: beauty, gender and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics, 94 (1-2), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002
    Bern, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354-364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
    Bersheid, E., Dion, K., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
    Bohan, L., Harris, K., McCafferty, P., & Rosenberg, S. W. (1986). The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Voter Preference. American Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111296
    Bower, A. B., & Landreth, S. (2001). Is beauty best? Highly versus normally attractive models in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673627
    Brody, R. A., & Page, B, I. (1972). Comment: The assessment of policy voting. The American Political Science Review, 66(2), 450-458. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957788
    Buil, I., Chernatony, L. d., & Martínez, E. (2013). Examining the role of advertising and sales promotions in brand equity creation. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.030
    Butler, D., & Stokes, D. (1974). Political change in Britain. Macmillan Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02048-5
    Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12 (1/2), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X93121003
    Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55(1), 58-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376158
    Burns, L. H. (1987). Infertility and the sexual health of the family. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 13, 30-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614576.1987.11074906
    Busch, C., & Khodabakhsh, A. (2020). A Generalizable Deepfake Detector based on Neural Conditional Distribution Modelling [Paper presentation]. 2020 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG), Darmstadt, Germany. Abstract retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9211032?arnumber=9211032
    Butcher, M. (2019). The startup behind that deep-fake David Beckham video just raised $3M. TechCrunch. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/
    Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
    Carmines, E. G., & James, A. S. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74 (1), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955648
    Cassese, E. C. & Holman, M. R. (2018). Party and gender stereotypes in campaign attacks. Political Behavior, 40, 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9423-7
    Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgments. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 5(6), 547-562.
    Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1387
    Chang, C. (1996). Viewers’ response to female candidates’ political advertising [Paper presentation]. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication meeting, California, United States. Abstract retrieved from http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/LiteratureEvents_detail.asp?LE_ID=3434&LEC_ID=15&SLEC_No=68
    Chang, M. C., Li, Y., & Lyu, S. (2018). In ictu oculi: Exposing ai generated fake face videos by detecting eye blinking [Paper presentation]. IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), Hong Kong. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2018.8630787
    Chan, C., Efros, A. A., Ginosar, S., & Zhou, T. (2019). Everybody dance now [Paper presentation]. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, South Korea. Abstract retrieved from https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_ICCV_2019/html/Chan_Everybody_Dance_Now_ICCV_2019_paper.html
    Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107, 1753-1820. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3213954
    Choi, S., & Rifon, N. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of web advertising credibility: a study of consumer response to banner ads. Journal of interactive Advertising, 3(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2002.10722064
    Coats, G., Hosoda, M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x
    Coe, C., Nicholson, Stephen., & Song, A. (2016). The politics of beauty: the effects of partisan bias on physical attractiveness. Political Behavior, 38, 883-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9339-7
    Collins, B. (2019, June 13). This viral Schwarzenegger deepfake isn't just entertaining. It's a warning. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/
    Davis, L. S., Han, X., Morariu, V. I., & Zhou, P. (2018). Learning rich features for image manipulation detection [Paper presentation]. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Utah, Abstract retrieved from https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/cvpr/2018/17D45VtKirt
    Delp, E. J., & Güera, D. (2018). Deepfake Video Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks [Paper presentation]. 2018 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), Auckland. https://doi.org/10.1109/AVSS.2018.8639163.
    Dewey, C. (2016, Jan 14). Behind the scenes of Face Swap Live, the ‘creepy’ app that launched a thousand memes. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/
    Diakopoulos, N., & Johnson, D. (2020). Anticipating and addressing the ethical implications of deepfakes in the context of elections. New Media & Society, 1, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820925811
    Dipboye, R. L., Gehrlein, T. M., & Shahani, C. (1993). Attractiveness bias in the interview: Exploring the boundaries of an effect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14(3), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1403_5
    Dobber, T., Metoui, N., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. (2021). Do (microtargeted) deepfakes have real effects on political attitudes? International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220944364
    Dolan, K. (2013). Gender stereotypes, candidate evaluations, and voting for women candidates: What really matters? Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913487949
    Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 2, 458-476. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
    Echizen, I., Nguyen, H.H., & Yamagishi, J. (2019). Use of a capsule network to detect fake images and videos. ArXiv. abs/1910.12467.
    Edell, J., & Burke, M. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 421-33. https://doi.org/10.1086/209124
    Evans, G. (2019, Aug 29). This deep fake video of Alison Brie with Jim Carrey's face is genuinely terrifying. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/
    Fang, S., Li, Y., & Zhang, C. (2020). Physical attractiveness of service employees and customer engagement in tourism industry. Annals of Tourism Research, 80, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102756
    Farley, S. D., Chia, R. C., & Allred, L. J. (1998). Stereotypes about attractiveness: When beautiful is not better. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 479–492.
    Fisher, R. (2017, October, 19). BBC Future created a composite face of all members of the US Senate and House of Representatives. Here’s what it tells us about US politics in 2017, and how the Democrats and Republicans differ. BBC FUTURE. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20171018-this-is-the-face-of-the-average-american-politician
    Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of Impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2
    Foroudi, P., Hussain, S., Melewar, T.C., & Priporas, C.V. (2020). Examining the effects of advertising credibility on brand credibility, corporate credibility and corporate image: a qualitative approach. Qualitative Market Research, 23(4), 549-573. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-12-2017-0175
    Fox, R., & Smith, E. (2001). The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 205-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/449215
    Frieze, I., H., Olson, J. E., & Russell, J. (1991). Attractiveness and income for men and women in management. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1039-1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00458.x
    Gorvett, Z. (2017, Oct 19). A candidate’s appearance can influence votes more than you think – so what exactly is a good look for a politician? BBC FUTURE. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20171018-the-hidden-ways-that-faces-shape-politics
    Gupta, A., Obaidat, M. S., Patel, M., & Tanwar, S. (2020) Trans-DF: A Transfer Learning-based end-to-end Deepfake Detector [Paper presentation]. 2020 IEEE 5th International Conference on Computing Communication and Automation (ICCCA), Greater Noida, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCA49541.2020.9250803.
    Hallam, M., Kalakanis, L., Langlois, J. H., Larson, A., Rubenstein, A. J., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390-423.
    Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1994). Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review, 84, 1174-1194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
    Hamermesh, D. S. (2011). Beauty pays: Why attractive people are more successful. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400839445
    Hart, W., Krumdick, N. D., & Ottati, V. C. (2011). Physical attractiveness and candidate evaluation: A model of correction. Political Psychology, 32(2), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00812.x
    Hasyim, A. W., & Rachmat, M. (2013). The role of personal factor and social pressure on women's intention to vote. International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 3(10), 66-78.
    Hatfeild, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986) Mirror, mirror: The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany, N. Y.: State University of New York.
    Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
    Hayes, D., & Lawless, J. (2015). A non-gendered lens? Media, voters, and female candidates in contemporary congressional elections. Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714003156
    Heilman, M., & Saruwatari, L. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(79)90003-5
    Hitchon, J. C., & Chang, C. C. (1995). Effects of gender schematic processing on the reception of political commercials for men and women candidates. Communication Research, 22(4), 430-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365095022004003
    Hodge, C. N., Hunter, J. E., & Jackson, L. A. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787149
    Hong, S., Johnson, E. K., & Lee, H. (2019). The face tells all: Testing the impact of physical attractiveness and social media information of spokesperson on message effectiveness during a crisis. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 27(3), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12250
    Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. S. (1993). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 503-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600304
    Joseph, W. (1982.) The credibility of physically attractive communicators: A review. Journal of Advertising, 11(3), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1982.10672807
    Kahle, L., & Homer, P. (1985). Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorser: A social adaptation perspective. Journal of consumer research, 11, 954-961. https://doi.org/10.1086/209029
    Kaid, L. (1981). Political Advertising. In Nimmo, D. & Sanders, K. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Political Communication (pp.249-271). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Kanazawa, S., & Still, M. C. (2017). Is there really a beauty premium or an ugliness penalty on earnings? Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9489-6
    Kasey, W. (2016). Stereotypical or just typical: how do US practitioners view the role and function of gender stereotypes in advertisements? International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 864-887. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1160855
    Keating, C. F., Kendrick, T., & Randall, D. (1999). Presidential physiognomies: Altered images, altered perceptions. Political Psychology, 20(3), 593-610. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00158
    Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252054
    King, A., & Leigh, A. (2009). Beautiful politicians. KYKLOS, 62(4), 579-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2009.00452.x
    Ko, W., Pinkleton, B. E., & Yoon, K. (2007). Effects of negative political advertising on voting intention: An exploration of the roles of involvement and source credibility in the development of voter cynicism. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1352726042000315423
    Koh, S., & Kwok, A. (2020). Deepfake: A social construction of technology perspective. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1738357
    Kulka, R. A., & Kessler, J. (1978). Is justice really blind? — The influence of litigant physical attractiveness on juridical judgment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8(4), 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00790.x
    Landy, D., & Sigall, H. (1974). Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036018
    Lathuilière, S., Ricci, E., Sebe, N., Siarohin, A., & Tulyakov, S. (2019). First Order Motion Model for Image Animation [Paper presentation]. 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Neural IPS 2019), Vancouver, Abstract retrieved from https://aliaksandrsiarohin.github.io/first-order-model-website/
    Laybats, C., & Tredinnick, L. (2016). Post truth, information, and emotion. Business Information Review, 33(4), 204-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382116680741
    Lee, L. W., McCarthy, I. P., Kietzmann, J., & Kietzmann, T. C. (2019). Deepfakes: Trick or treat? Business Horizons, 63(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006
    Li, Y., Lyu, S., & Ottati, V. C. (2019). Exposing deep fakes using inconsistent head poses [Paper presentation]. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brighton. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683164.
    Ling, R., Lim, Z.W., & Tandoc, E. C. Jr. (2018). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
    Li, Y., Zhang, C., & Laroche, M. (2019). Is beauty a premium? A study of the physical attractiveness effect in service encounters. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.016
    Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16 (4), 677–715. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009452
    Lyu, S. (2020). Deepfake Detection: Current Challenges and Next Steps [Paper presentation]. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW), London. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMEW46912.2020.9105991.
    Macrae, C. N., & Pendry, L. F. (1994). Stereotypes and mental life: The case of the motivated but thwarted tactician. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(4), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/JESP.1994.1015
    Malanchuk, O., Miller, A. H., & Wattenberg, M. P. (1986). Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates. The American Political Science Review, 80(2), 521-540. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958272
    Maloney, J. C. (1963) Is advertising believability really important? Journal of Marketing, 27(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224296302700401
    Maloney, J. C. (1994). Is advertising believability really important? Marketing Management, 3(1), 47-52.
    Matern, F., Riess, C., & Stamminger, M. (2019). Exploiting Visual Artifacts to Expose Deepfakes and Face Manipulation [Paper presentation]. 2019 IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW), Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACVW.2019.00020.
    Matland, R. E. (1994). Putting scandinavian equality to the test: An experimental evaluation of gender stereotyping of political candidates in a sample of norwegian voters. British Journal of Political Science, 24(2), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400009819
    MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. The Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251413
    McDermott, M. L. (1997). Voting cues in low-Information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary united states elections. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 270-283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111716
    McGrath, J., & McGrath, M. (1962). Effects of partisanship on perceptions of political figures. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(2), 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1086/267092
    Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704000623
    Milazzo, C., & Mattes, K. (2015). Looking good for election day: Does attractiveness predict electoral success in Britain? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(1), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12074
    Miller, W. E., & Shanks, J. (1996). The New American Voter. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.
    Mix. (2019, Aug 16). NotJordanPeterson lets you generate uncannily realistic Jordan Peterson sound bites. The Next Web. https://thenextweb.com/
    Mocan, N., & Tekin, E. (2010). Ugly criminals. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.3386/w12019
    Morrow, P. C. (1990). Physical attractiveness and selection decision making. Journal of Management, 16(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600104
    Mulford, M., Orbell, J., Shatto, C., & Stockard, J. (1998). Physical attractiveness, opportunity, and success in everyday exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 103(6), 1565-1592. https://doi.org/10.1086/231401
    Müller-Rommel, F. (1985). The greens in western Europe: Similar but different. International Political Science Review, 6(4), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218500600407
    Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andı, S., & Nielsen, R. (2020). Reuters institute digital news report 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2020/taiwan-2020/
    Nezlek, J. B., Reis, H. & Wheeler, L. (1980). Physical attractiveness in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 604–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.604
    Nicklin, J., & Roch, S. (2008). Biases influencing recommendation letter contents: physical attractiveness and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(12), 3053-3074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00425.x
    Nimmo, D. & Savage, R. L. (1976). Candidates and their images: Concepts, methods, and findings. Goodyear Publishers.
    Nitz, M., Sigelman, C. K., Sigelman, L. & Walkosz, B. J. (1995). Black candidates, white voters: Understanding racial bias in political perceptions. American Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 243-265. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111765
    Olivola, C. Y. & Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 83-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1
    O'Cass, A. (2002). Political advertising believability and information source value during elections. Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673661
    Palmer, C. & Peterson, R. (2017). Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs. Politics and the Life Sciences, 36(2), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.18
    Palmer, C. & Peterson, R. (2021). Physical attractiveness, halo effects, and social joining. Social Science Quarterly, 102(1), 552-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12892
    Patterson, T. E. (1989). The press and candidate images. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/1.2.123
    Patzer, G. L. (1985). The physical attractiveness phenomena. New York: Plenum.
    Pal, L. A. (1992). Public policy analysis: An introduction. Scarborough.
    Peng, L., Cui, G., Chung, Y., & Zheng, W. (2020). The faces of success: Beauty and ugliness premiums in e-commerce platforms. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920914861
    Peterson, J. (2019, August, 23). Jordan Peterson: The deepfake artists must be stopped before we no longer know what's real. National Post. Retrieved from https://nationalpost.com/
    Ravina, E. (2019). Love & loans: The effect of beauty and personal characteristics in credit markets. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1107307
    Repass, D. (1971). Issue salience and party choice. The American Political Science Review, 65(2), 389-400. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954456
    Reynolds, T., Howard, C., Sjåstad, H., Zhu, L., Okimoto, T. G., Baumeister, R. F., Aquino, K., & Kim, JongHan. (2020). Man up and take it: Gender bias in moral typecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 120-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.05.002
    Rile, N. & Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces. Plos One, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008733
    Rynes, S., & Gerhart, B. (1990). Interviewer assessments of applicant "fit": An exploratory investigation. Personnel Psychology, 43(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb02004.x
    Rössler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., Nießner, M. (2018). FaceForensics: A large-scale video dataset for forgery detection in human faces. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1803.09179
    Saifuddin, A. (2021). Who inadvertently shares deepfakes? Analyzing the role of political interest, cognitive ability, and social network size. Telematics and Informatics, 57, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101508
    Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088412
    Sapiro, V. (1981). If U.S. Senator baker were a woman: An experimental study of candidate images. Political Psychology, 3(1/2), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791285
    Shamir, M., & Arian, A. (1999). Collective identity and electoral competition in israel. The American Political Science Review, 93(2), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585395
    Sigel, R. (1964). Effect of partisanship on the perception of political candidates. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 28(3), 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1086/267268
    Sigelman, C. K., Sigelman, L., Thomas, D. B., & Ribich, F. D. (1986). Gender, physical attractiveness, and electability: An experimental investigation of voter biases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(3), 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01137.x
    Stockemer, D., & Praino, R. (2015). Blinded by beauty? Physical attractiveness and candidate selection in the U.S. house of representatives. Social Science Quarterly, 96(2), 430-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12155
    Stewart, J. E., II. (1980). Defendant's attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,10(4), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00715.x
    Strouse, J. (1975). The mass media, public opinion, and public policy analysis: Linkage explorations (Merrill political science series). C. E. Merrill Publishing.
    Stupp, C. (2019, Aug 30). Fraudsters used ai to mimic CEO’s voice in unusual cybercrime case. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/
    Takai, J. & Xu, W. (2019). Expectancy violation theory on Social media and relationships: A selective review. Psychology and Human Development Sciences, 65, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.18999/nupsych.65.1.4
    Ternovski, J., Kalla, J., & Aronow, P. M. (2021). Deepfake warnings for political videos increase disbelief but do not improve discernment: Evidence from two experiments. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/dta97
    Vaccari, C. & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in News. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
    Wapnick, J., Darrow, A., Kovacs, J., & Dalrymple, L. (1997). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(3), 470-479. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345540
    Warren, L. J. (2016, March, 17). Perceived believability of televised green advertising [Paper presentation]. Association of marketing theory and practice 2016 annual meeting, St. Simons, GA. https://www.amtp.org/programs
    Westerlund, M. (2019). The emergence of deepfake technology: A review. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1282
    Winter, N. (2010). Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans' explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32, 587-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z
    Wojewidka, J. (2020). The deepfake threat to face biometrics. Biometric Technology Today, 2020(2), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-4765(20)30023-0
    Wolf, A. (2017). The XX factor: How the rise of working women has created a far less equal world. Skyhorse Publishing.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE