簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳芷嫣
Wu, Chih-Yen
論文名稱: 諧音法對英語單字的學習與記憶影響效益研究-以台北市一所國中為例
The Effects of the Mnemonic Keyword Method on the Acquisition of Novel Vocabulary:A Case Study of a Junior High School in Taipei City
指導教授: 劉宇挺
Liu, Yeu-Ting
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 102
中文關鍵詞: 視覺輔助遺忘速度諧音法
英文關鍵詞: encoding cue, forgetting rate, the keyword method
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202203123
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:112下載:61
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 第二語言學習的研究者常指出,諧音法能夠幫助學習者記憶單字。然而,針對如何有效減緩學習者遺忘單字的速度之研究仍相當缺乏。因此,本研究旨在探討如何減緩諧音法學習者的遺忘速度,以及文字或圖像何者為更佳的視覺輔助。本研究包含為期五周的實驗、個別訪談,以及研究者在課堂中的觀察紀錄,研究對象為四個班共111名八年級生。研究結果顯示調整諧音法的教學順序能夠減緩學生對單字的遺忘速度,且文字為更佳的視覺輔助。總結而言,此研究希望能解釋諧音法如何促進學生單字學習並如何減緩諧音法的遺忘速度,英語教師也可藉此進一步了解在教室中使用諧音法的相關資訊。
    關鍵字:視覺輔助、遺忘速度、諧音法

    Researchers in second language learning have often suggested that the keyword method would likely facilitate learners’ vocabulary learning. However, research on how to effectively reduce the steepness of the forgetting rate is scant. Therefore, this study explores how to make the acquired vocabulary more robust and investigates which encoding cue, word or picture, facilitates learners’ later retrieval. This research involved a five-week experiment, several interviews, and the researcher’s classroom observations. Four classes of 111 eighth graders were recruited for the study. The results of this study revealed that the adjusted teaching sequence of the keyword method made the acquired vocabulary more robust, and that word encoding cues worked better than picture encoding cues. To conclude, this study may be of importance in explaining how the keyword method facilitates junior high school students’ English vocabulary learning, as well as in providing English teachers with a better understanding when adopting the keyword method in their classrooms.
    Key words: encoding cue, forgetting rate, the keyword method

    TABLE OF CONTENTS 摘要 i ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION - 1 - Motivation and Background - 1 - Rationale and Purpose of the Study - 3 - Theoretical Basis of the Study - 4 - Research Questions - 5 - Organization of the Thesis - 5 - CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW - 7 - The Immediate Effectiveness of the Keyword Method - 7 - Retention Remains an Unresolved Issue - 13 - Changing the Procedure of the Keyword Method as a Possible Solution - 23 - Word or Picture Encoding Cue May Be Influential - 27 - Research Questions - 33 - CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY - 34 - Participants - 34 - Design of the Study - 36 - Materials - 47 - Procedures for Data Collection - 49 - Assessments - 50 - Data Analysis - 52 - CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - 53 - The Adjusted Teaching Sequence - 53 - Word Encoding Cues vs. Picture Encoding Cues - 54 - Results of the Delayed Vocabulary Tests - 55 - Homogeneity of the four groups - 55 - The result of the delayed test of all target words - 55 - The results of Delayed Tests 1 and 2 - 59 - The results of Delayed Test 3 - 61 - The results of Delayed Test 4 - 64 - An Overall Observation and Reflection - 67 - The link between keywords and definitions - 67 - The failure of picture encoding cues - 70 - Participants’ attitudes toward the keyword method - 72 - Discussion of the Teaching Sequence - 74 - The adjusted teaching sequence - 75 - The traditional teaching sequence - 77 - Discussion of the Encoding Cues - 79 - Picture encoding cues failed to facilitate long-term memory - 80 - The effectiveness of word encoding cues needs long-term tracking - 82 - CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION - 84 - Summary of the Major Findings - 84 - Adjusted teaching sequence facilitates later retrieval - 84 - Keywords worked as mnemonics during later retrieval - 85 - Pictures were not helpful in reducing the phonological similarity effect - 85 - Word encoding cues made the novel L2 words more robust - 86 - Keywords can be used to learn other subjects - 86 - Pedagogical Implications - 86 - Limitations of the Study - 88 - Suggestions for Future Research - 90 - REFERENCES - 93 - APPENDIXES - 100 - Appendix A. Vocabulary Chosen from Image System for Memorizing English Words - 100 - Appendix B. Questions Asked During the Interviews - 102 -

    REFERENCES
    Ashouri, P., & Moghadam, M. (2015). The effect of instructing mnemonic devices on immediate versus delayed vocabulary retention. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(1), 87-102.
    Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American
    Psychologist, 30(8), 821.
    Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual
    Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.
    Baleghizadeh, S., & Ashoori, A. (2010). The effect of keyword and word-list methods
    on immediate vocabulary retention of EFL learners. Pakistan Journal of Social
    Sciences (PJSS), 30(2), 251-261.
    Campos, A., González, M. A., & Amor, A. (2003). Limitations of the
    mnemonic-keyword method. The Journal of General Psychology, 130(4),
    399-413.
    Campoy, G., & Baddeley, A. (2008). Phonological and semantic strategies in
    immediate serial recall. Memory, 16(4), 329-340.
    Campoy, G., Castellà, J., Provencio, V., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2015).
    Automatic semantic encoding in verbal short-term memory: Evidence from
    the concreteness effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
    68(4), 759-778.
    Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (1998). Do mnemonic memories fade as time goes by?
    Here's looking anew! Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(3), 276-297.
    Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational
    Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210.
    Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory
    span. British Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 429-432.
    Davoudi, M., & Yousefi, D. (2016). The Effect of Keyword Method on Vocabulary
    Retention of Senior High School EFL Learners in Iran. Journal of Education
    and Practice, 7(11), 106-113.
    De Groot, A. M., & Van Hell, J. G. (2009). The learning of foreign language
    vocabulary. Handbook of Bilingualism, 9.
    Dolean, D. D. (2014). Using the keyword method in the classroom: Is the interacting
    imagery necessary? System, 45, 17-26.
    Dufour, R., & Kroll, J. F. (1995). Matching words to concepts in two languages: A test
    of the concept mediation model of bilingual representation. Memory &
    Cognition, 23(2), 166-180.
    Farley, A., Pahom, O., & Ramonda, K. (2014). Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?
    Using Images to Create a Concreteness Effect for Abstract Words: Evidence
    from Beginning L2 Learners of Spanish. Hispania, 97(4), 634-650.
    Farley, A. P., Ramonda, K., & Liu, X. (2012). The concreteness effect and the
    bilingual lexicon: The impact of visual stimuli attachment on meaning recall
    of abstract L2 words. Language Teaching Research, 16(4), 449-466.
    Jarrold, C., & Citroën, R. (2013). Reevaluating key evidence for the development of
    rehearsal: phonological similarity effects in children are subject to
    proportional scaling artifacts. Developmental Psychology, 49(5), 837.
    Johnson, C. T. (2015). Priming Effects on Word Recognition in Students with Dyslexia. University of Northern Colorado.
    Karpicke, J. D., & Smith, M. A. (2012). Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval
    practice and elaborative encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1),
    17-29.
    Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1998). Learning and recall of foreign-language
    vocabulary: Effects of a keyword strategy for immediate and delayed
    recall.Learning and Instruction, 8(2), 179-194.
    Levin, J. R., Johnson, D. D., Pittelman, S. D., Levin, K. M., Shriberg, L. K., Toms‐
    Bronowski, S., & Hayes, B. L. (1984). A comparison of semantic- and mnemonic-based vocabulary‐learning strategies.
    Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 5(1-2), 1-15.
    Levin, J. R., Levin, M. E., Glasman, L. D., & Nordwall, M. B. (1992). Mnemonic
    vocabulary instruction: Additional effectiveness evidence. Contemporary
    Educational Psychology, 17(2), 156-174.
    Lian, A., Karlsen, P. J., & Winsvold, B. (2001). A re-evaluation of the phonological
    similarity effect in adults' short-term memory of words and
    nonwords. Memory, 9(4-6), 281-299.
    Little, A., & Kobayashi, K. (2015). Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Japanese Life
    Science Students. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 81-111.
    Luna, D., & Peracchio, L. A. (1999). What’s in a bilingual’s mind?: How bilingual
    consumers process information. NA-Advances in Consumer Research Volume
    26.
    McGivern, J. E., & Levin, J. R. (1982). The keyword method and children's
    vocabulary learning: An interaction with vocabulary
    knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(1), 46-54.
    Nation, I. S. (2008). Teaching Vocabulary: The Big Picture 2. Vocabulary and
    Listening 3. Vocabulary and Speaking 4. Vocabulary Learning and Intensive
    Reading 5. Vocabulary Learning Through Extensive Reading 6. Vocabulary
    and Writing 7. The Deliberate Teaching and Learning of Vocabulary 8.
    Specialized Vocabulary 9. Testing Vocabulary Knowledge 10. Planning the
    Vocabulary of a Language Course. Heinle.
    Nation, I. S., & Webb, S. A. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Heinle,
    Cengage Learning.
    Nation, P., & Newton, J. (1997). Teaching vocabulary. Second language vocabulary
    acquisition, 238-254.
    Nimmo, Lisa M., & Roodenrys Steven (2005). The phonological similarity effect in
    serial recognition. Memory, 13(7), 773-784
    Paivio, A. (2013). Dual coding theory, word abstractness, and emotion: a critical
    review of Kousta et al.(2011).
    Peters, E. E., & Levin, J. R. (1986). Effects of a mnemonic imagery strategy on good and poor readers' prose recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 179-192.
    Rummel, N., Levin, J. R., & Woodward, M. M. (2003). Do pictorial mnemonic
    text-learning aids give students something worth writing about? Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 95(2), 327.
    Savill, N., Ellis, A. W., & Jefferies, E. (2017). Newly-acquired words are more phonologically robust in verbal short-term memory when they have associated semantic representations. Neuropsychologia, 98, 85-97.
    Shapiro, A. M., & Waters, D. L. (2005). An investigation of the cognitive processes
    underlying the keyword method of foreign vocabulary learning. Language
    Teaching Research, 9(2), 129-146.
    Siriganjanavong, V. (2013). The mnemonic keyword method: Effects on the
    vocabulary acquisition and retention. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 1.
    Wang, A. Y., & Thomas, M. H. (1992). The effect of imagery‐based mnemonics on
    the long‐term retention of Chinese characters. Language Learning, 42(3),
    359-376.
    Wang, A. Y., & Thomas, M. H. (1995). Effects of keyword on long-term retention:
    Help or hindrance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 468.
    Wang, A. Y., Thomas, M. H., & Ouellette, J. A. (1992). Keyword mnemonic and
    retention of second-language vocabulary words. Journal of Educational
    Psychology, 84(4), 520.
    Wyra, M., Lawson, M. J., & Hungi, N. (2007). The mnemonic keyword method: The
    effects of bidirectional retrieval training and of ability to image on foreign
    language vocabulary recall. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 360-371.
    Yao, H. (1992). Image System for Memorizing English Words. Shanghai, PRC:
    Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE