簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 柯喬文
Ke, Chiao-Wen
論文名稱: 未離家求學女大學生分離個體化發展之詮釋現象學研究
The Development of Separation-Individuation of Female College Students who haven’t Left Home for School- A hermeneutic phenomenology study
指導教授: 田秀蘭
Tien, Hsiu-Lan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 198
中文關鍵詞: 女大學生分離-個體化未離家求學詮釋現象學
英文關鍵詞: Female college students, Interpretation of hermeneutic phenomenology, Not leaving home to study, Separation-individuation
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900128
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:138下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的目的在於瞭解女大學生未離家求學的生活經驗、經驗調適與經驗意義,採質性研究個別深度訪談法,以半結構式的開放問句,訪談六位大學未離家求學的女大學生,並以詮釋現象學方法進行資料分析與討論,再以分離個體化理論與其經驗進行對話,形成最後的整體經驗詮釋。

    研究結果發現未離家求學女大學生分離個體化的生活經驗有以下幾個面向:「與同儕的關係產生縫隙及個人界線的不易維持」、「門禁禁不禁?-與約束達成共處」、「生活作息或生活習慣受到干擾」、「與父母親分享生活藉以拉近情感距離」、「與父母親的互惠和衝突促進關係之和諧與平等」;而女大學生未離家求學的經驗調適為「盡力妥善分配時間」、「以空間之進退取得理想的關係距離」、「運用讀境揣摩化解離合之衝突」、「為自己的關係和個體化需求發聲」與「接納自己與系統他者的限制」;以整體視角而言,女大學生未離家求學的經驗反思與意義則有「生活事務的學習較為停滯」、「更加珍惜與家人的日常互動」、「更加認識家人與自己」、「關係達到新的平衡」、「父母親有機會看見女兒成長的過程」、「家的意義轉變」以及「穩定的客體支持促成想像中更好的離家」。

    進一步的,以分離個體化理論的視角與整體經驗進行對話,將未離家求學女大學生分離個體化發展之樣貌歸納與詮釋為以下六個面向:每日的「離」與「返」-有「關係」就是沒關係;牽「絆」與牽「伴」-化「礙」為「愛」;「把握」時間-「把持」界線、「掌握」生活空檔;無論「長成」如何,都是「成長」;「離」與「合」-離中有合,合中有離;「未離家」是為了可以「更好的離家」。

    最後,本研究根據上述發現,針對未離家求學的女大學生及後續的研究方向提出建議,也對助人專業工作提出實務上的反思與建議。

    The purpose of this study is to understand the life experience of female college students who have not left home to study, and also understand the adjustment and meanings of their life experience. In this study, six participants were interviewd with a semi-structured questionnaire. The data were analyzed and discussed with the hermeneutic phenomenological approach. After discussed with the theory of Separation-Individuation, the study will form the final interpretation of the overall experience.

    The results of the study found that the life experiences of the female students who have not left home to study had the following aspects: “There is a gap between the relationship with the peers and the personal boundary is not easy to maintain”, “The norms of access control? - Coexistence with the constraints”, “Daily life or habits are disturbed”, “Sharing life with parents to draw closer to each other”, and “Reciprocity and conflict with parents promote harmony and equality of the relations”. And the method of adjustment for female college students in their life experiences is “To try their best to allocate time”, “Get the ideal distance of relationship by advancing and retreating space”, “Use reading and guessing to resolve conflicts”, “Voicing yourself for individuation or connection to someone”, and “Accept one's own and others”. From a holistic point of view, female college students have “Cherishing the daily interaction with family members”, “Recognizes family members and self”, “Relationships reach a new balance”, “Parents have the opportunity to see their daughters growing up”, “Changes in the meaning of the family” and “Stable object support to promotes better separation”.

    In response to the above research results, further dialogues were conducted from the perspective of the separation of individualization theories to form a holistic and comprehensive description, and the appearances of the individualized development of non-leaving female college students were summarized and interpreted as the following six aspects: “Daily returns and relationships”, “Accompany and love”, “Hold time and handle the boundary”, “No matter what change, it is growth”, “Separation and harmony” and “Better to leave home”.

    Finally, based on the results, there are some suggestions for professional helpers and female college students who have not left home for study, a few suggestions are also made for future researches.

    致謝詞 i 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目次 vi 表次 viii 圖次 ix 第一章 緒論 1   第一節 研究動機 1   第二節 研究目的與問題 6   第三節 名詞釋義 6 第二章 文獻探討 9    第一節 分離-個體化的內涵 9   第二節 女大學生的分離-個體化發展 16   第三節 未離家求學女大學生的分離-個體化發展 23 第三章 研究方法 31   第一節 研究取向 31   第二節 研究參與者 34   第三節 研究工具 36   第四節 研究實施程序 40   第五節 資料分析方法 43   第六節 研究品質 46   第七節 研究倫理 48 第四章 研究結果 51   第一節 A的分離個體化故事 51   第二節 B的分離個體化故事 66   第三節 C的分離個體化故事 80   第四節 D的分離個體化故事 95   第五節 E的分離個體化故事 110   第六節 F的分離個體化故事 125   第七節 綜合普遍結構 140 第五章 討論與建議 143   第一節 未離家求學女大學生分離個體化的生活經驗 143   第二節 女大學生未離家求學的經驗調適 150   第三節 女大學生未離家求學的經驗反思與意義 160   第四節 女大學生未離家求學整體經驗的綜合討論 168   第五節 反思與對話 174   第六節 研究建議 177 參考文獻 181   中文部分 181   西文部分 185 附錄 192   附錄一 訪談大綱 192   附錄二 研究邀請函 194   附錄三 研究邀請回函 195   附錄四 研究參與同意書 196   附錄五 研究檢核表 197   附錄六 訪談札記 198

    中文部分
    石珮怡(2006):未婚成年女性與同住父母之代間關係研究。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文。
    余德慧(2001):詮釋現象心理學。台北:心靈工坊。
    吳澤玫(2004):高達美文本意義與詮釋者的關係。哲學與文化,31(7),163-183。
    吳麗娟、蔡秀玲(1998):不同性別大學生的依附關係、個體化與適應之關係。教育心理學報,30(1),73-90。
    李自強(2006):大學生個體化程度與生活適應之相關研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。
    李瑞婷(2008):成年前期子女與退休父母的親子離合關係。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文。
    李維倫、賴憶嫻(2009):現象學方法論:存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學報,25,275-321。
    汪文聖(2001):現象學方法與理論之反思:一個質性方法之介紹。應用心理研究,12,49-76。
    周玉慧(2015):青少年至成年初期親子關係的變化及其影響。中華心理學刊,57(1),67-89。
    周樂鵑(2011):離家求學的未婚成年女性返家經驗之敘說研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
    周麗玉(1996):親子互動與青少年的離合需求。諮商與輔導,132,2-7。
    林谷蘭、張金鶚(2003):離巢?不離巢!。中華民國住宅學會主辦「中華民國住宅學會第十二屆年會」宣讀之論文(台北)。
    林佳誼(2013):青少年親子離合關係與生活適應。諮商與輔導,329,47-51。
    林美和(2006):成人發展、性別與學習。台北:五南。
    林惠雅(2007):大學生對自主的界定及其發展歷程:以親子關係為脈絡。應用心理研究,33,231-251。
    邱文彬、林美珍(2000):大學生邁向成熟的同儕人際關係:容忍性、同理心發展之性別與年齡差異的探討。教育與心理研究,22(上),161-192。
    邱秀燕(2000):青少年家庭系統分化、心理分離-個體化、自我發展及情緒適應之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
    邱珍琬(2011):首次離家大學女生對家的觀感-初探研究。彰化師大教育學報,19,31-58。
    胡幼慧(1996):理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
    修慧蘭(2011):何謂糾結/疏離關係-本土大學生親子界限之研究。諮商輔導學報:高師輔導所刊,23,1-18。
    唐先梅(1999):從雙薪家庭父母的觀點看子女參與家務工作之情形。青少年兒童福利學刊,21,51-59。
    孫世維(1994):青少年與父母的情感關係:依附的性質與重要性。法商學報,29,259-304。
    孫世維(1997):親子依附與分離-個體化:大學時期的發展。政大教育與心理研究,20,271-296。
    孫世維(1998):大學生的分離-個體化與相關家庭因素。中華心理衛生學刊,11(2),21-58。
    孫世維(1999):由離家上大學看大一新生親子分離的發展。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC 88-2413-H-005A-001)。
    孫頌賢、修慧蘭(2004):大學生的親子界限:親子關係-自我界向量表編製與模式初探。中國測驗學會測驗學刊,51(1),45-78。
    高淑清(2001):在美華人留學生太太的生活世界:詮釋與反思。本土心理學研究,12,225-285。
    高淑清(2008):質性研究的18堂課:首航初探之旅。高雄:麗文。
    高淑清(2008):質性研究的18堂課:揚帆再訪之旅。高雄:麗人。
    畢恆達(1995):生活經驗研究的反省:詮釋學的觀點。本土心理學研究,4,224-259。
    許詩淇、黃囇莉(2008):天下無不是的父母?-父母角色義務對親子衝突與親子關係之影響。中華心理學刊,51(3),295-317。
    陳志賢、戴嘉南(2006):長期離家出走青少年親子離合關係變化之研究。高師輔導所刊,15,1-34。
    陳秉華(1995):諮商中大學生的心理分離-個體化衝突改變歷程研究。教育心理學報,28,145-176。
    陳郁齡(1999):家庭功能與大學生個體化、生活適應之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
    陳清甄(2009):華人孝道文化、父母控制與大學生分離-個體化(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學諮商心理學研究所碩士論文。
    陳斐虹(1996):大學生離家經驗及其與父母依附關係改變之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
    惠風(1995):大一學生原生家庭經驗、心理分離-個體化、與情緒適應之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
    童芳愉(2015):分離-個體化、孝道與情侶交往關係品質之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
    鈕文英(2014):質性研究方法與論文寫作-增訂版。台北:雙葉書廊。
    黃郁喬(2005):離家過程中親子關係的離與合:分離個體化與依戀品質對親子關係滿意度的影響。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
    葉光輝(2004):現代華人家人的互動關係及其心理歷程。本土心理研究,22,81-119。
    葉光輝(2009):華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,32,101-148。
    葉光輝(2017):從親子互動脈絡看華人性格的養成。台北:五南。
    劉惠琴(1999):女性主義與心理學。載於王雅各(主編),性屬關係(上):性別與社會、建構(135-175)。台北:心理。
    劉惠琴(2000):青少女在母女關係中的個體化模式。中華心理衛生學刊,12(4),53-91。
    劉惠琴(2005):親子關係中「多元個體化」歷程的內涵與測量。中華心理衛生學刊,18(4),55-92。
    劉麗娟(2002):未婚女性關係中自我的移動。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
    蔡秀玲(1997):大學男女學生依附關係、個體化與適應之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
    蔡淑鈴、吳麗娟(2003):青少年的親子關係與共依附特質之相關研究。教育心理學報,35(1),59-78。
    魏珮文(2004):「關係」對大學女生個體化過程之影響-另一段邁向成熟長大的路。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    譚偉象(2000):分離-個體化歷程的台灣本土化研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC-89-2413-H-033-003)。
    譚偉象、吳琇瑩(2002):華人的分離-個體化歷程與關係主義。中央研究院民族研究所主辦「第四屆華人心理學家學術研討會暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會」宣讀之論文(台北)。
    王雅各(譯)(2002):不同的語音:心理學理論與女性的發展。台北:心理。Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development.

    西文部分
    Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4), 709-716.
    Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Anderson, S. A., & Fleming, W. M. (1986). Late adolescents' home-leaving strategies: Predicting ego identity and college adjustment. Adolescence, 21(82), 453-459.
    Aquilino, W. S., & Supple, K. R. (1991). Parent-child relations and parent's satisfaction with living arrangements when adult children live at home. Journal of marriage and the family, 53(1), 13-27.
    Blos, P. (1979). The adolescent passage: Developmental issues. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
    Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol.1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    Boyd, M., & Norri, D. (2000). Demographic change and young adults living with parents, 1981-1996. Canadian Studies in Population, 27(2), 267-281.
    Boyd, M., & Park, S. (2008). Who lives at home? Ethnic variations among second generation young adults. Canadian Diversity, 6(2), 42-46.
    Cemens, A. W. & Axelson, L. J. (1985). The not-so-empty-nest: The return of the fledgling adult. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 34(2), 259-264.
    Cherlin, J. C., E. Scabini & G. Rossi. (1997). Still in Nest: Delayed Home Leaving in Europe and the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 18(6), 572-575.
    Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    Choi, K. H. (2002). Psychological separation-individuation and adjustment to college among Korean American students: The roles of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(4), 468-475.
    Denissen, J. J., van Aken, Marcel A., & Dubas, J. S. (2009). It takes two to tango: How parents' and adolescents' personalities link to the quality of their mutual relationship. Developmental Psychology, 45, 928-941.
    Dien, D. (1992). Gender and individuation: China and the West. Psychoanalytic Review, 79(1), 105-119.
    Fishbane, M. D. (2001). Relational Narratives of the Self. Family Process, 40(3), 273-291.
    Fleming, W. M., & Anderson, S. A. (1986). Individuation from the family of origin and personal adjustment in late adolescence. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12(3), 311-315.
    Geuzaine, C., Debry, M., & Liesens, V. (2000). Separation from parents in late adolescence: The same for boys and girls? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(1), 79-91.
    Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Gilligan, C. (1991). Woman's Psychological Development: Implications for Psychotherapy. In Gilligan, C., Roger, A. G., & Tolman, D. L. (Eds), Woman, Girls & Psychotherapy - Reframing Resistance (pp. 5-32). Harrington, DE: Park Press.
    Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi(Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 8-22). Pittsburgh, PA:
    Duquesne University Press.
    Gnaulati, E., & Heine, B. J. (2001). Separation-individualization in late adolescence: An investigation of gender and ethnic differences. The Journal of Psychology, 135(1), 59-70.
    Greene, A., & Boxer, A. (1986). Daughters and sons as young adults: Restructuring the ties that bind. In N. Datan, A. Greene, & H. Reese (Eds.), Life span developmental psychology: Intergenerational relations (pp. 125-149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationship and the development of identity exploration in adolescence. Child Development, 56(2), 415-428.
    Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1986). Individuation in family relationships. Human Development, 29(2), 82-100.
    Hoffman, J. A. (1984). Psychological separation of late adolescents from their parents.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(2), 170-178.
    Holmbeck, G. N., & Wandrei, M. L. (1993). Individual and relational predictor of adjustment in first-year college student. Journal of Counseling Psychology,40(1), 73-78.
    Jordan, J. V. (1991). Empathy and self boundaries. In Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., & Surrey, J. L. (Eds.), Women’s Growth In Connection: Writing from Stone Center (pp. 67-80). New York: Guildford Press.
    Josselson, R. (1980). Ego development in adolescence. In Adelson, J. (Eds), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 188-210). New York, NY: Wiley.
    Josselson, R. (1988). The embedded self: I and thou revisited. In D. K. Lapsley & F. C. Power (Eds.), Self, ego, and identity: Integrative approaches (pp. 91-108). New York: Springer.
    Kreider, M. K. (2007, August). Young adults living in their Parent’s home. Paper presented at ASA annual meetings, New York.
    Lapsley, D. K., & Edgerton, J. E. (2002). Separation-individuation, adult attachment style, and colledge adjnustment. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 484-492.
    Lapsley, D. K., Rice, K. G., & Shadid, G. E. (1989). Psychological separation and adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(3), 286-294.
    Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (1998). Attachment to parents, social support expectations,and socioemotional adjustment during the high school-college transition. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(1), 1-27.
    Leondari, A., & Kiosseoglou, G. (2000). The relationship of parental attachment and psychological separation to the psychological functioning of young adults. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(4), 451-464.
    Levinson, D. J. (1986). A conception of adult development. American psychologist, 41(1), 3-13.
    Lopez, F. G. (1986). Family structure and depression: Implications for the counseling of depressed college students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64(8), 508-511.
    Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.
    Main, M. (1996). Introduction to the section on attachment objects and psychopathology: Overview of the field of attachment. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 64(2), 237-243.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
    McCurdy, S. J. & Scherman, A. (1996). Effects of family structure on the adolescent separation-individuation process. Adolscence, 31(122), 307-319.
    Miller, J. B. (1991). The development of women's sense of self. In J. V. Jordan, A. G. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver & J. L. Surrey (Eds.), Women’s growth in Connection: Writing from stone center (pp. 11-26). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
    Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., & Hooks, T. (1997). The healing Connection: How women form relationships in therapy and in life. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    Mulde, C. H., & Clark, W. A. V. (2002). Leaving home for college and gaining independence. Environment and Planning A, 34(6), 981-999.
    Pipp, S., Shaver, P., Jennings, S., Lamborn, S., & Fischer, K. W. (1985). Adolescents'theories about the development of their relationships with parents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 991-1001.
    Rice, K. G. (1992). Separation-individuation and adjustment to college: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(2), 203-213.
    Rice, K. G., Cole, D. A., & Lapsley, D. K. (1990). Separation-individuation, family cohesion, and adjustment to college: Measurement validation and test of a theoretical model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(2), 195-202.
    Scharf, M., Mayseless, O., & Kivenson-Baron, I. (2004). Adolescents' attachment representations and developmental tasks in emerging adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 430-444.
    Schulman, L. M. (1992). The Relationship of College Residential Status of Freshmen to Identity Achievement, Psychological Separation, and Maturity of Relationship Parents. New York University Doctortal Dissertation.
    Schultheiss, E. P., & Blustein, D. L. (1994). Role of adolescent-parent relationships in college student development and adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(2), 248-255.
    Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2006). Leaving home or still in the Nest? Parent-child relationships and psychological health as predictors of different leaving home patterns. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 864-876.
    Shaver, P., Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1986). Transition to college: Network changes, social skill, and loneliness. In Duck, S., Perlman, D. (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 193- 219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Silverberg, S., & Steinberg, L. (1987). Adolescent autonomy, parent-adolescent conflict, and parental well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 293-312.
    Slote, W. H. (1992). Oedipal ties and the issue of separation-individuation in traditional Confucian societies. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 20(3), 435-453.
    Steketee, M. (2009). Unraveling parent-child coresidence (Master's thesis). University of South Carolina.
    Sullivan, K., & Sullivan, A. (1980). Adolescent-parent separation. Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 93-99.
    Surrey, J. L. (1991a). The "self-in-relation" : A theory of women's development. In J. V. Jordan, A. G. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver, & J. L. Surrey (Eds.), Women's growth in Connection: Writing from stone center (pp. 51-66). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
    Surrey, J. L. (1991b). Relationship and Empowerment. In J. V. Jordan, A. G. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver, & J. L. Surrey (Eds.), Women's growth in Connection: Writing from stone center (pp. 162-180). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
    Turcotte, M. (2006). Parents with adult children living at home. Canadian Social Trends, 80, 2-9.
    Ward, R., & Spitze, G. (1992). Consequences of parent-adult child coresidence: A review and research agenda. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 553-572.
    Wertz, F. J. (1985). Method and findings in a phenomenological psychological study of a complex life-event: Being criminally victimized. In A. Giorgi (Ed.),Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 155-216). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2024/12/31
    QR CODE