簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝富順
Hsieh, Fu-Shun
論文名稱: 臺灣小吃導入PDCA循環提升競爭優勢之研究-以師園食品為例
A Study on the Importation of Taiwanese Snacks into PDCA Cycle to Enhance Competitive Advantage- Taking Shi Yun Chicken as an Example
指導教授: 王國欽
Wang, Kuo-Ching
駱香妃
Luo, Xiang-Fei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 運動休閒與餐旅管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Sport, Leisure and Hospitality Management
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 74
中文關鍵詞: PDCA資源基礎理論競爭優勢臺灣小吃QSCV
英文關鍵詞: resource-based theory, competitive advantages, Taiwanese snacks, PDCA, QSCV
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900738
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:66下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 因家庭及社會結構的改變,臺灣人的外食人口比例逐年升高,但由於加入餐飲業的門檻過低,每年歇業比亦高達7%以上,暗指要在餐飲業競爭與取得優勢並非易事。因此,本研究旨在探討將PDCA(規劃-執行-查核-行動)循環導入臺灣小吃(小型餐飲業)是否能提升競爭優勢。本研究採質性研究,運用深度訪談,採立意抽樣,總共訪談7位餐飲業負責人—其中包括前麥當勞亞洲區副總裁與前達美樂研發及採購協理;2位連鎖餐飲集團負責人;以及3位餐飲業老闆。最後透過熟客焦點團體,找出研究個案所需改善的問題。
    本研究透過內容分析法進行分析,研究結果發現與食安問題相較下,顧客更重視環境改善議題,代表過去數年間餐飲業的食材品質已逐漸取得顧客信任,與標榜食品安全相較之下,注重用餐環境改善對提升競爭優勢的效果更為顯著。至於流程改善、明確標示、人才效率提、利用外部資源、及服務改善對於競爭優勢皆有所助益。此外,本研究亦透過行動研究法,實地將PDCA循環導入研究個案,在2017年6月至2019年5月這段研究期,研究個案營收成長了22.29%,躍居UBER Eats 2019年營收前十名的單店,證實找出內部問題與不斷解決問題對提升餐飲業的競爭優勢有正相關。
    本研究根據深度訪談與內容分析法進行分析,結合資源基礎理論、麥當勞的QSCV(品質-服務-清潔-價值)理論、與外部競爭優勢理論,提出一個適合餐飲業的競爭優勢理論架構,以茲後續研究進行批判與驗證。最後,本研究建議餐飲業近年來重視圖文並茂的網路或實體行銷,但強化自身的核心力對於未來的成長會更加穩健,與其侷限於開發新客源,提升顧客回購的比例更顯得重要,因此希冀未來研究可探究新餐飲時代所面臨的衝擊與可取得之機會。

    As family and social structures change, the percentage of dining outside in Taiwan has risen gradually year by year. However, due to low threshold of entering into the dining industry, up to 7% or above of restaurants shut down every year, showing that it is not easy to earn advantages in competitions in the dining industry. In this paper, we aim at exploring whether introducing PDCA (plan-Do-Check-Action) to Taiwanese snacks (small-sized dining industry) can enhance competition advantages. On the other side, since this study is a qualitative study, in order to achieve effect of in-depth interviews, we have interviewed 7 principals in the dining industry. Those principals include the previous vice-president of Macdonald in Asia, the previous R&D and Purchase Associate General Manager of Domino, 2 principals of chain dining groups, and 3 owners in the dining industry. Along with one regular customer focus group, this study attempts to find out the problems that the study cases need to solve.
    This study conducted analysis by means of content analysis; from the research results, it is found that the degree that the customers value environment improvement is higher than that in the food security issue. It shows that food material quality in the dining industry has gradually won the customers’ trust. Compared with featuring food security, emphasizing the dining environment has raised the competitive advantages even more significantly. As for work-flow improvement, clear label content, raising talented personnel’s working efficiency, utilizing the external resources, and improving service quality can help elevate competitive advantages even more significantly. Additionally, through action research method, this study introduced PDCA cycle into the study cases. From June, 2017, to May, 2019, the earning of the cases in this study has grown 22.29%. Plus the first 10 single stores in UBER Eats 2019, it is proven that the internal problems and ceaseless problem solving is positively correlated with raising competitive advantages in the dining industry.
    Based on the in-depth interviews and content analysis, we conducted analysis. Combined with resource-based theory, Macdanold’s QSCV (Quality-Service-Cleanliness-Value) theory as well as the external competitive advantage theory, a competitive advantage theoretical framework diagram suitable for the dining industry has been proposed for the subsequent studies to criticize and verify. This study thus suggests that, since the dining industry has valued Internet and Physical Marketing with abundant images and text in recent years, strengthening the business’s core power can make growth in the future even more stable. In other words, instead of developing new customer resources, it is better raise the ratio of the customer’s repo. Therefore, the future studies should probe into the impact and opportunities of a new dining age.

    中文摘要…………………………………..…………………….…………………………...…i 英文摘要…………………………………..……………….………………………...…ii 謝 誌…………………………………..……………….…………………..…………...…iv 目 次…………………………………..……………….……………………………...…v 表 次…………………………………..……………….………………...…………...…vi 圖 次…………………………………..……………….………………...……………...…ix 第壹章 緒論........................................... 1 第一節 研究背景....................................... 1 第二節 研究問題....................................... 6 第三節 研究目的........................................7 第四節 研究個案....................................... 8 第五節 研究流程圖......................................10 第貳章 文獻回顧........................................ 11 第一節 臺灣小吃....................................... 11 第二節 競爭優勢....................................... 13 第三節 資源基礎理論................................... 15 第四節 PDCA循環的運用................................. 18 第五節 QSCV理論....................................... 24 第六節 文獻回顧 總結...................................25 第參章 研究設計與方法.................................. 26 第一節 研究設計...................................... 26 第二節 研究場域與資料蒐集............................. 26 第三節 理論基礎與訪談大綱設計......................... 28 第四節 資料分析方法................................... 31 第肆章 資料結果分析......................................33 第一節 樣本特性分析....................................33 第二節 訪談逐字稿複核結果..............................34 第三節 分析單位及分類發展….............................35 第四節 深度訪談內容分析................................38 第五節 研究個案導入PDCA對於競爭優勢相對關係.............59 第六節 本研究應用在實務面的挑戰........................61 第伍章 結論............................................. 63 第一節 研究結論......................................... 63 第二節 研究貢獻......................................... 66 第三節 研究限制及後續建議................................ 67 引用文獻.................................................69 附錄....................................................72

    方至民 (2012)。策略管理:建立企業永續競爭力。新北市: 前程文化事業有限公司。
    李明元 (2018)。大店長開講3。臺北市:商周。
    李春方(1996)。中國飲食研究論文專集二。臺北:中國飲食基金會
    李明軒、邱如美(譯) (2010) 。競爭優勢。臺北市:天下文化。(Michael E. P., 1985)
    李怡君 (2006)。臺灣的小吃。臺北市: 民生報社。
    余舜德、周耿生(2004)。臺灣夜市市場系統的發展:以臺北都會區及臺南縣為例。民族學研究所資料彙編,18,1- 42。
    林步昇(譯) (2014)。永不放棄,我如何打造麥當勞王國。臺北市:經濟新潮社。(Ray K., 1977)
    吳國泰(2003)。台南市小吃文化研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺南師範學院鄉土文化研究所,臺南市。
    周勝方、洪久賢(2001)。餐飲連鎖加盟管理:以系統化經營臺灣美食,征服全世界的胃。新北市:華立。
    周勝方、洪久賢(2011)。從「吃飽沒?」到「好吃嘸?」-臺灣飲食文化變遷與發展之探析。第十二屆中華飲食文化學術研討會論文集,525-556。
    周姚君 (譯) (2013)。圖解豐田生產方式。臺北市:城邦。(豐田生產方式研究會,2007)
    洪志成、廖梅花 (2003)。焦點團體訪談。嘉義:濤石。
    侯嘉政、林育名、張宏榮 (2012)。品牌資源特性對品牌權益影響之研究:資源基礎觀點。行銷評論,9(1),1-18。
    陳向明 (2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南文化。
    陳豐裕 (2010)。夜市小吃經營關鍵成功因素分析-以臺南花園夜市平價牛排業為例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄大學學位論文,高雄。
    陳惠莉 (譯) (2017)。鬼速PDCA工作術。臺北市:三采。(富田和成,2017)
    黃營杉(1999)。策略管理。臺北市:新陸書局。
    許文治(譯) (1997)。現場改善。臺北市:美商麥格羅。(今井正明,1997)
    郭慶輝 (2015)。地道尋味-廣東湯溯源之旅 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    童秋淞 (2015)。臺灣傳統美食的傳承與延續:以百年老店度小月擔仔麵為例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄餐旅大學,高雄市。
    張玉欣、楊玉萍 (2014)。飲食文化概論。臺北市:揚智文化
    游懿珊 (2012)。中小型餐飲業現場改善之研究-以礁溪八寶冬粉推行品管圈活動為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立清華大學,新竹市。
    孫正義 (2018)。軟銀孫正義的核心工作術PDCA。臺北市:先覺。
    經濟部統計處 (2019)。批發、零售及餐飲業經營實況調查報告。取自http://dmz9.moea.gov.tw/gmweb/investigate/InvestigateEA.aspx
    經濟部統計處 (2018)。餐飲業在經營上遭遇的困境(可複選)。取自http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/home/Home.aspx
    臺北市商業處(2017)。各類開歇業及資本額變動情形月報表。取自
    https://www.tcooc.gov.taipei/News.aspx?n=C62BD99ADB7F409B&sms=412F4B30096DE558
    Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent, Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
    Ansoff, H.I., & McDonnell E., (1990). Implanting Strategic Management. Upper Saddie River, NY: Prentice Hall.
    Barney (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Bainbridge, W. S. (1989). Survey research: a computer-assistant introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Cousin, G. (2005). Case study research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(3), 421-427.
    Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design qualitative & quantitative approaches. Retrieved from http://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q)/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1834952.
    Hill, C. W. L., Schilling, M. A., & Jones, G. R. (1995). Strategic management theory: An integrated approach. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
    Kassarhjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8-18.
    Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433.
    Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of social issues, 2(4), 34-36.
    Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand, CA: Sage Publications.
    Osterwalder A., & Pigneur, Y (2012). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NY: John Wiley & Sones,
    Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
    Suzaki, K. (1993). The New Shop Floor Management: Empowering People for Continuous Improvement. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
    Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools. New York, NY: Routledge, Inc.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2), 171-180.
    Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE