簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蘇盈方
Su, Ying-Fang
論文名稱: 當老闆說對不起:華人領導者道歉動機之研究
When the Boss Says Sorry: A Study of the Motivations of Chinese Leaders' Apology
指導教授: 許書瑋
Hsu, Shu-Wei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 全球經營與策略研究所
Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 48
中文關鍵詞: 領導者道歉
英文關鍵詞: leader, apology
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900815
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:92下載:61
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 道歉是一種意義深遠的人類互動行為,為兩造不平等的雙方提供釐清彼此差異的途徑,進而開啟對話、重建彼此尊嚴與關係,也成為近代興起的議題。任何人都有可能道歉,但如果道歉是發生在有威嚴、具楷模形象的領導者身上呢?本研究以半結構訪談法進行質性研究,搜集領導者道歉的情境案例,了解領導者道歉的動機。而本研究總結四個使領導者不排斥道歉而為之的結果,包含:大局為重、風範楷模、仁愛體恤、心胸寬闊,進而說明此四個動機如何推動、影響領導者道歉。本研究除提出四個正向意涵之外,在最後提出本研究係以領導者角度出發,未來可以對偶方式探討在不同的道歉事件中,領導者道歉對追隨者的影響及感受;此外,道歉中亦可能隱含策略或手段的成分,將可作為未來研究之方向。

    One of the most profound human interactions is the offering of apologies. Apologies provide processes for both unequal parties to settle and clarify their differences, thereby opening up dialogue and rebuilding mutual dignity and relationships. Also, it becomes an issue in the rise of modern times. Anyone can apologize, but what if the apology happens to a leader with a majestic and exemplary image? This study uses a semi-structured interview to conduct qualitative research, collect cases of leaders apologizing, and to understand the motivation of leaders’ apology. The study summarizes four results that make the leader not rejecting the apology, including: macro perspective, role model, benevolent heart, and flexible mind, then explains how these four motives push and influence the leaders to apologize. In addition to the four positive findings, this study concludes that the research is based on the leader's perspective that we can explore the influence and feelings of leaders' apologies on followers in different situation in the future. An apology may also imply the elements of a strategy or means that will serve as a direction for future research.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 目錄 iii 表目錄 v 圖目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第一節 道歉的意義 3 第二節 道歉的方式 4 第三節 道歉的動機 7 第四節 道歉的難處 9 第五節 小結 9 第三章 研究方法 11 第一節 研究方法 11 第二節 研究對象 14 第三節 研究步驟 16 第四章 研究結果與討論 18 第五章 研究結論與建議 37 第一節 研究發現與建議 37 第二節 研究限制與未來發展 38 參考文獻 39 附錄 43

    一、英文文獻
    Arnold, K. A., Turner, N., Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & McKee, M. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: the mediating role of meaningful work. J Occup Health Psychol, 12(3), 193-203.

    Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34.

    Ayduk, Ö ., Gyurak, A., Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. B. (2013). Consistency over flattery: Self-verification processes revealed in implicit and behavioral responses to feedback. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 538-545.

    Basford, T. E., Offermann, L. R., & Behrend, T. S. (2014). Please accept my sincerest apologies: Examining follower reactions to leader apology. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 99-117.

    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations: Collier Macmillan.

    Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership: Sage.

    Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership: Psychology press.

    Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 97(2), 117-134.

    Burns, J. (1978). Leadership Harper & Row. New York, 181.

    Byrne, A., Barling, J., & Dupré, K. E. (2014). Leader apologies and employee and leader well-being. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 91-106.

    Christie, A. M., & Barling, J. (2010). Beyond status: relating status inequality to performance and health in teams. J Appl Psychol, 95(5), 920-934.

    Davis, D. E., Worthington Jr, E. L., & Hook, J. N. (2010). Humility: Review of measurement strategies and conceptualization as personality judgment. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 243-252.

    Denzin N. and Lincoln Y. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication Inc.

    Fritz, C., Lam, C. F., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2011). It's the little things that matter: An examination of knowledge workers' energy management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 28-39.

    Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research New York Aldine De Gruyter. In: Inc.

    Kellerman, B. (2006). When should a leader apologize and when not? Harvard business review, 84(4), 72-81; 148.

    Lazare, A. (2004). On apology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience: Irvington.

    Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Huberman, M. A., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook: sage.

    Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995) In-depth Interviewing. South Melbourne: Longman.

    Morris, J. A., Brotheridge, C. M., & Urbanski, J. C. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human relations, 58(10), 1323-1350.

    Nahum-Shani, I., & Bamberger, P. A. (2011). Explaining the Variable Effects of Social Support on Work-Based Stressor-Strain Relations: The Role of Perceived Pattern of Support Exchange. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 114(1), 49-63.

    Regehr, C., & Gutheil, T. (2002). Apology, justice, and trauma recovery. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 30(3), 425-430. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12380424

    Schlenker, B. R., & Darby, B. W. (1981). The use of apologies in social predicaments. Social psychology quarterly, 271-278.

    Struthers, C. W., Eaton, J., Santelli, A. G., Uchiyama, M., & Shirvani, N. (2008). The effects of attributions of intent and apology on forgiveness: When saying sorry may not help the story. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 983-992.

    Swann Jr, W. B. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. Social psychological perspectives on the self, 2, 33-66.

    Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation: Stanford University Press.

    Tucker, S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Reid, E. M., & Elving, C. (2006). Apologies and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(2), 195.

    Wood, J. V., Heimpel, S. A., Newby-Clark, I. R., & Ross, M. (2005). Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory: self-esteem differences in the experience and anticipation of success. J Pers Soc Psychol, 89(5), 764-780.

    二、中文文獻
    鄭伯壎、樊景立(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究,13,126-180。

    下載圖示
    QR CODE